Factor VIII Activity and Inhibitor Assays in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemophilia A.

The treatment of a patient with a factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency can be complicated. The mainstay of therapy is factor replacement. Replacement therapy can be given prophylactically, with the goal of decreasing hemarthroses and spontaneous hemorrhage, or on-demand for the bleeding patient. Intra- and interindividual variability in a patient's response to treatment has been well documented by the differences in observed half-lives of infused product. Although weight-based dosing nomograms are most often used, personalized therapies are coming into use to ease the burden of therapy and cost. The most significant complication of treatment is the formation of inhibitors to FVIII. The role of the laboratory is to provide results for FVIII activity that accurately reflects a patient's baseline level and response to treatment. However, factor activity assays have many components that can contribute to result variability. These include the methodology and reagent components used to measure the FVIII activity, the reference standard employed, algorithm used to interpret the dilutions, and the replacement factor being measured. An understanding of assay variables and their impact will assist in providing accurate factor activity results and appropriate patient care.

Reference range determination for whole-blood platelet aggregation using the Multiplate analyzer.

OBJECTIVES: To develop reference ranges for platelet aggregation using the Multiplate analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in blood anticoagulated with sodium citrate (Na-citrate), lithium heparin (Li-heparin), or hirudin. METHODS: The study was performed at three sites on consented, healthy adults (n = 193) not taking antiplatelet medication. Platelet aggregation was evaluated in response to adenosine-5'-diphosphate, arachidonic acid, collagen, thrombin receptor activating peptide, ristocetin, and adenosine-5'-diphosphate combined with prostaglandin E1. Precision testing was conducted using healthy donors and donors taking aspirin. RESULTS: Whole-blood platelet aggregation showed anticoagulant-dependent differences in platelet responses to all agonists. Samples collected in Na-citrate demonstrated the lowest responses to all agonists. The highest responses were obtained using Li-heparin. Precision testing revealed high variability in platelet aggregation at lower agonist doses, regardless of anticoagulant. Highest platelet response variations occurred in response to arachidonic acid in blood anticoagulated with hirudin from participants taking aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the importance of establishing locally relevant reference ranges.

Von Willebrand factor assay proficiency testing. The North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association experience.

We evaluated the accuracy and precision of von Willebrand disease (vWD) testing performed by up to 50 North American Specialty Coagulation Laboratories from 2004 through 2009, using proficiency samples from healthy subjects (n = 7) and patients with type 1 vWD (n = 7) or type 2 vWD (n = 3). We analyzed 2,212 submitted results. Precision was highest for von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen assays (coefficient of variation, 14%), which were performed predominantly by latex immunoassays, and lowest for ristocetin cofactor assays (coefficient of variation, 28%), which were increasingly replaced by collagen binding and immunofunctional methods during the 6-year evaluation period. Overall interpretation error rates ranged from 3% for normal samples, 28% for type 1 vWD, and 60% for type 2 vWD. Type 2 vWD samples were correctly identified by all laboratories using collagen binding/antigen ratios but by only one third of laboratories using ristocetin cofactor/antigen or immunofunctional/antigen ratios. In 2009, only 27% (12/45) of laboratories performed vWF multimer analysis, with error rates ranging from 7% to 22%.

Laboratory monitoring of new anticoagulants.

Maintaining a balance between bleeding and clotting has always been a challenge in treating coagulation disorders. A perturbation in that balance can be associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. As a result, anticoagulant monitoring is extremely important, and inappropriate testing may lead to complications. There are now a variety of new anticoagulant drugs in clinical use including several direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), such as argatroban, bivalirudin, and hirudin, as well as a Factor Xa inhibitor, fondaparinux. There are pitfalls associated with some of the currently used laboratory monitoring tests, and newer alternative laboratory monitoring tests have been investigated (Walenga and Hoppensteadt, Semin Thromb Hemost 2004;30:683-695). In addition, laboratory testing can assist with transitioning patients from DTI to warfarin therapy.

Laboratory assessment of factor VIII inhibitor titer: the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association experience.

Quantification of inhibitory antibodies against infused factor VIII (FVIII) has an important role in the management of patients with hemophilia A. This article summarizes results from the largest North American FVIII inhibitor proficiency testing challenge conducted to date. Test samples, 4 negative and 4 positive (1-3 Bethesda units [BU]/mL), were distributed by the ECAT Foundation in conjunction with the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association and analyzed by 38 to 42 laboratories in 2006 and 2007. Whereas laboratories were able to distinguish between the absence and presence of low-titer FVIII inhibitors, the intralaboratory coefficient of variation was high (30%-42%) for inhibitor-positive samples, and the definition of lower detection limits of the assay was variable (0-1 BU/mL). Most laboratories performed the Bethesda assay with commercially supplied buffered normal pooled plasma in a 1:1 mix with patient plasma. These data provide information for the development of consensus guidelines to improve FVIII inhibitor quantification.