Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 84(12): 2438-43, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26462793

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare tumor volume reduction rate (TVRR) measured by MR volumetry after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and pathological tumor regression grade (TRG) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 20 patients with LARC (cT3-T4) treated with CRT followed by Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) between April 2011 and April 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. Pre- and post- CRT tumor volumes (MR volumetry) were measured on 3D MR sequences. TVRR was determined using the equation TVRR (%)=(pre-CRT tumor volume-post-CRT tumor volume)×100/pre-CRT tumor volume. The downstaging (defined as ypT0-T2) of tumor mass was evaluated and the correlation between TVRR and TRG was calculated with the method proposed by Dworak using the Spearman rank test. RESULTS: The median TVRR was 77.3% (range, 26.4-99.3%); TVRR was >60% in 18 cases (90%) and in 8 of these patients (44.4 %) it was >80%. Downstaging of tumor lesions was obtained in 15 patients (75%). In 4 cases there was a complete tumor regression (TRG4) at histological examination and in the same patients there was also a TVRR>80% measured by MR volumetry. A statistically significant correlation between TVRR and TRG (r(s)=0.5466, p=0.0126) was observed. CONCLUSION: TVRR after preoperative CRT correlates with TRG in LARC. The MR volumetry is a prognostic factor to estimate the tumor response after preoperative CRT. TVRR data may be an useful biomarker for tailoring surgery and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden
3.
Radiat Oncol ; 7: 29, 2012 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22390136

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively reviewed magnetic resonance (MR) images of 96 patients with diagnosis of rectal cancer to evaluate tumour stage (T stage), involvement of mesorectal fascia (MRF), and nodal metastasis (N stage).Our gold standard was histopathology. METHODS: All studies were performed with 1.5-T MR system (Symphony; Siemens Medical System, Erlangen, Germany) by using a phased-array coil. Our population was subdivided into two groups: the first one, formed by patients at T1-T2-T3, N0, M0 stage, whose underwent MR before surgery; the second group included patients at Tx N1 M0 and T3-T4 Nx M0 stage, whose underwent preoperative MR before neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and again 4-6 wks after the end of the treatment for the re-staging of disease.Our gold standard was histopathology. RESULTS: MR showed 81% overall agreement with histological findings for T and N stage prediction; for T stage, this rate increased up to 95% for pts of group I (48/96), while for group II (48/96) it decreased to 75%.Preoperative MR prediction of histologically involved MRF resulted very accurate (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) also after chemoradiation (sensitivity 100%; specificity 67%). CONCLUSIONS: Phased-array MRI was able to clearly estimate the entire mesorectal fat and surrounding pelvic structures resulting the ideal technique for local preoperative rectal cancer staging.


Subject(s)
Fascia/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasm Staging , Preoperative Care , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...