Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
Brain Sci ; 13(3)2023 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36979231

ABSTRACT

Limited studies have investigated the effects of cannabis use on driving among older adults, who represent the fastest growing segment of drivers globally. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exposure on risks of (1) motor vehicle collisions (MVC) and (2) culpability for MVCs among adults 50 years and older. Three reviewers screened 7022 studies identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO. Odds Ratios (OR) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method in Review Manager 5.4.1. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tool was used to assess the quality of each study. Seven cross-sectional studies were included. Three studies evaluated culpability while four evaluated MVC. The pooled risk of MVC was not significantly different between THC-positive and THC-negative older drivers (OR, 95% CI 1.15 [0.40, 3.31]; I2 = 72%). In culpability studies, THC exposure was not significantly associated with an increased risk of being culpable for MVC among adults over the age of 50 (OR, 95% CI 1.24 [0.95, 1.61]; I2 = 0%). Inspection of funnel plots did not indicate publication bias. Our review found that THC exposure was not associated with MVC involvement nor with culpability for MVCs.

2.
Can J Psychiatry ; 68(3): 152-162, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35996823

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Caring Contacts are an emerging intervention that aims to reduce distress and suicide risk after acute psychiatric care. This trial aimed to determine whether, during a pandemic, there was any evidence that the mental health benefits and reduction in suicidal ideation (SI) associated with delivering Caring Contacts to recently discharged psychiatric patients were greater than a control communication. The secondary objective was to identify whether the predicted benefits were greater among people living alone or those diagnosed with depression. METHOD: A single-site pilot randomized clinical trial (n = 100), with patients recruited from the adult Inpatient Psychiatry Unit at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada between August 2020 and May 2021. Participants were randomized (1:1) to the Caring Contact or control group. Participants received three Caring Contact or control communications via email or mail (on days 4, 21, and 56 post-discharge). Mental health symptoms were assessed using the self-report Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) scores at discharge (baseline) and when participants received each communication. Analysis of variance was used for the primary comparisons and exploratory analyses for subgroups. RESULTS: Both groups experienced a significant worsening of mental health symptoms at all time points post-discharge relative to baseline. There were no significant differences between groups at any time point, however, on day 4 there was a 24.2% and 72.6% attenuated worsening in the Caring Contact group compared to the control group for total symptom severity and SI, respectively. There was no significant interaction effect for the depression subgroup or those living alone. CONCLUSIONS: While this pilot study was not powered to identify significant differences between groups, results are indicative of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and provide some indication that Caring Contacts may have benefited patients in the days following discharge, supporting the need for larger-scale trials. The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (study ID NCT04456062).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Adult , Humans , Pilot Projects , Aftercare , Patient Discharge
3.
BMC Psychiatry ; 22(1): 189, 2022 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35300649

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the risk of readmission in patients with severe mental disorders, compare it between patients using different types of antipsychotics and determine risk factors for psychiatric readmission. METHODS: Medical records of a non-concurrent cohort of 625 patients with severe mental disorders (such as psychoses and severe mood disorders) who were first discharged from January to December 2012 (entry into the cohort), with longitudinal follow-up until December 2017 constitute the sample. Descriptive statistical analysis of characteristics of study sample was performed. The risk factors for readmission were assessed using Cox regression. RESULTS: Males represented 51.5% of the cohort, and 75.6% of the patients had no partner. Most patients (89.9%) lived with relatives, and 64.7% did not complete elementary school. Only 17.1% used more than one antipsychotic, 34.2% did not adhere to the treatment, and 13.9% discontinued the medication due to unavailability in public pharmacies. There was a need to change the antipsychotic due to the lack of therapeutic response (11.2% of the patients) and adverse reactions to the antipsychotic (5.3% of the patients). Cox regression showed that the risk of readmission was increased by 25.0% (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.52) when used typical antipsychotics, compared to those who used atypical ones, and by 92.0% (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.63-2.27) when patients did not adhere to maintenance treatment compared to those who adhered. CONCLUSIONS: Use of atypical antipsychotics and adherence to treatment were associated with a lower risk of psychiatric readmissions.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Mental Disorders , Psychotic Disorders , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Patient Readmission , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Risk Factors
4.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 21(4): 743-751, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32779944

