The association between perceived patient-centered care and symptoms experienced by patients undergoing anti-cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: Cancer patients undergoing active anti-cancer treatment experience multiple symptoms concurrently. Over the years, studies to improve patients' physical and psychological discomfort by focusing on patients' needs and preferences have reported promising outcomes. This study aims to explore perceived patient-centered care and its association to symptoms experienced by cancer patients undergoing active anti-cancer treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at an outpatient cancer center between August 2018 and July 2019 among adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and biological therapy. Participants were asked by their oncology nurse to complete a self-administered questionnaire which included the three subscales (physical, psychological, and global distress) of the Memorial Symptoms Assessment Scale as well as the perceived patient-centered care questionnaire. To examine the association between participants' perceived patient-centered care and each of the symptoms scale scores, three hierarchical (block-wise) linear regression models were performed. RESULTS: Of the 125 participants, 57 (45.6%) were diagnosed with breast cancer and were treated with chemotherapy either alone (n = 62, 49.6%), with radiotherapy (n = 4, 3.2%), or with biological therapy (n = 45, 36.0%). Hierarchical regression models found that perceived patient-centered care contributed to 11.3%, ß = - .351 (p < 0.001); 8.9%, ß = - .311 (p < 0.001); and 10.3% ß = -.336 (p < 0.001) of the variance of the global distress index, physical symptoms, and psychological symptoms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the importance of perceived patient-centered care in alleviating physical and psychological symptoms and overall distress in cancer patients undergoing active anti-cancer therapy. Our findings call for oncology teams to adopt and implement patient-centered care as part of their routine work.

Patient's Utilization of Primary Care: A Profile of Clinical and Administrative Reasons for Visits in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Data on patients' utilization of health services in primary care is relevant to planning healthcare. Data may be collected by numerous methods, but obtaining a true picture of content of care has practical difficulties. OBJECTIVES: To describe patient's reasons for visits to primary care physicians (PCPs) as presented by the patient; and to examine the effect of patient-, doctor- and clinic-related variables on the reasons for the visit. METHODS: Visits to PCPs were observed by peer doctors during 2014, at primary care clinics in Israel. Data were collected on characteristics of physicians, patients, clinics, type of visit, and reasons for visit. RESULTS: Eleven physicians from 7 clinics participated in the study. Data were gathered from 327 visits. Patients visited for a wide variety of reasons. The most common acute complaints were upper respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal, skin symptoms, and back and neck problems. The most common chronic complaints were hypertension and diabetes. Patients presented with administrative requests in 36% of visits; 15% were for solely administrative issues. A total of 26.6% of visits included requests for blood tests or discussion of tests. Patients initiated preventive medicine issues in 5% of visits. Visits for chronic problems were directly correlated with patient age and the extent of acquaintance with the physician. Gender-associated differences were also found: women were more likely to visit for a new medical problem than men, while men were more likely to visit for known or chronic problems. CONCLUSIONS: Patients visit their PCP for a wide variety of reasons, often during the same visit. Patients refer for administrative requests in about a third of visits. They initiate preventive care infrequently (1 out of 20 visits). To further characterize patient utilization of primary care, a broader study needs to be performed.

Can outcome-based continuing medical education improve performance of immigrant physicians?

INTRODUCTION: Immigrant physicians are a valued resource for physician workforces in many countries. Few studies have explored the education and training needs of immigrant physicians and ways to facilitate their integration into the health care system in which they work. Using an educational program developed for immigrant civilian physicians working in military primary care clinics at the Israel Defence Force, we illustrate how an outcome-based CME program can address practicing physicians' needs for military-specific primary care education and improve patient care. METHODS: Following an extensive needs assessment, a 3-year curriculum was developed. The curriculum was delivered by a multidisciplinary educational team. Pre/post multiple-choice examinations, objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE), and end-of-program evaluations were administered for curriculum evaluation. To evaluate change in learners' performance, data from the 2003 (before-program) and 2006 (after-program) work-based assessments were retrieved retrospectively. Change in the performance of program participants was compared with that of immigrant physicians who did not participate in the program. RESULTS: Out of 28 learners, 23 (82%) completed the program. Learners did significantly better in the annual post-tests compared with the pretests (p <.01) and improved their OSCE scores (p <.001). Most program graduates (90%) rated overall satisfaction as very good or excellent. In comparison with nonparticipants, program graduates performed better on work-based assessments (Cohen's d =.63). DISCUSSION: Our intensive, outcome-based, longitudinal CME program has yielded encouraging results. Other medical educators, facing the challenge of integrating immigrant physicians to fit their health care system, may consider adapting our approach.

A shift to ambulatory medical education in Israel.

BACKGROUND: The Council for Higher Education in Israel published an extensive report in 2007, calling for a significant increase of undergraduate medical education in Israel in ambulatory care settings. The objective of this article is to propose an action plan aimed at shifting undergraduate medical education in Israel towards ambulatory education. CONTEXT: The main barriers to increasing ambulatory education in Israel are lack of academic recognition for teaching and excellence, conflict between patient care, income and teaching, lack of an adequate educational infrastructure and faculty in ambulatory care, and insufficient support and involvement of the health organisations. However, there is great potential for developing ambulatory education in Israel based on existing resources: Israel has a well-established primary care network, has chronic disease management programmes, community-based preventive medicine and health promotion activities, and an emerging structure for home, palliative and terminal care in the community. INNOVATION: The proposed action plan presents a framework for enhancing ambulatory education in undergraduate medical education in Israel, and allows site-specific adjustments according to the preferences, resources and capabilities of each of the four medical schools. IMPLICATIONS: A national shift to ambulatory education in Israel can be implemented through the existing coordination mechanism of the four medical schools. A government funding policy that encourages the collaboration between four medical schools will be beneficial both in terms of resource utilisation and the engagement of other stakeholders. The recognition of community services and educational excellence can be advanced by establishing academies of teaching scholars.

