Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
S. Afr. j. surg. (Online) ; 56(4): 33-39, 2018. ilus
Article in English | AIM (Africa) | ID: biblio-1271037

ABSTRACT

Background: We present our experience after the introduction of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)©, Trauma Team (TT) and Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing (PPP) protocols for the treatment of hemodynamically unstable pelvic blunt trauma.Methods: This is a retrospective study with historical controls: before (Control Group, CG) and after (Study Group SG) the introduction of the protocol. A single physician managed the CG and angiography was the emergency manoeuvre. A team with ATLS guidelines and PPP as an emergency manoeuvre managed the SG. Data were collected retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: before and after the introduction of protocols.Results: From January 2007 to October 2014, 36 patients were treated at our Centre. We consider patients from January 2007 to August 2011 (19 patients, CG) and from September 2011 to October 2014 (17 patients, SG). Median age was 54 years (43­69) in the CG vs. 47 (40­63) in the SG (p = 0.43), median initial SBP 90 mmHg (85­103) in the CG 94 (69­103) in the SG, (p = 0.60), heart rate was 90 (80­110) in the CG and 110 (95­130) in the SG, (p = 0.09). Median Injury Severity Score was 33 (21­41) in the CG and 34 (26­41) in the SG (p = 0.29). Time from arrival in the Emergency Department to first therapeutic manoeuvre was 132 minutes (109­180) in the CG and 87 minutes (51­204) in the SG (p = 0.4). The difference in mortality was statistically significant: 64.7% (11/17) in the CG and 23.5% (4/17) in the SG (p = 0.02).Conclusions: The introduction of protocols changed our approach in hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma, achieving a remarkable improvement in early mortality


Subject(s)
Advanced Trauma Life Support Care , Angiography , Patients , Pelvis
2.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 39(3): 337-346, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28263031

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The enumeration and differentiation of nuclear elements in synovial fluid is a cornerstone for diagnosis and follow-up of many orthopedic and rheumatologic diseases. In this study, we evaluated the analytical performance of Mindray BC-6800 BF mode (BC-6800-BF) for synovial fluid analysis. METHODS: Overall, 78 synovial fluids were collected and analyzed with both BC-6800-BF and light microscopy. The study also entailed the assessment of limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), limit of quantification (LoQ), carryover and linearity. RESULTS: The LoB for the parameters total cells and white blood cells was 6 × 106 cells/L, and the LoD and LoQ were instead 15 and 16 × 106 cells/L, respectively. Linearity was excellent and carryover was negligible. The agreement between BC-6800-BF and light microscopy was satisfactory for all samples pretreated with hyaluronidase, displaying a bias between -5.9% and 8.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BC-6800-BF for synovial fluid analysis enables rapid and accurate assessment, especially for total cell and polymorphonuclear counts. The use of BC-6800-BF may therefore allow the replacement of optical analysis, especially in samples pretreated with hyaluronidase, thus allowing its routine use for the screening of synovial specimens.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry/instrumentation , Flow Cytometry/methods , Rheumatic Diseases/metabolism , Synovial Fluid/metabolism , Female , Humans , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/chemistry , Leukocytes/metabolism , Leukocytes/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Rheumatic Diseases/pathology
3.
Int Orthop ; 29(5): 305-8, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16082541

ABSTRACT

We performed a prospective study to assess safety and effectiveness of a pre-formed articulating spacer made of gentamicin-impregnated acrylic cement in the management of infected total knee arthroplasty. Twenty-one consecutive patients with unilateral deep infection were treated by two-stage revision in two centres. Two patients were excluded, and 19 patients remained available for assessment. The mean implantation time of the spacer was 12 weeks. The rehabilitation programme between stages consisted in early range of motion exercises and partial weight bearing. Mean follow-up after removal of the spacer and insertion of the final prosthesis was 24 (range, 12-43) months. No patient had recurrence of infection at the latest follow-up. The mean Knee Society functional score during spacer management was rated 75 points and was rated 84 points at the latest follow-up. No device-related complication was observed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Bone Cements , Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Knee Prosthesis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...