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a need to evaluate the health equity of atypical antipsychotics users who obtain their medicines from the Brazilian National Health System (SUS) through the identification of key factors that influence their health status due to concerns with equity of care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study among patients attending state pharmacies in Brazil. Individuals were included if they used atypical antipsychotics, aged ≥18 years, and answered the EQ-5D-3 L questionnaire. Sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical data were collected. The dependent variable was health status. Associations between the independent variables and the dependent variable were analyzed by adjusting a linear regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 388 individuals met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The final multiple linear regression model demonstrated a statistically significant association between VAS and suicide attempts, private care, current antipsychotics, comorbidities, and perceived family support. EXPERT COMMENTARY: The study identified several factors both individual and collective that correlate with the health status of atypical antipsychotic users and confirmed the importance of providing medicines for treating psychotic disorders. However, other factors are involved including social support. Our results suggest additional activities and policies are necessary including strategies to address the differences in private and public health care.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Health Equity , Health Status , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Adult , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
5.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 42(6): 599-607, Nov.-Dec. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1132149

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess health-related quality of life and associated factors in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics, as well as to determine utility values using the EuroQol-5D-3L instrument. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a state-run pharmacy in the Brazilian National Health System. Individuals were included if they were using a single atypical antipsychotic and completed the EuroQol-5D-3L. Sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical data were collected. The dependent variable was the EuroQol-5D-3L utility score. Associations between the independent variables and the dependent variable were analyzed in a multiple linear regression model. Results: A total of 394 patients were included, and their mean utility score was 0.664±0.232. Patients treated with clozapine had the highest mean score (0.762 [0.202]), followed by olanzapine (0.687 [0.230]), risperidone (0.630 [0.252]), ziprasidone (0.622 [0.234]), and quetiapine (0.620 [0.243]). The following variables were related to higher utility scores: income, employment, clozapine use, no illicit psychoactive substance use, no suicide attempts, and no comorbidities. Conclusion: Evaluating health-related quality of life differences in the available atypical antipsychotics can facilitate the choice of treatment, improve health outcomes, and ensure rational prescriptions.


Subject(s)
Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quetiapine Fumarate
6.
Braz J Psychiatry ; 42(6): 599-607, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556003

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess health-related quality of life and associated factors in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics, as well as to determine utility values using the EuroQol-5D-3L instrument. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a state-run pharmacy in the Brazilian National Health System. Individuals were included if they were using a single atypical antipsychotic and completed the EuroQol-5D-3L. Sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical data were collected. The dependent variable was the EuroQol-5D-3L utility score. Associations between the independent variables and the dependent variable were analyzed in a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 394 patients were included, and their mean utility score was 0.664±0.232. Patients treated with clozapine had the highest mean score (0.762 [0.202]), followed by olanzapine (0.687 [0.230]), risperidone (0.630 [0.252]), ziprasidone (0.622 [0.234]), and quetiapine (0.620 [0.243]). The following variables were related to higher utility scores: income, employment, clozapine use, no illicit psychoactive substance use, no suicide attempts, and no comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Evaluating health-related quality of life differences in the available atypical antipsychotics can facilitate the choice of treatment, improve health outcomes, and ensure rational prescriptions.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Schizophrenia , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Quality of Life , Quetiapine Fumarate , Schizophrenia/drug therapy
7.
Psychiatr Serv ; 70(11): 1053-1056, 2019 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31357920

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study examined recent growth in demand for acute mental health and addiction (MHA) care in a large urban center and changes in patient flow following the expansion of a psychiatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: A retrospective observational design used administrative data in adjusted negative binomial regression models to identify time trends at seven hospitals over a 6-year period in central Toronto. Two-part linear spline models compared trends before and after a psychiatric ED expansion. RESULTS: Per capita MHA-related ED visits grew rapidly across the acute care system over the study period, although admissions per MHA ED visit decreased. Expanding a psychiatric ED did not influence overall system-level growth, but it significantly shifted traffic; the annual MHA ED visit growth rate increased at the expanded ED while decreasing at surrounding hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Given increasing demand systemwide, individual hospital ED expansions may be inappropriate; planning should consider the whole system.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Humans , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health , Ontario , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy
8.
J Affect Disord ; 241: 103-109, 2018 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30107350