[Strive, plan and reach the "Summit": the Faculty Development Program at the Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology].

BACKGROUND: In recent years, faculty development has turned into a central component of medical education and a primary instrument in qualifying physicians to be teachers and educators. The faculty development program at the Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine ("Summit" program) was established in order to improve teaching of the clinical professions, to create a community of medical teachers and educators and to develop leadership in medical education within the Faculty of Medicine. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to describe the design, implementation and evaluation of the faculty development program in the Technion's Faculty of Medicine. METHODS: The program was designed for a group of 20 clinical teachers, of various clinical professions, who had gained at least one year of undergraduate teaching experience and wished to develop a career in medical education. The program included seven monthly, eight-hour meetings throughout the academic year. Learning was based on small group discussions, interactive exercises, role-plays and simulations, self-directed reading and reflective writing. At the end of the final meeting, participants completed an evaluation form. RESULTS: Seventeen of the 20 participants (85%) graduated and received certificates. Learners' overall satisfaction was high. Graduates expressed high motivation to practice medical education within the Faculty of Medicine and reported that they gained new knowledge in medical education and skills regarding various aspects of teaching and learning, such as formulation of learning objectives, designing role plays, and providing effective feedback. CONCLUSIONS: The "Summit" program is an innovative initiative in the field of medical education in Israel. The program had a significant impact on participants' knowledge, teaching skills and attitudes. In order to ensure implementation of the acquired tools and skills, its shortterm and long-term effects on teaching behavior and the learning climate have yet to be demonstrated. In addition, it is necessary to check if the program affected the faculty as an organization, promoted changes in curricula, teaching and evaluation methods.

[The encounter between literature and medicine--from theory to practice].

The relationship between literature and medicine has existed from Ancient Greece to the 19th century. However, in the last two centuries, the scientific achievements in medicine, along with the dominance of the biological model in medical education, have weakened this relationship. In the last quarter of the 20th century "Literature and Medicine" has made a comeback in an effort to restore the humanistic component to medical education. "Literature and Medicine" is a subdiscipline of literary studies and a part of "medical humanities". It focuses on issues such as; the physician, the patient, doctor-patient communication, empathy, ethics and life perspective. The growing interest in "Literature and Medicine" is evident not only in undergraduate medical education, but also in many publications in medical journals, and in the increasing number of literature and medicine groups for health care professionals. A "Literature and Medicine" group for physicians and other health care providers has been active for 4 years in the Faculty of Medicine at the Technion in Haifa. So far, the group has read and discussed about thirty literary works. The participants stress how this activity enhances exposure to literature, generates a commitment to reading and leads to a better understanding of literary texts.

[The Objective Structured Clinical Examination and its potential applications as an assessment and feedback tool for IDF primary care physicians--a pilot study].

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the Israel Defense Forces IDF developed special training programs for junior military physicians at the beginning of their service and CME courses for senior military physicians. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a well established assessment tool in medical education that can be of vast use in military training programs for primary care physicians. AIM: To evaluate the OSCE as an assessment tool of military primary care physicians. METHODS: Forty-one military primary care physicians completed a 10-station OSCE. The clinical scenario choices were based on the most prevalent problems in the annual statistics of the Israeli Medical Corps between the years 1988-1998. Each station consisted of two parts: a doctor-SP (standardized patient) encounter and a written exercise. Both parts were evaluated by checklists designed and validated by a committee of OSCE experts and senior military physicians. RESULTS: The overall reliability of the exam was alpha = .88. The examinees highly valued the relevance of the scenarios to their every day practice (4.38 out of 5.0) and the reliability of the standardized patients (4.0 out of 5.0). A total of 92% request feedback on their performance. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study found the OSCE to be a feasible, valid and reliable tool that can serve to assess the capability of physicians to deal with major issues in military primary health care. The OSCE can also play a major role in structured feedback provided to these physicians.

[A review of the evidence based smoking cessation interventions delivered by the family physician].

Smoking is one of the most preventable causes of morbidity and mortality resulting in almost 10,000 deaths each year in Israel. Since tobacco-related disease is preventable, efforts to promote cessation in patients who smoke should be a routine step in preventive primary care measures. In Israel, 26% of the adult population smoke. Within this group, a third want to quit but only two percent succeed in abstaining from smoking for a whole year. Family physicians are in an ideal position to facilitate patients' attempts to quit smoking: 70% of smoking patients report that firm, supportive messages from their family physician can act as an important motivating factor to quit smoking. The updated Clinical Practice Guidelines from the US Public Health Service recommend that family physicians should opportunistically advise smokers to stop smoking during routine consultation, encourage and assist smokers in the use of nicotine replacement therapies or bupropion and refer smokers to professional behavioral or psychological counselors specializing in smoking cessation. Most physicians rank smoking as the most important behavior affecting health, but few physicians are confident in their own ability to help their patients stop smoking. In this review the authors present several evidence-based strategies that were found to be helpful in promoting smoking cessation when delivered by general practitioners. The power of the physician's advice, first and second line agents, behavioral counseling and stage based interventions, are all discussed in detail.