Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Salud Publica Mex ; 64(5, sept-oct): 530-538, 2022 Aug 26.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36130340

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Proporcionar recomendaciones para la detección temprana de pacientes con alto riesgo de desarrollar cáncer de pulmón (CP) en el primer nivel de atención y su referencia oportuna. Material y métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda detallada de la evidencia científica disponible para responder las preguntas de investigación clínica y se utilizó el Panel Delphi modificado para lograr un consenso entre expertos. RESULTADOS: Se generaron 14 recomendaciones siguiendo los estándares de una GPC. Conclusión. El CP representa un problema de salud pública en México; por ello, esta guía establece recomendaciones que apoyan la toma de decisiones sobre la detección precoz y la referencia de pacientes con sospecha de CP en el primer nivel de atención.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Mexico , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies
2.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 30(6): 462-468, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34115693

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Exposure to biomass combustion products, particularly firewood, has been considered as a potential carcinogen for developing lung cancer. In this regard, current evidence is widely heterogeneous; besides, in most studies, wood smoke exposure is not appropriately quantified, which further complicates the analysis of wood smoke as a potential carcinogen. The aim of the present study was to estimate the risk of developing lung cancer according to the degree of exposure to wood smoke in patients who use firewood for cooking. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a case-control study that included 482 patients with lung cancer (cases) and 592 hospital controls. Exposure to wood smoke was evaluated as a dichotomous variable (i.e. yes or no); in patients with prior wood smoke exposure, an index of exposure in hours per year was calculated (WSEI). Using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, the odds ratio (OR) between wood smoke exposure and lung cancer were calculated. RESULTS: The ORs for developing lung cancer (raw and adjusted) for a WSEI > 100 h/year were OR 1.55 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-2.26) and OR 2.26 (95% CI, 1.50-3.40), respectively; the ORs (raw and adjusted) for WSEI >300 h/year were OR 1.76 (95% CI, 1.06-2.91) and OR 3.19 (95% CI, 1.83-5.55), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to wood smoke is a risk factor for lung cancer; furthermore, this effect maintains a dose-response relationship which has a multiplicative effect with smoking.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Smoke , Carcinogens , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Smoke/adverse effects , Wood/adverse effects
3.
Int J Med Sci ; 15(9): 883-891, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30008600

ABSTRACT

Background: Diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains a challenge, especially when resources in pathology are limited. The study aimed to evaluate cost-effective tumor markers to predict the probability of MPM in plasma samples in order to accelerate the diagnostic workup of the tissue of potential cases. Methods: We conducted a case-control study stratified by gender, which included 75 incident cases with MPM from three Mexican hospitals and 240 controls frequency-matched by age and year of blood drawing. Plasma samples were obtained to determine mesothelin, calretinin, and thrombomodulin using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). We estimated the performance of the markers based on the area under the curve (AUC) and predicted the probability of an MPM diagnosis of a potential case based on the marker concentrations. Results: Mesothelin and calretinin, but not thrombomodulin were significant predictors of a diagnosis of MPM with AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94), and 0.51 (95% CI: 0.41-0.61) in males, respectively. For MPM diagnosis in men we estimated a true positive rate of 0.79 and a false positive rate of 0.11 for mesothelin. The corresponding figures for calretinin were 0.81 and 0.18, and for both markers combined 0.84 and 0.11, respectively. Conclusions: We developed prediction models based on plasma concentrations of mesothelin and calretinin to estimate the probability of an MPM diagnosis. Both markers showed a good performance and could be used to accelerate the diagnostic workup of tissue samples in Mexico.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Calbindin 2/blood , GPI-Linked Proteins/blood , Mesothelioma/diagnosis , Pleural Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms , Male , Mesothelin , Mesothelioma/blood , Mexico , Middle Aged , Pleural Neoplasms/blood
4.
J. bras. pneumol ; 43(6): 424-430, Nov.-Dec. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-893883

