Overexpression of transcription factor Sp1 leads to gene expression perturbations and cell cycle inhibition.

BACKGROUND: The ubiquitous transcription factor Sp1 regulates the expression of a vast number of genes involved in many cellular functions ranging from differentiation to proliferation and apoptosis. Sp1 expression levels show a dramatic increase during transformation and this could play a critical role for tumour development or maintenance. Although Sp1 deregulation might be beneficial for tumour cells, its overexpression induces apoptosis of untransformed cells. Here we further characterised the functional and transcriptional responses of untransformed cells following Sp1 overexpression. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We made use of wild-type and DNA-binding-deficient Sp1 to demonstrate that the induction of apoptosis by Sp1 is dependent on its capacity to bind DNA. Genome-wide expression profiling identified genes involved in cancer, cell death and cell cycle as being enriched among differentially expressed genes following Sp1 overexpression. In silico search to determine the presence of Sp1 binding sites in the promoter region of modulated genes was conducted. Genes that contained Sp1 binding sites in their promoters were enriched among down-regulated genes. The endogenous sp1 gene is one of the most down-regulated suggesting a negative feedback loop induced by overexpressed Sp1. In contrast, genes containing Sp1 binding sites in their promoters were not enriched among up-regulated genes. These results suggest that the transcriptional response involves both direct Sp1-driven transcription and indirect mechanisms. Finally, we show that Sp1 overexpression led to a modified expression of G1/S transition regulatory genes such as the down-regulation of cyclin D2 and the up-regulation of cyclin G2 and cdkn2c/p18 expression. The biological significance of these modifications was confirmed by showing that the cells accumulated in the G1 phase of the cell cycle before the onset of apoptosis. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the binding to DNA of overexpressed Sp1 induces an inhibition of cell cycle progression that precedes apoptosis and a transcriptional response targeting genes containing Sp1 binding sites in their promoter or not suggesting both direct Sp1-driven transcription and indirect mechanisms.

Characterization of the ubinuclein protein as a new member of the nuclear and adhesion complex components (NACos).

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: We characterized previously a cellular protein through its interaction with cellular and viral transcription factors from the bZip family. The corresponding mRNA was detected in a wide range of cell types and the protein was highly expressed in the nucleus of human keratinocytes. On the basis of these observations, we named this protein ubinuclein. RESULTS: Using a specific monoclonal antibody, we have shown in the present study that, although endogenous ubinuclein was mainly nuclear in sparse MDCK (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cells, it was exclusively present in the cell-cell junctions in confluent MDCK cultures or in polarized HT29 cells, where it co-localized with the tight junction marker ZO-1 (zonula occludens 1). In accordance with this, we have shown that ubinuclein interacted with ZO-1 in vitro and in vivo. In cultures of undifferentiated human keratinocytes, ubinuclein was essentially nuclear, but in differentiated cells, in which involucrin and periplakin reside at the apical cell membrane and at the cell-cell junctions, ubinuclein staining was observed at the lateral cell-cell borders. In human skin, ubinuclein appeared as a thread-like pattern between the upper granular cell layer and the cornified cell layer. In mouse epithelia, including bile canaliculi, bronchioli, salivary gland ducts, and oral and olfactory epithelium, ubinuclein co-localized with tight junction markers. Ubinuclein was, however, not present in endothelial cell-cell junctions. In addition, when overexpressed, ubinuclein localized to the nucleus and prevented MDCK cells from entering cytokinesis, resulting in multinucleated giant cells after several cycles of endoreplication. CONCLUSIONS: Ubinuclein mRNA and its corresponding protein are expressed in almost all cell types. Analyses have revealed that in most cells ubinuclein occurred in the nucleoplasm, but in cells forming tight junctions it is recruited to the plaque structure of the zonula occludens. This recruitment appeared to be dependent on cell density. Therefore ubinuclein is a new NACos (nuclear and adhesion complex component) protein.

Restriction to Fos family members of Trip6-dependent coactivation and glucocorticoid receptor-dependent trans-repression of activator protein-1.

