Comparative diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of right-to-left shunt is crucial in the work-up of patients with suspected patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD). While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) remains the gold standard diagnostic tool for the anatomic assessment of PFO/ASD, transcranial Doppler (TCD) and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiogram (CE-TTE) hold the promise of providing minimally invasive yet accurate clinical details. Their comparative accuracy remains however debated. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study leveraging our extensive institutional experience with systematic TCD and CE-TTE in patients with suspected PFO/ASD. Several measures of diagnostic test accuracy were computed, with point estimates and 95% confidence intervals, when applicable. RESULTS: A total of 1358 patients were included, with age 48±14 years and 772 (58%) women. Tests were performed for diagnostic purposes in 797 (58.6%) and during follow-up in 740 (54.5%). A PFO was eventually diagnosed in 1038 (77.9%) patients, and an ASD in 60 (4.5%). Agreement between TCD and CE-TTE occurred in 1309 (85.2%) cases, with TCD yielding worse findings than CE-TTE in 91 (5.9%) patients, and vice versa in 137 (8.9%), yielding a Cohen kappa of 78.6% (95% CI: 76.3-81.1%) and a highly significant P value at McNemar test (P<0.001). After dichotomization, and using TCD as benchmark, CE-TTE yielded sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 95.1%, area under the curve 92.1%, and P=0.249. Similar findings were obtained when focusing only on diagnostic tests or follow-up ones (Cohen kappa respectively 74.0% [70.2-77.1%], P<0.001 and 80.3% [76.4-84.3%], P<0.001). Notably, Valsalva was necessary to disclose the presence of shunt during TCD in 487 (31.7%) patients and during CE-TTE in 482 (31.4%) cases. Finally, performance of TCD and CE-TTE in a subset of patients eventually undergoing TTE was quite similar. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of CE-TTE appears favorable, and this imaging test may identify patients who may be missed if only TCD is used to screen patients with suspected PFO/ASD. Accordingly, CE-TTE is recommended as an adjunct diagnostic modality for all patients with a high pre-test probability of PFO/ASD and right-to-left shunt.

Management of a patient with multiple device replacements and extractions: When the leadless pacemaker is a viable solution.

Leadless pacemaker (LPs) is a safe device and the implantation rates of this device is increasing. The device extraction and replacement are today a challenging procedures especially in case of infections, fragile and older patients or in unfavorable venous anatomy; LPs can be a valid alternative strategy in these cases. We report a case of management of a patient with multiple previous device replacements and extractions, with malfunction of transvenous pacemaker and with a fibrous membrane between the walls of the ventricular lead and the superior vena cava (SVC), who underwent a successful LP implantation.