Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Eat Weight Disord ; 15(1-2 Suppl): 1-31, 2010.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20975326

ABSTRACT

This paper is an Italian Expert Consensus Document on multidimensional treatment of obesity and eating disorders. The Document is based on a wide survey of expert opinion. It presents, in particular, considerations regarding how clinicians go about choosing the most appropriate site of treatment for a given patient suffering from obesity and/or eating disorders: outpatient, partial hospitalization, residential rehabilitation centre, inpatient hospitalization. In a majority of instances obesity and eating disorders are long-term diseases and require a multiprofessional team-approach. In determining an initial level of care or a change to a different level of care, it is essential to consider together the overall physical condition, medical complications, disabilities, psychiatric comorbidity, psychology, behaviour, family, social resources, environment, and available services. We first created a review manuscript, a skeleton algorithm and two rating scales, based on the published guidelines and the existing research literature. As the second point we highlighted a number of clinical questions that had to be addressed in the specific context of our National Health Service and available specialized care units. Then we submitted eleven progressive revisions of the Document to the experts up to the final synthesis that was approved by the group. Of course, from point to point, some of the individual experts would differ with the consensus view. The document can be viewed as an expert consultation and the clinical judgement must always be tailored to the particular needs of each clinical situation. We will continue to revise the Document periodically based on new research information and on reassessment of expert opinion to keep it up-to-date. The Document was not financially sponsored.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Expert Testimony , Feeding and Eating Disorders/diagnosis , Feeding and Eating Disorders/therapy , Hospitalization , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/therapy , Patient Care Team , Residential Treatment , Algorithms , Ambulatory Care/standards , Anorexia Nervosa/diagnosis , Anorexia Nervosa/therapy , Binge-Eating Disorder/diagnosis , Binge-Eating Disorder/therapy , Bulimia Nervosa/diagnosis , Bulimia Nervosa/therapy , Comorbidity , Consensus , Day Care, Medical , Disability Evaluation , Feeding and Eating Disorders/physiopathology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/rehabilitation , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Italy , Motor Activity , National Health Programs , Nutritional Status , Obesity/physiopathology , Obesity/psychology , Obesity/rehabilitation , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Residential Treatment/standards , Risk Factors , Social Environment , Walking
2.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol ; 16(1): 27-32, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11195257

ABSTRACT

A 6-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial was carried out to examine the efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide, a monoamine oxidase type A selective and reversible inhibitor, in the treatment of bulimia nervosa. Patients were admitted to the study even if they were unable to adhere to a tyramine-free diet. Fifty-two normal-weight women (age range 18-40 years) suffering from bulimia nervosa (DSM-IV criteria) completed the trial. Particular emphasis was placed on evaluating the incidence of hypertension and other side-effects in chronically treated patients. At the usual antidepressant dose of 600 mg, moclobemide was not significantly superior to placebo in the reducing the weekly number of binge eating episodes or in improving several measures of eating attitudes and behaviour (BITE, EDI, TFEQ) in normal-weight bulimia nervosa. The dropout rate was relatively low (29%), and the side-effects were limited and equally distributed between the two treatment groups. No patient experienced a hypertensive crisis during the study and no serious side-effect was detected. The study indicates that moclobemide 600 mg pro die is not efficacious in bulimia nervosa, but it can be safely administered, even to young subjects, at a very high risk of consuming large amounts of tyramine-rich foods without dietary restrictions.


Subject(s)
Bulimia/drug therapy , Moclobemide/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Bulimia/diagnosis , Bulimia/psychology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Moclobemide/adverse effects , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...