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ketamine is known to rapidly reduce depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation (SI) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but evidence is limited for its acceptability and effectiveness in "real-world" settings. This case series examines serial ketamine infusions in reducing SI and depression scores in adults with MDD admitted to a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Five inpatients with MDD and SI admitted to hospital in Toronto, Canada received six infusions of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous (IV) ketamine (n = 5) over approximately 12 days, in addition to treatment-as-usual. Suicide and depression rating scores (Scale for Suicidal Ideation, SSI; Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, MADRS) were obtained at baseline, on treatment days, on days 14 and 42 (primary endpoint). RESULTS: All patients experienced benefit with ketamine. SSI scores diminished by 84% from 14.0 ±â€¯4.5 at baseline to 2.2 ±â€¯2.5 at study endpoint. MADRS scores diminished by 47% from 42.2 ±â€¯5.3 at baseline to 22.4 ±â€¯8.0. Two patients withdrew from the study, one to initiate electroconvulsive therapy and one due to an adverse event (dissociative effects) during the ketamine infusion. LIMITATIONS: The major limitation of this study is the small sample size. DISCUSSION: These preliminary pilot data are promising with a greater than two-fold reduction in SI following ketamine infusions. They demonstrate that six serial ketamine infusions may be safe and feasible. These findings support the need for large scale randomized controlled trials to confirm the efficacy of serial ketamine for treatment of SI in "real-world" settings.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/therapeutic use , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide Prevention , Adult , Canada , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Young Adult
9.
BMC Psychiatry ; 14: 63, 2014 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24592853

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a widely used measure of psychiatric symptoms and functioning, yet numerous concerns persist about its reliability and validity. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which GAF scores reflect physician-related differences in addition to information about patients. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of clinical data collected between 2005 and 2010 from inpatients at a psychiatric hospital (N = 1,852). Multilevel modeling was used to estimate the influence of physicians on GAF scores at admission and on the change between admission and discharge, controlling for patient clinical presentation. RESULTS: Controlling for patient-level predictors, 7% of the residual variance in admission GAF scores and 8% of the residual variance in change scores was at the physician level. The physician-level variance was significantly larger than zero in both models. CONCLUSIONS: Although statistically significant, estimates of physician-level variance were not overwhelming, suggesting that the GAF was rated in a consistent manner across physicians in this hospital. While results lend support to the utility of the GAF for drawing comparisons between patients seen by different physicians across a large institution, further study is necessary to determine generalizability and to assess differences across multiple institutions.


Subject(s)
Inpatients/psychology , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multilevel Analysis , Patient Admission , Patient Discharge , Psychiatry , Reproducibility of Results , Workforce , Young Adult
10.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 44(4): 375-83, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23098381

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to validate and compare performance of four screening tools for mental disorders in a heterogeneous population seeking substance use treatment. A total of 544 clients were recruited prospectively from three treatment centres and completed the screening instruments followed by a reference standard psychiatric interview for research diagnosis. Performance relative to the reference standard was compared across instruments using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Screening tools included the GAIN-SS-IDScr; the K6, the Psychiatric Sub-scale of the Addiction Severity Index, and the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. All the screening tools performed reasonably well detecting broad groupings of disorders-any past-month disorder, any depressive disorder, anxiety disorder or psychotic disorder, with the GAIN-SS-IDScr being most efficient due to its shorter length. Results strengthen previous validation data for each of the tools investigated and support their use in detecting mental disorders in the substance use treatment population specifically.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/psychology , Area Under Curve , Breath Tests , Cognition/physiology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Marital Status , Mental Disorders/complications , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Selection , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
11.
Curr HIV Res ; 10(8): 708-12, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23092174

ABSTRACT

Illicit drug use in HIV-infected patients can be linked to impairment of physical and mental health, low health related quality of life, and suboptimal adherence to HIV treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation of self report illicit drug use, urinalysis for cocaine and cannabis metabolites, and severity of dependence among HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in a treatment center in Brazil. Four hundred and thirty-eight outpatients of an HIV referral center were interviewed and assessed for drug use (lifetime, last year and last month). Urinalysis was performed to detect the presence of cocaine and cannabis metabolites in urine samples. Overall agreement between self report and urinalysis was almost 68% for cannabis and higher than 85% for cocaine. Positive urinalysis was significantly associated with more than once a week cannabis (p< .0001) and cocaine (p< .0001) use during the last-month. Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) properly predicted positive cocaine urinalysis results (area under the curve [AUC] = .81, p = .0001). Frequency of cannabis and cocaine use, SDS score degree and positive urinalysis for both drugs were correlated. Our findings suggest that positive self-report is a reliable predictor of positive urine sample both for cannabis and cocaine, but since the agreement was not perfect, there is a role for urine drug screening in the care of patients with HIV-related conditions.