The term activator protein (AP)-1 describes homodimeric and heterodimeric transcription factors composed of members of the Jun, Fos, and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)/activating transcription factor (ATF) families of proteins. Distinct AP-1 dimers, for instance the prototypical c-Jun:c-Fos and c-Jun:ATF2 dimers, are differentially regulated by signaling pathways and bind related yet distinct response elements in the regulatory regions of AP-1 target genes. Little is known about the dimer-specific regulation of AP-1 activity at the promoter of its target genes. We have previously shown that nTrip6, the nuclear isoform of the LIM domain protein Trip6, acts as an AP-1 coactivator. Moreover, nTrip6 is an essential component of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated trans-repression of AP-1, in that it mediates the tethering of GR to the promoter-bound AP-1. We have now discovered a striking specificity of nTrip6 actions determined by the binding preference of its LIM domains. We show that nTrip6 interacts only with Fos family members. Consequently, nTrip6 is a selective coactivator for AP-1 dimers containing Fos. nTrip6 also assembles activated GR to c-Jun:c-Fos-driven promoters. Neither nTrip6 nor GR are recruited to a promoter occupied by c-Jun:ATF2. Thus, only Fos-containing dimers are trans-repressed by GR. Thus, the dimer composition of AP-1 determines the mechanism of both the positive and negative regulation of AP-1 transcriptional activity. Interestingly, on a second level of action, GR represses the increase in transcriptional activity of c-Jun:ATF2 induced by c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-dependent phosphorylation. This repression depends on GR-mediated induction of MAPK phosphatase 1 (MKP-1) expression, which results in c-Jun N-terminal kinase inactivation.

HTLV-1 HBZ cooperates with JunD to enhance transcription of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (hTERT).

BACKGROUND: Activation of telomerase is a critical and late event in tumor progression. Thus, in patients with adult-T cell leukaemia (ATL), an HTLV-1 (Human T cell Leukaemia virus type 1)-associated disease, leukemic cells display a high telomerase activity, mainly through transcriptional up-regulation of the human telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT). The HBZ (HTLV-1 bZIP) protein coded by the minus strand of HTLV-1 genome and expressed in ATL cells has been shown to increase the transcriptional activity of JunD, an AP-1 protein. The presence of several AP-1 binding sites in the hTERT promoter led us to investigate whether HBZ regulates hTERT gene transcription. RESULTS: Here, we demonstrate using co-transfection assays that HBZ in association with JunD activates the hTERT promoter. Interestingly, the -378/+1 proximal region, which does not contain any AP-1 site was found to be responsible for this activation. Furthermore, an increase of hTERT transcripts was observed in cells co-expressing HBZ and JunD. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays revealed that HBZ, and JunD coexist in the same DNA-protein complex at the proximal region of hTERT promoter. Finally, we provide evidence that HBZ/JunD heterodimers interact with Sp1 transcription factors and that activation of hTERT transcription by these heterodimers is mediated through GC-rich binding sites for Sp1 present in the proximal sequences of the hTERT promoter. CONCLUSION: These observations establish for the first time that HBZ by intervening in the re-activation of telomerase, may contribute to the development and maintenance of the leukemic process.

JunD attenuates phenylephrine-mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by negatively regulating AP-1 transcriptional activity.

OBJECTIVE: Mice deficient for the AP-1 transcription factor JunD, the only Jun protein constitutively expressed and clearly detectable in the mammalian heart, develop enhanced cardiac hypertrophy in response to chronic pressure overload. Catecholamines inducing alpha-adrenergic receptor-mediated signaling have been implicated in the neurohumoral response to pressure overload and the development of left ventricular hypertrophy. In the present study we analyzed the mechanistic role of JunD in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vitro in response to alpha-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine (PE). METHODS: Cardiomyocytes were isolated from 1- to 3-day-old rats and transfected with adenoviruses expressing LacZ or wild-type JunD, or with expression vectors encoding LacZ, wild-type JunD, mutated JunD forming only JunD homodimers (JunDeb1), mutated JunD lacking the JNK site (JunD-Delta 162), or c-Jun. After stimulation with PE (10(-5) mol/L), hypertrophic growth of cardiomyocytes (cross-sectional area and [3H]-leucine incorporation) and mRNA expression of JunD, c-Jun, c-Fos, and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) were analyzed. Transcriptional activation was determined by luciferase activity in cardiomyocytes transfected with AP-1 or ANP luciferase reporter plasmids. Gel shift assays with an AP-1 consensus oligonucleotide were performed to analyze AP-1 DNA binding activities. RESULTS: PE augmented mRNA levels of c-Jun and c-Fos, but decreased JunD transcript levels. Adenoviral over-expression of wild-type JunD blunted PE-induced hypertrophic growth and expression of ANP mRNA. Over-expression of JunD in cardiomyocytes caused enhanced AP-1 protein-DNA binding, without increasing the transcriptional response from AP-1 or ANP luciferase reporter plasmids at baseline or upon PE stimulation. Moreover, over-expression of JunDeb1 attenuated transcription from AP-1 or ANP luciferase reporter plasmids and blunted c-Jun-mediated acceleration of AP-1 transcriptional activity at baseline and in response to PE. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations establish a novel role for JunD as a negative regulator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in response to hypertrophic stimuli by inhibiting AP-1 transcriptional activity.

v-Jun downregulates the alpha 2 (I) collagen target gene indirectly through Sp1/3.