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated that closed pleural biopsy (CPB) has a sensitivity of less than 60% for diagnosing malignancy. Therefore, controversy has recently emerged regarding the value of CPB as a diagnostic test. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CPB in diagnosing malignancy in patients with pleural effusion. Methods: This was a prospective 8-year study of individuals who underwent CPB to establish the etiology of pleural effusion. Information on each patient was obtained from anatomopathological reports and medical records. When CPB findings showed malignancy or tuberculosis, the biopsy was considered diagnostic, and that was the definitive diagnosis. In cases in which biopsy histopathological findings were nonspecific, a definitive diagnosis was established on the basis of other diagnostic procedures, such as thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, biochemical and cellular measurements in pleural fluid, and/or microbiological tests. The accuracy of CPB was determined with 2 × 2 contingency tables. Results: A total of 1034 biopsies from patients with pleural effusion were studied. Of those, 171 (16.54%) were excluded from the accuracy analysis either because of inadequate samples or insufficient information. The results of the accuracy analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 99%; negative predictive value, 66%; positive likelihood ratio, 38.5; negative likelihood ratio, 0.23; pre-test probability, 2.13; and post-test probability, 82. Conclusions: CPB is useful in clinical practice as a diagnostic test, because there is an important change from pre-test to post-test probability.


RESUMEN Objetivo: Estudios previos demuestran que la biopsia pleural cerrada (BPC) para diagnóstico de malignidad tiene una sensibilidad menor al 60%, por lo que recientemente ha despertado controversia su valor como prueba diagnóstica. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la exactitud de la BPC para diagnóstico de malignidad en pacientes con derrame pleural. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de 8 años en individuos que se sometieron a la realización de BPC para establecer la etiología del derrame. La información de cada paciente se tomó de los registros de anatomopatología y del expediente clínico. Cuando el resultado de la BPC demostró malignidad o tuberculosis, esto se tomó como biopsia diagnóstica y quedó éste como diagnóstico definitivo. En los casos en que el resultado del estudio histopatológico de la biopsia resultó inespecífico, el diagnóstico definitivo se estableció en base a otros procedimientos diagnósticos, como toracoscopia, toracotomía, fibrobroncoscopia, estudio bioquímico y celular del líquido pleural y/o pruebas microbiológicas. Mediante una tabla de contingencia de 2 × 2 se midieron los indicadores para una prueba diagnóstica. Resultados: Se estudiaron 1034 biopsias de pacientes con derrame pleural, de las cuales se excluyeron 171 (16.54%) por muestra inadecuada o información insuficiente. El desempeño para malignidad fue: sensibilidad, 77%; especificidad, 98%; valores predictivos positivo y negativo, 99% y 66%, respectivamente; índices de probabilidad positivo y negativo, 38.5 y 0.23, respectivamente; probabilidad antes y después de la prueba, 2.13 y 82, respectivamente. Conclusión: La BPC es útil como prueba diagnóstica en la práctica clínica, debido a que produce un cambio importante de la probabilidad antes de la prueba a la probabilidad después de la prueba.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Biopsy/classification , Biopsy/methods , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/pathology , Pleura/pathology , Thoracoscopy , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
J Bras Pneumol ; 43(6): 424-430, 2017.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29340490

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have demonstrated that closed pleural biopsy (CPB) has a sensitivity of less than 60% for diagnosing malignancy. Therefore, controversy has recently emerged regarding the value of CPB as a diagnostic test. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CPB in diagnosing malignancy in patients with pleural effusion. METHODS: This was a prospective 8-year study of individuals who underwent CPB to establish the etiology of pleural effusion. Information on each patient was obtained from anatomopathological reports and medical records. When CPB findings showed malignancy or tuberculosis, the biopsy was considered diagnostic, and that was the definitive diagnosis. In cases in which biopsy histopathological findings were nonspecific, a definitive diagnosis was established on the basis of other diagnostic procedures, such as thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, biochemical and cellular measurements in pleural fluid, and/or microbiological tests. The accuracy of CPB was determined with 2 × 2 contingency tables. RESULTS: A total of 1034 biopsies from patients with pleural effusion were studied. Of those, 171 (16.54%) were excluded from the accuracy analysis either because of inadequate samples or insufficient information. The results of the accuracy analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 99%; negative predictive value, 66%; positive likelihood ratio, 38.5; negative likelihood ratio, 0.23; pre-test probability, 2.13; and post-test probability, 82. CONCLUSIONS: CPB is useful in clinical practice as a diagnostic test, because there is an important change from pre-test to post-test probability.