Subject(s)
Cocaine-Related Disorders/diagnosis , HIV Infections , Marijuana Abuse/diagnosis , Self Report/standards , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , Cocaine-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Cocaine-Related Disorders/urine , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/urine , Middle Aged , Young Adult
12.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 24(4): 376-81, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18814199

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Elderly with depression are at increased risk for cognitive dysfunction and dementia. Smell tests are correlated with performance on cognitive tests in the elderly and therefore might serve as a screening test for cognitive impairment in depressed elderly. PURPOSE: To assess the validity of the CC-SIT (Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test) as a screening test for cognitive impairment in elderly with depression. METHODS: Forty-one patients, aged 60 and over, were assessed with the CC-SIT and CVLT (California Verbal Learning Test) after 3 months treatment of a Major Depressive Episode (DSM-IV) at the Day Hospital for Depression, Baycrest. Patients already diagnosed with dementia, or other psychiatric and neurological disorders, were excluded. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was applied to assess the CC-SIT's accuracy in identifying individuals with impairment (2 SD below the mean for age and education or less) on CVLT delayed recall trials. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (33 women and eight men) were assessed. Mean age was 76.8 (SD: 6.5), mean HRSD scores before treatment was 22.0 (SD: 5.1). Nine patients had impairment on CVLT delayed recall measures. The area under the ROC curve was 0.776 (95% CI = 0.617-0.936). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of the CC-SIT as a screening tool for cognitive impairment among elderly with depression as an indicator for the need of a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Replication with larger samples is necessary.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Dementia/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Mental Recall/physiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Smell , Canada , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Dementia/psychology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Risk Factors
13.
Can J Psychiatry ; 53(12): 800-9, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19087478

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Population health surveys around the world have studied the epidemiology of comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs) and other mental disorders as part of larger efforts to assess needs and direct integrated planning and delivery of services. This study presents the first national assessment in Canada of the prevalence of co-occurring SUDs and other mental disorders, with attention to differences by substance problem severity, sex, age, and region. METHODS: This work is a secondary analysis of data from the 2002 Canadian Community Health Survey: Mental Health and Well-Being. The sample was obtained using a multistage stratified cluster design (n = 36,984, response rate = 77%). RESULTS: The 12-month population prevalence of co-occurring disorders was 1.7%. The 12-month prevalence of other mental disorders was higher among those with illicit drug, relative to alcohol, problems and among those with dependence, compared with those with less severe problems. Sex and age differences mirrored population differences in pure disorders. Salient regional differences included the higher rate of co-occurring disorders in British Columbia and the lower rates in Quebec. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-study comparisons are hampered by methodological differences; however, these Canadian rates are at the lower end of the range reported internationally. This might have resulted from the exclusion of several disorders known to be highly comorbid with SUDs. Nonetheless, prevalence is high in certain subgroups, and efforts under way to improve Canada's substance abuse and mental health services should continue to ensure that adequate attention is directed to the needs of people with co-occurring disorders.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Canada , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Sex Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Young Adult
14.
Addiction ; 103(11): 1847-56, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19032535