Transformation of chick embryo fibroblasts (CEFs) by the v-Jun oncoprotein correlates with a downregulation of the alpha 2 (I) collagen gene. To investigate whether this gene constitutes a direct target of v-Jun, an analysis of a large proximal fragment of the promoter, extending from position -1080 to +109, was performed. Transient transfections with -1080/+109 and deleted derivatives revealed that a short proximal fragment, -433/+11, is the target for repression by v-Jun. Extensive analysis, conducted in CEFs and in Sp1/3-deficient Drosophila SL2 cells, further showed that (i) high constitutive activity of -433/+11 requires a direct binding of the ubiquitous Sp1 and/or Sp3 transcription factors acting on two distinct motifs, that is, a proximal TCC-rich region and an upstream GC box, and that (ii) repression by v-Jun does not require any direct binding of the oncoprotein to the DNA, but an indirect binding within a v-Jun-Sp1/3-DNA chromatin-associated complex. This situation is reminiscent of a situation previously reported with the tata-less, SPARC (secreted protein, acidic, and rich in cysteine) target promoter that regulates the expression of another extracellular matrix component in the same model of cell transformation. Taken together, these data reinforce the view that, at least in CEFs, v-Jun downregulates a family of direct target genes by binding to the DNA indirectly through Sp1/3.

v-Jun downregulates the SPARC target gene by binding to the proximal promoter indirectly through Sp1/3.

Transformation of chick embryo fibroblasts by the v-Jun oncoprotein correlates with a downregulation of the extracellular matrix protein SPARC and repression of the corresponding mRNA. Repression of SPARC contributes to the oncogenic process by facilitating tumor development in vivo. A proximal promoter fragment, designated -124/+16, is responsible for high constitutive activity of the SPARC gene and is the target of repression by v-Jun. In this paper, using electrophoretic mobility shift and pull-down assays in vitro, and transient transfections and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays in Sp1/3-deficient Drosophila SL2 cells and in chick embryo fibroblasts, we show that (i) Sp1 and/or Sp3 is required for constitutive activation of SPARC transcription, by binding directly to the GGA-rich -92/-57 fragment; and (ii) v-Jun does not bind -124/+16 directly, but binds to the GGA-rich fragment indirectly, most likely through a physical interaction with Sp1/3. Moreover, a transactivation-proficient v-Jun derivative, designated v-Jun/cebp/glz, which cannot bind Jun DNA motifs anymore and cannot heterodimerize, is still capable of downregulating SPARC efficiently. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that v-Jun downregulates SPARC through the formation of a DNA-Sp1/3-v-Jun, chromatin-associated complex.

Transcriptional upregulation of SPARC, in response to c-Jun overexpression, contributes to increased motility and invasion of MCF7 breast cancer cells.

Overexpression of the c-Jun proto-oncogene in MCF7 breast cancer cells results in a variety of phenotype changes related to malignant progression including increased motility and invasion. Concurrent with these phenotypic effects are changes in the expression of multiple gene targets. We previously demonstrated that expression of the SPARC/osteonectin gene, while undetectable in the MCF7 cell line, is highly induced in response to stable c-Jun overexpression (c-Jun/MCF7). Because the SPARC gene product is associated with tumor cell invasion in a variety of different cancers, we have examined its role in mediating the phenotypic changes induced by c-Jun in MCF7 cells. We found that antisense mediated suppression of SPARC dramatically inhibits both motility and invasion in this c-Jun/MCF7 model. In contrast, stable overexpression of SPARC in the parental MCF7 cell line is not sufficient to stimulate cell motility or invasion. Examination of the promoter region of the human SPARC gene reveals three non-canonical AP-1 sites. We demonstrate that one of these sites binds c-Jun/Fra1 heterodimers in vitro, but that this and the other AP-1 like sites are dispensable with respect to c-Jun stimulated SPARC promoter activation. Deletion analysis identified a region between -120 and -70 as a c-Jun responsive element sufficient to induce maximal promoter activation. This region does not contain any AP-1 sites but does mediate binding by SP1 'like' complexes. Furthermore, this region is necessary for SP1/SP3 responsiveness in Drosophila SL2 cells. These results demonstrate that SPARC plays an important role in stimulating motility and the invasive behavior of c-Jun/MCF7 cells and that SPARC promoter activation by c-Jun appears to occur through an indirect mechanism.