Subject(s)
Biopsy , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/pathology , Biopsy/classification , Biopsy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pleura/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thoracoscopy
6.
Rev. Fac. Med. UNAM ; 59(6): 43-57, nov.-dic. 2016. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-957116

ABSTRACT

Resumen La exploración adecuada del tórax tiene una secuencia que ayuda al clínico a seguir varios pasos e integrar sus hallazgos en síndromes, mismos que lo llevarán con más seguridad hacia el diagnóstico más adecuado. Al cumplirse los 200 años de la invención del estetoscopio por René Laënec, tomamos esta oportunidad para recordarlo y detallar los pasos de la exploración del tórax. El hecho de contar con más herramientas tecnológicas para el diagnóstico, no le resta importancia a esta etapa tan importante de la relación entre el médico y su paciente, que es la exploración.


Abstract Thoracic exploration has a sequence of steps that help the clinician to integrate its findings in syndromes, which will lead the physician to better diagnosis. This year the stethoscope, invented by René Laënec, turns 200 years old and we use this opportunity to remember him and provide a detailed description of the thoracic exploration. To have access to more sophisticated diagnostic tools should not diminish the relevance of a direct exploration of the patient, which is a very important step in the patient-physician relationship.

7.
Rev Invest Clin ; 65 Suppl 1: S5-84, 2013 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24459776

ABSTRACT

Mexican specialists in oncology, oncologic surgery, thoracic surgery, pneumology, pathology, molecular biology, anesthesiology, algology, psychology, nutrition, and rehabilitation (all of them experts in lung cancer treatment) in order to develop the National Consensus on Lung Cancer. The consensus has been developed as an answer to the need of updated Mexican guidelines for the optimal treatment of the disease, as well as to the requirements that such guidelines be established by multidisciplinary panel, depicting the current attention given to cancer lung cases in Mexico. Thus, this paper analyses the epidemiological review, screening, diagnosis, staging, pathology, translational medicine, and the suitable therapies for early, locally advanced, and metastatic disease in the first, second, and third lines of management, as well as rehabilitation and palliative measures.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Algorithms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/complications , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/etiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/secondary , Decision Trees , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Mexico , Neoplasm Staging , Smoking/adverse effects
8.
J Thorac Oncol ; 3(8): 887-93, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18670307

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Erlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has improved survival and quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after first- or second-line chemotherapy. Asian origin, adenocarcinoma histology, female gender, lack of tobacco use, and expression of epidermal growth factor receptor are significant independent predictors of response to Erlotinib. Although tobacco use is considered a major cause of NSCLC, other risk factors such as wood-smoke exposure (WSE) are associated. Almost 3 billion people worldwide rely on solid fuels as their primary source of domestic energy for cooking and heating. METHODS: In this study, 150 consecutive unselected patients with histologically proven NSCLC with progression after prior first- or second-line chemotherapy and/or poor performance status were treated with Erlotinib 150 mg/d. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were associated with response. RESULTS: Overall response to Erlotinib was observed in 51 patients [34%; 95% confidence interval {95% CI}, 29.9-37.6]. In multivariate analysis, clinical features associated with response to Erlotinib were adenocarcinoma (35 versus 20%; p = 0.05) and WSE (83 versus 13%; p < 0.001). Factors associated with longer progression-free survival in Cox analysis included adenocarcinoma (7.9 versus 2.3 months; p = 0.009), female gender (8.4 versus 5.3 months; p = 0.04), and WSE (17.6 versus 5.3 months; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: WSE is associated with better response to Erlotinib and improved progression-free survival in patients with NSCLC. Additional studies in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in WSE-associated NSCLC are warranted.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Quinazolines/therapeutic use , Smoke , Wood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/etiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Erlotinib Hydrochloride , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...