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT/BACKGROUND: Research has shown that problem gambling (PG) is associated with substance use disorders (SUD) and also with other mental disorders (MD). Nevertheless, evidence about the relative contribution of each type of disorder for the risk of gambling in the population is very limited. OBJECTIVE: Study the association of SUD, alone and in combination with MD, with the prevalence and severity of PG. DESIGN: Cross-sectional national survey (Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health and Well-Being) data collected through a multi-stage stratified cluster design. SETTING: Population-based household survey. PARTICIPANTS: This analysis includes data on 36 885 participants (99.7% of the survey sample). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence and severity of PG were measured using the Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Prevalence of MD (mood and anxiety disorders) and SUD were defined according to the World Mental Health Survey Initiative Composite International Diagnostic Interview, following definitions of the DSM-IV. RESULTS: Compared to the population, higher prevalence rates of PG are observed when the severity of SUD is higher, but are not impacted by the co-occurrence of MD. For individuals with low risk and moderate risk/problem gambling, the prevalence rate difference (prevalence rate in the subgroup minus prevalence rate in the population) observed among substance dependents was reduced when MD co-occurred (from a prevalence rate difference of 2.5; 99% confidence interval 1.6-3.8 to 1.6; 99% confidence interval 1.2-2.2 for low risk gamblers and from 3.7; 99% confidence interval 1.6-5.5 to 2.9; 99% confidence interval 2.0-4.3 for moderate risk/problem gamblers). Estimates were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of all levels of PG increased with SUD severity, but the pattern did not appear to be affected by MD co-occurrence. Results suggest particular attention be given to SUD in treatment-seeking clients with co-occurring disorders.


Subject(s)
Gambling/psychology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors
15.
Eval Rev ; 32(1): 7-38, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18198169

ABSTRACT

This article examines the effectiveness of quarterly Recovery Management Checkups (RMCs) for people with substance disorders by level of co-occurring mental disorders (34% none, 27% internalizing disorders, and 39% internalizing and externalizing) across two randomized experiments with 92% to 97% follow-up. The 865 participants are 82% African American, 53% female, and age 37 on average. RMC involves identification of those in need of treatment, motivational interviews, and treatment linkage assistance. It is effective in linking participants in need to treatment, with equal or better outcomes among those with more mental disorders. The data support the utility of monitoring and re-intervention for clients with co-occurring disorders.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Chicago/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy
16.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 68(9): 1352-7, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17915973

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This investigation was undertaken to explore the relationship between alcohol/illicit drug dependence and overweight/obesity in individuals with bipolar I disorder. METHOD: The data for this analysis were procured from the Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health and Well-Being (CCHS) conducted by Statistics Canada in 2002. Bipolar I disorder was defined as persons screening positive for a lifetime manic episode using the World Mental Health 2000 version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI). Substance abuse and illicit drug dependence were determined using criteria commensurate with the DSM-IV-TR. Overweight and obesity were defined as a body mass index of 25.0 to 29.9 and greater than or equal to 30.0 kg/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: The total sample comprised 36,984 individuals (>or= 15 years old) screening positive for a lifetime manic episode. Subgroup analysis indicated that overweight/obese bipolar individuals had a significantly lower rate of substance dependence than the normal weight sample (13% vs. 21%, p < .01). Conversely, bipolar individuals who screened positive for substance dependence had a lower rate of overweight/obesity when compared with non-substance-dependent bipolar respondents (39% vs. 54%, p< .01). The inverse association between the presence of these 2 co-morbid conditions in bipolar I disorder continued to be statistically significant in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.95, p < .05). CONCLUSION: An inverse relationship between the presence of comorbid overweight/obesity and substance use disorders was observed in bipolar I disorder. These results suggest that comorbid addictive disorders (i.e., substance use and compulsive overeating) may compete for the same brain reward systems.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Addictive/epidemiology , Behavior, Addictive/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Overweight , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Comorbidity , Demography , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Obesity/psychology , Prevalence , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Psychiatr Serv ; 58(7): 962-9, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17602013

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study contributes to knowledge of the processes underlying help seeking by those with mental and substance use disorders by examining relationships among need, service use, and satisfaction with mental health care in a population-based sample. METHODS: Secondary data analyses were performed on responses to the 2002 Canadian Community Health Survey (N=36,984). Diagnostic algorithms classified respondents by past-year diagnostic status, including substance dependence and selected mood and anxiety disorders. Logistic regressions examined associations between diagnostic status and service use, satisfaction, and unmet need for care. RESULTS: Ten percent of Canadians and 39% of Canadians with a mental disorder or substance dependence sought services in the year preceding data collection. Although those with co-occurring substance dependence and mental disorders reported the poorest mental health and were most likely to seek care, the presence of a mental disorder, regardless of co-occurring substance dependence, contributed primarily to help seeking. Among those who sought services, the use of informal sources of care, including self-help groups, was more common among those with substance dependence. Those with co-occurring disorders reported the lowest satisfaction with care and the greatest prevalence of unmet need. CONCLUSIONS: The differential use of services, satisfaction, and unmet need across diagnostic status allowed for speculation on differing levels of disability and stigma in the help-seeking process for different types of disorders. The strong association between co-occurring disorders and unmet need for care, including a large proportion of respondents who stated they preferred to self-manage their symptoms, is particularly troubling and deserves future research attention.


