Epidemiology and neonatal pain management of heelsticks in intensive care units: EPIPPAIN 2, a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Heelstick is the most frequently performed skin-breaking procedure in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). There are no large multicenter studies describing the frequency and analgesic approaches used for heelsticks performed in NICUs. OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency of heelsticks and their analgesic management in newborns in the NICU. To determine the factors associated with the lack of specific preprocedural analgesia for this procedure. DESIGN: EPIPPAIN 2 (Epidemiology of Procedural PAin In Neonates) is a descriptive prospective epidemiologic study. SETTING: All 16 NICUs in the Paris region in France. PARTICIPANTS: All newborns in the NICU with a maximum corrected age of 44 weeks +6 days of gestation on admission who had at least one heelstick during the study period were eligible for the study. The study included 562 newborns. METHODS: Data on all heelsticks and their corresponding analgesic therapies were prospectively collected. The inclusion period lasted six weeks, from June 2, 2011 to July 12, 2011. Newborns were followed from their admission to the 14th day of their NICU stay or discharge, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: The mean (SD) gestational age was 33.3 (4.4) weeks and duration of participation was 7.5 (4.4) days. The mean (SD; range) of heelsticks per neonate was 16.0 (14.4; 1-86) during the study period. Of the 8995 heelsticks studied, 2379 (26.4%) were performed with continuous analgesia, 5236 (58.2%) with specific preprocedural analgesia. Overall, 6764 (75.2%) heelsticks were performed with analgesia (continuous and/or specific). In a multivariate model, the increased lack of preprocedural analgesia was associated with female sex, term birth, high illness severity, tracheal or noninvasive ventilation, parental absence and use of continuous sedation/analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Heelstick was very frequently performed in NICUs. Although, most heelsticks were performed with analgesia, this was not systematic. The high frequency of this procedure and the known adverse effects of repetitive pain in neonates should encourage the search of safe and effective strategies to reduce their number.

Does neonatal pain management in intensive care units differ between night and day? An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether analgesic use for painful procedures performed in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) differs during nights and days and during each of the 6 h period of the day. DESIGN: Conducted as part of the prospective observational Epidemiology of Painful Procedures in Neonates study which was designed to collect in real time and around-the-clock bedside data on all painful or stressful procedures. SETTING: 13 NICUs and paediatric intensive care units in the Paris Region, France. PARTICIPANTS: All 430 neonates admitted to the participating units during a 6-week period between September 2005 and January 2006. DATA COLLECTION: During the first 14 days of admission, data were collected on all painful procedures and analgesic therapy. The five most frequent procedures representing 38 012 of all 42 413 (90%) painful procedures were analysed. INTERVENTION: Observational study. MAIN OUTCOME ASSESSMENT: We compared the use of specific analgesic for procedures performed during each of the 6 h period of a day: morning (7:00 to 12:59), afternoon, early night and late night and during daytime (morning+afternoon) and night-time (early night+late night). RESULTS: 7724 of 38 012 (20.3%) painful procedures were carried out with a specific analgesic treatment. For morning, afternoon, early night and late night, respectively, the use of analgesic was 25.8%, 18.9%, 18.3% and 18%. The relative reduction of analgesia was 18.3%, p<0.01, between daytime and night-time and 28.8%, p<0.001, between morning and the rest of the day. Parental presence, nurses on 8 h shifts and written protocols for analgesia were associated with a decrease in this difference. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial differences in the use of analgesics around-the-clock may be questioned on quality of care grounds.

Neonatal outcome in preterm monochorionic twins with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome after intrauterine treatment with amnioreduction or fetoscopic laser surgery: comparison with dichorionic twins.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare neonatal outcome in preterm neonates after twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) that was treated by amnioreduction or fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) and in dichorionic neonates who were matched for gestational age at birth. STUDY DESIGN: Neonatal outcome was assessed in 137 TTTS preterm neonates who were treated primarily with either amnioreduction (n = 36) or FLS (n = 101) and compared with dichorionic twins (n = 242) who were delivered at our center at 24-34 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Adverse neonatal outcome (death or severe cerebral lesions) was more frequent in the amnioreduction group than in the FLS and dichorionic groups. Overall neonatal outcome was comparable in FLS and dichorionic infants. However, neonatal morbidity was higher in FLS neonates at <30 weeks of gestation that was related mainly to failed laser therapy. CONCLUSION: In preterm TTTS cases, neonatal morbidity decreases independently with gestational age and after successful FLS. Neonatal morbidity that was specific of TTTS was higher in the amnioreduction group and in cases with failed laser therapy.