Probióticos e prebióticos na prevenção e no tratamento de doenças em lactentes e crianças / Probiotics and prebiotics in prevention and treatment of diseases in infants and children

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o impacto do uso de probióticos e prebióticos na saúde das crianças. FONTES DOS DADOS: Foram pesquisados os bancos de dados MEDLINE e LILACS, selecionando-se artigos relevantes em inglês e francês. SÍNTESE DOS DADOS: O leite humano é rico em oligossacarídeos prebióticos e pode conter probióticos. Não existem dados sugerindo que a adição de probióticos a fórmulas para lactentes possa ser prejudicial, mas as evidências de sua eficácia são insuficientes para que seja recomendada. Visto que dados sugerem que a adição de oligossacarídeos prebióticos específicos pode reduzir infecções e atopia em lactentes saudáveis, sua adição parece razoável. Os benefícios a longo prazo dos pro e prebióticos para o sistema imunológico em desenvolvimento ainda precisam ser comprovados. Probióticos selecionados reduzem a duração da diarreia infecciosa em 1 dia, mas faltam evidências quanto à prevenção, exceto na diarreia associada a antibióticos. Alguns probióticos específicos previnem a enterocolite necrosante, e outros micro-organismos podem ser benéficos nos casos de gastrite por Helicobacter pylori e de cólica do lactente. Não há evidências suficientes para recomendar o uso de probióticos na prevenção e no tratamento da dermatite atópica. A utilização de probióticos nos casos de constipação, síndrome do intestino irritável, doença inflamatória intestinal e infecções extraintestinais requer mais estudos. CONCLUSÕES: A duração da administração, a dosagem microbiana e as espécies utilizadas necessitam de maior validação, tanto para probióticos quanto para prebióticos. Alegações de saúde injustificadas são uma grande ameaça ao conceito de pro e prebióticos.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of probiotics and prebiotics on the health of children. SOURCES: MEDLINE and LILACS were searched for relevant English and French-language articles. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: Human milk is rich in prebiotic oligosaccharides and may contain some probiotics. No data suggest that addition of probiotics to infant formula may be harmful, but evidence of its efficacy is insufficient for its recommendation. Since data suggest that addition of specific prebiotic oligosaccharides may reduce infections and atopy in healthy infants, their addition to infant formula seems reasonable. Long-term health benefits of pro- and prebiotics on the developing immune system remain to be proven. Selected probiotics reduce the duration of infectious diarrhea by 1 day, but evidence in prevention is lacking, except in antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Some specific probiotics prevent necrotizing enterocolitis, and other microorganisms may be beneficial in Helicobacter pylori gastritis and in infantile colic. Evidence is insufficient to recommend probiotics in prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis. The use of probiotics in constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and extra-intestinal infections requires more studies. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of administration, microbial dosage, and species used need further validation for both pro- and prebiotics. Unjustified health claims are a major threat for the pro- and prebiotic concept.

Probiotics and prebiotics in prevention and treatment of diseases in infants and children.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of probiotics and prebiotics on the health of children. SOURCES: MEDLINE and LILACS were searched for relevant English and French-language articles. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: Human milk is rich in prebiotic oligosaccharides and may contain some probiotics. No data suggest that addition of probiotics to infant formula may be harmful, but evidence of its efficacy is insufficient for its recommendation. Since data suggest that addition of specific prebiotic oligosaccharides may reduce infections and atopy in healthy infants, their addition to infant formula seems reasonable. Long-term health benefits of pro- and prebiotics on the developing immune system remain to be proven. Selected probiotics reduce the duration of infectious diarrhea by 1 day, but evidence in prevention is lacking, except in antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Some specific probiotics prevent necrotizing enterocolitis, and other microorganisms may be beneficial in Helicobacter pylori gastritis and in infantile colic. Evidence is insufficient to recommend probiotics in prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis. The use of probiotics in constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and extra-intestinal infections requires more studies. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of administration, microbial dosage, and species used need further validation for both pro- and prebiotics. Unjustified health claims are a major threat for the pro- and prebiotic concept.

Hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection in relation to the maternal trimester in which the maternal primary infection occurred.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work was to study the relation between maternal trimester of primary infection with cytomegalovirus and the occurrence of sensorineural hearing loss in the congenitally infected offspring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive live-born children diagnosed with a congenital cytomegalovirus infection after maternal primary cytomegalovirus infections were included in the study. Five were lost for follow-up, and 1 died. Of the remaining 28 congenitally infected children, an estimation of the maternal trimester in which cytomegalovirus primary infection occurred was performed. All of the children were investigated for potential sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS: Five of the maternal infections occurred in the first trimester, 12 in the second trimester, and 11 in the third trimester of pregnancy. Sensorineural hearing loss was detected in 4 (80%) of the 5 congenitally infected children who were infected after a primary maternal infection in the first trimester of pregnancy and in 1 (8%) of the 12 children when the maternal infection occurred in the second trimester of pregnancy. No sensorineural hearing loss was detected after primary maternal infection occurring in the third trimester. Fluctuation and improvement of sensorineural hearing loss were seen regardless the trimester of pregnancy during which maternal primary infection occurred. Progression of sensorineural hearing loss occurred in 2 children born after a maternal primary infection of the first trimester. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing loss seemed more common in infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection who were born to women who experienced a primary cytomegalovirus infection in the first trimester of pregnancy than when infection took place later in pregnancy.

A 10-year prospective study of sensorineural hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, characteristics, and evolution of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in infants with a congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV). STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective 10-year study, 14 021 unselected live-born infants were screened for cCMV by virus isolation in urine. Congenitally infected newborns were evaluated for SNHL during the first 5 years of life. RESULTS: A total of 74 of the 14 021 infants (0.53%) were congenitally infected; of these, 4 (5.4%) were symptomatic at birth. Hearing testing could be performed in 60 of the infants. SNHL was found in 21% of the asymptomatic and in 33% of symptomatic congenitally infected infants. Late-onset hearing loss was detected in 5%, progression in 11%, fluctuation in 16%, and improved hearing threshold in 18% of the infants with cCMV. SNHL was observed in 15% of infected infants born after a maternal primary infection, in 7% born after a maternal recurrent infection, and in 40% after a maternal infection of indeterminate timing. CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, 0.53% of the infants had cCMV infection, 22% of whom developed SNHL. Long-term follow up and repeated audiologic testing is needed, because progression, fluctuation, improvement, and late-onset hearing loss are important features of cCMV infection. The search for a neonatal screening program to detect all cCMV is worthwhile.

A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of two dosing regimens of cisapride and their effects on corrected QT interval in premature infants.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of two dosing regimens of cisapride and their effects on QT(c) interval. DESIGN: Thirty-one pre-term infants were enrolled in two neonatal intensive care units. In 16 infants, cisapride was started at 0.2 mg/kg orally every 6 h (group A) and in 15 infants at 0.1 mg/kg orally every 3 h (group B). Electrocardiograms were performed before and after 72 h of treatment to calculate the QT(c) interval according to the Bazett formula. After 72 h of treatment, cisapride and norcisapride trough concentrations, and concentrations 1 h after the next cisapride administration were quantified in serum. A linear regression analysis was performed to analyse the effect of postnatal and postconception age. RESULTS: At the start of cisapride treatment, mean postnatal age was 22.9+/-13.9 days (mean+/-SD) for group A and 23.3+/-15.0 days for group B, and mean postconception age was 34.0+/-1.8 weeks for group A and 33.3+/-0.8 weeks for group B. The QT(c) interval increased equally in both groups (group A: +37+/-20 ms, and group B: + 38+/-25 ms; P=0.9). Mean concentration of cisapride 1 h after administration was, as expected from the dosing regimen, significantly higher in group A than in group B (123.7+/-43.2 ng/ml versus 86.7+/-27.8 ng/ml; P=0.03).The difference in trough concentration was not significant (107.4+/-44.3 ng/ml versus 78.2+/-35.4 ng/ml; P=0.09). There was a positive correlation between QT(c) prolongation and cisapride serum concentration (peak: R(2)=0.20, P=0.015; trough: R(2)=0.24, P=0.008) and an inverse correlation between postnatal age and concentration 1 h after administration concentration of cisapride (R(2)=0.19, P=0.02). No correlation was found for postconception age. CONCLUSION: Postnatal age has an inverse relationship with cisapride serum concentration in premature infants, whereas postconception age is not correlated. The maturation process of the biotransformation system of cisapride during the first weeks of life, triggered by birth, but independent of gestational age at birth can explain this observation. The effect of cisapride on cardiac repolarisation is positively related with the cisapride serum concentration. Administering cisapride every 3 h instead of every 6 h could be advantageous, as it is associated with lower peak cisapride serum concentrations. Further investigations are required to confirm this and its potential clinical benefit on QT(c )and arrhythmia risk.