Subject(s)
Comorbidity , Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Canada , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs
18.
Can J Psychiatry ; 52(1): 22-7, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17444075

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a preliminary study on the validation of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ) among patients seeking treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). METHOD: We assessed 76 patients with SUDs, using the PDSQ, followed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, the psychometric properties identified with the PDSQ in patients with SUDs differed from those found in psychiatric outpatient populations. The ROC curves were calculated for major depressive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and panic disorder. The areas under the curves were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.95; P < 0.001), 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.90; P < 0.001), and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.82; P = 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of the PDSQ to screen for other psychiatric disorders in populations with SUDs is promising but requires larger validation studies to provide data on its psychometric properties and inform the choice of cut-off scores for this population.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/methods , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Truth Disclosure , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis
19.
Psychol Addict Behav ; 20(1): 28-35, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16536662

ABSTRACT

This article describes the prevalence and overlap of psychiatric symptoms among 2,784 clients of the outpatient programs at a comprehensive addictions treatment facility. The psychiatric symptoms were assessed by a computer-based questionnaire, and the analysis focused on the overlap of symptom clusters (multimorbidity) and their relation to selected intake variables known to be predictors of treatment outcome. Of all clients, 27.4% scored positive for 1, 18.9% for 2, and 22.3% for 3 or more clusters, the most frequent being depression, anxiety, and history of conduct disorder. Multimorbidity was significantly correlated with female gender, unemployment, less social support, cannabis problems, fewer legal problems, and increased treatment engagement. Clients with more substance use disorders presented more psychiatric symptoms.


Subject(s)
Comprehensive Health Care/methods , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , Comorbidity , Conduct Disorder/epidemiology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Social Support
20.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ; 8(1): 49-57, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15469666

ABSTRACT

The present study measured prolactin, cortisol, ACTH and growth hormone in healthy male volunteers following an acute oral administration of quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic with high affinity for H1 and moderate affinity for sigma, alpha1, 5-HT2, alpha2 and D2 receptors. Fifteen male volunteers entered this randomized double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study. Blood samples were drawn every 30 min from 09:00 hours to 13:00 hours. The first samples were drawn immediately before the administration of 150 mg quetiapine or placebo. Mean results for each hormone and ANOVA for repeated measures were performed. The area under the curve (AUC) hormonal values were calculated and compared by paired t test. The ANOVA showed an increase of prolactin after quetiapine administration from time 60 min up to the end of the observation period. Cortisol decreased after quetiapine administration from time 150 min to time 240 min. ACTH secretion showed no difference compared to placebo. There was a late increase in growth hormone secretion, significant in comparison with placebo only at time 210 min. The AUC values were statistically different for prolactin and cortisol compared to placebo. A single dose of quetiapine (150 mg) increased prolactin secretion probably due to a transiently high D2 receptor occupancy at the anterior pituitary. Cortisol secretion decreased as was expected from quetiapine's pharmacodynamic profile. The lack of response of ACTH might be, at least in part, explained by the low hormonal assay sensitivity. The late growth hormone increase might have been due to quetiapine's antagonism of H1 receptors.


Subject(s)
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone/blood , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Dibenzothiazepines/pharmacology , Human Growth Hormone/blood , Hydrocortisone/blood , Prolactin/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Arousal/drug effects , Arousal/physiology , Cross-Over Studies , Dibenzothiazepines/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Pituitary Gland/drug effects , Pituitary Gland/physiology , Quetiapine Fumarate , Receptors, Dopamine D2/drug effects , Receptors, Dopamine D2/physiology , Receptors, Histamine H1/drug effects , Receptors, Histamine H1/physiology , Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT2/drug effects , Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT2/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...