Omalizumab in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid resistant to first-line therapy: a French national multicentre retrospective study of 100 patients.

BACKGROUND: Interest in the use of omalizumab to treat bullous pemphigoid (BP) in the event of resistance or contraindication to conventional therapies is currently based on limited evidence. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in BP and to identify predictive factors in response to treatment. METHODS: We conducted a French national multicentre retrospective study including patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BP treated with omalizumab after failure of one or several treatment lines. We excluded patients with clinically atypical BP, as per Vaillant's criteria. The criteria for clinical response to omalizumab were defined according to the 2012 international consensus conference. Anti-BP180-NC16A IgE enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed on sera collected before initiating omalizumab, when available. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2021, 100 patients treated in 18 expert departments were included. Median age at diagnosis was 77 years (range 20-98). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 77% of patients, and partial remission in an additional 9%. CR was maintained 'off therapy' in 11.7%, 'on minimal therapy' in 57.1%, and 'on non-minimal therapy' in 31.2%. Median time to CR was 3 months (range 2.2-24.5). Relapse rate was 14%, with a median follow-up time of 12 months (range 6-73). Adverse events occurred in four patients. CR was more frequently observed in patients with an increased serum baseline level of anti-BP180-NC16A IgE (75% vs. 41%; P = 0.011). Conversely, urticarial lesions, blood total IgE concentration or eosinophil count were not predictive of CR. Patients with an omalizumab dosage > 300 mg every 4 weeks showed a similar final outcome to those with a dosage ≤ 300 mg every 4 weeks, but control of disease activity [median 10 days (range 5-30) vs. 15 days (range 10-60); P < 0.001] and CR [median 2.4 months (range 2.2-8.2) vs. 3.9 months (range 2.3-24.5); P < 0.001] were achieved significantly faster. CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest series to date of BP treated by omalizumab and confirm its effectiveness and safety in this indication. Serum baseline level of anti-BP180-NC16A IgE may predict response to treatment.

Mixed muco-cutaneous pemphigoid: Clinical and immunological features of 15 cases.

Introduction: We describe a series of patients whose auto-immune bullous skin disease (AIBD) of the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) was characterized by clinical, immunological and ultrastructural features intermediate between bullous pemphigoid (BP) and mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), and a recalcitrant course. Patients and Methods: From the database of the French reference centre for AIBD, we screened all the patients who were referred for an AIBD of the DEJ with a mucosal involvement, who neither met the diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of BP, nor were typical of MMP. Sera were analysed by NC16A-ELISA and immunobloting against the C-terminal and LAD-1 parts of BP180. Skin biopsies were studied by direct immunoelectron microscopy (IEM). Results: Fifteen patients (4 males, 11 females) of mean age 70.8 ± 11.8 years were included. The mucosal involvement was localized in oral cavity in all cases and in pharyngeal/laryngeal or genital area in 8 (53%), and 6 patients (40%), respectively. No patient had ocular involvement, nor atrophic or fibrosing scars. All patients had extensive skin lesions (mean BPDAI score =65.9 ± 24.4), which predominated on the upper body part. Direct IEM performed on 8 patients showed IgG deposits on the lamina lucida in all cases, and the lamina densa in 5 cases. All sera recognized NC16A, while none recognized BP-230 in ELISA. 10 out of the 13 tested sera (76.9%) contained IgG which recognized the C-terminal domain of BP180 and 10 sera (76.9%) the LAD-1 domain of BP180. Patients poorly responded to super potent topical corticosteroids and were treated with oral corticosteroids ± immunosuppressant in 13 cases (86.6%). Conclusion: This mixed muco-cutaneous pemphigoid differs from BP by the younger age of patients, multiple mucosae involvement, circulating antibodies against both the C- and N-terminal part of BP180, and very poor response to topical CS. It differs from MMP by extensive inflammatory skin lesions, absence of ocular involvement and atrophic/fibrosing scars.

Real-life impact of immunologic tests to predict relapse after treatment cessation in patients with bullous pemphigoid: A French multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: A high level of anti-BP180 antibodies on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a persistent positive direct immunofluorescence at the end of treatment (immunologic tests, [ITs]) are predictors of relapse after treatment cessation (TC) in patients with bullous pemphigoid. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-life impact of the immunologic-based decision of TC on the 3- and 6-month relapse rates after TC in bullous pemphigoid. METHODS: Retrospective multicentric study included patients followed almost 6 months after TC. Patients were classified according to whether the TC decision was in accordance with the results of ITs performed during the 3 months before TC, despite the results of ITs or without ITs performed. RESULTS: We included 238 patients. Three months after TC, 36 patients showed relapse: 14 of 95 patients with TC in accordance with IT results (14.7%); 5 of 21 with TC despite ITs (23.8%); and 17 of 122 with TC without ITs (13.9%; P = .5). Six months after TC, the relapse rate was 18.9%, 28.6%, and 18.9% (P = .56), respectively, in the 3 groups. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective design and the limited follow up. CONCLUSION: In real-life practice, in bullous pemphigoid, the 3- and 6-month relapse rates were not significantly reduced with TC decision based on results of ITs as compared with a classic clinical-based decision.

[Cardiotoxicity of chemotherapies]. / Effets indésirables cardiaques des chimiothérapies.

The spectrum of chemotherapy's cardiac side effect of chemotherapy has expanded with the new combinations of cytotoxic and targeted therapies over the past 10 years. Moreover, cancer therapy administrated to "new" populations, especially elderly patients or patients with cardiovascular disease and/or coronary artery disease history, has increased considerably. According to the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), patients receiving chemotherapy can be considered in the A group of heart failure. Many cardiovascular adverse effects appear with cancer therapy and suspend treatment purchase, or leading to an alteration of quality of life, and increasing mortality risks. The most clinically evident cardiotoxicity and best known is the anthracyclines adverse effect. Other cytotoxic are associated with a significant risk of cardiovascular complications include alkylating agents such as 5-fluorouracil and paclitaxel. Cardiovascular adverse effects are associated with the use of targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors: trastuzumab, bevacizumab. At the same time, drugs used to hematological malignancies, as acid all-trans-retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide are cardiotoxics. The most serious cardiac complications of cancer therapies is heart congestive failure, mainly due to the use of anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab, usually at high doses. Myocardial ischemia is mainly caused by interferon and antimetabolites. Other side effects may occur such as hypotension, hypertension, arrhythmias and conduction disturbances, pericarditis, and thromboembolic complications.

[Adverse effects of new biological therapies for non-small-cell bronchial cancer]. / Effets indésirables des nouvelles thérapeutiques biologiques du cancer bronchique non à petites cellules.

Biological therapies targeted at bronchial cancer have a mode of action different from that of the various types of chemotherapies and are therefore associated with different types of toxicity. EGFR inhibitors cause mainly cutaneous toxicity, which can be controlled by cyclin and local care. Antiangiogenic agents increase the risk of arterial thrombosis and the risk of minor (nosebleeds) or severe (hemoptysis) bleeding. Hypertension is also a frequent side effect, generally controlled by standard antihypertensive treatment, preferably calcium channel blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Combined management by an oncologist, specialists in the relevant organs (lungs, heart, and skin) and a general practitioner is essential for optimal management of these frequent but rarely severe drug events.