Sensibilización durante la asistencia circulatoria de corta duración. Determinantes, tratamiento y pronóstico después del trasplante cardiaco / Sensitization during short-term mechanical circulatory support. Determinants, therapeutic management, and outcomes after heart transplant

Introducción y objetivos: El desarrollo de anticuerpos contra antígenos leucocitarios humanos es una complicación conocida de la asistencia ventricular de larga duración. El propósito del presente estudio es evaluar su incidencia durante el empleo de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular de corta duración (DAVC) (CentriMag), sus determinantes y su repercusión en los resultados del trasplante cardiaco. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo con pacientes tratados con DAVC como puente al trasplante entre 2009 y 2019. Se consideró sensibilización un panel reactivo de anticuerpos calculado> 10%. Las variables de respuesta fueron supervivencia y supervivencia libre de rechazo agudo (RA). Resultados: Se trató con DAVC a 89 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 56,0 [intervalo intercuartílico, 50,0-59,9] años y el 16,8% de mujeres, durante una mediana de 23,6 [16,6-35,0] días. El 12,4% se sensibilizó durante la asistencia. El único determinante independiente de la sensibilización fue el sexo femenino (OR=8,67; IC95%, 1,93-38,8; p=0,005). De los 89 pacientes, 21 fallecieron durante la asistencia y 68 se sometieron a trasplante. De los pacientes trasplantados, 8 (11,8%) fallecieron y 20 (29,4%) tuvieron algún episodio de RA tras un seguimiento promedio de 49,6 ±31,2 meses tras el trasplante. Tras ajuste multivariable, la sensibilización aumentó el riesgo de RA (HR=3,64; IC95%, 1,42-9,33; p=0,007), con una tendencia no significativa a mayor mortalidad (HR=4,07; IC95%, 0,96-17,3; p=0,057). Conclusiones: La sensibilización relacionada con los DAVC es posible, predomina en el sexo femenino y se asocia de manera significativa con el RA, con una tendencia no significativa a mayor mortalidad (AU)

Introduction and objectives: The development of human-leukocyte antigen antibodies is a well-known adverse effect of the use of long-term ventricular assist devices (VADs). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of sensitization during short-term mechanical circulatory support with VAD (CentriMag), its determinants, and its impact on posttransplant outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who were bridged to transplant with short-term VAD from 2009 to 2019. Sensitization was defined as a calculated panel-reactive antibody> 10%. The endpoints included overall survival and rejection-free survival. Results: A total of 89 patients (median age 56.0 [interquartile range, 50.0-59.9] years, 16.8% female) received a short-term VAD as a bridge to transplant. The median duration of support was 23.6 [interquartile range, 16.6-35.0] days. Eleven patients (12.4%) became sensitized during support. The only factor significantly associated with sensitization was female sex (OR, 8.67; 95%CI, 1.93–38.8; P=.005). Of the 89 patients, 21 patients died during support; 68 patients underwent heart transplant. After a mean follow-up of 49.6 ±31.2 months, 8 patients (11.8%) died and 20 (29.4%) had at least 1 rejection episode. On multivariate analysis, sensitization was an independent predictor of acute rejection (HR, 3.64; 95%CI, 1.42-9.33; P=.007), with a nonstatistically significant trend to higher mortality (HR, 4.07; 95%CI, 0.96-17.3; P=.057). Conclusions: Sensitization with short-term VADs can occur and is significantly associated with female sex and with rejection. Sensitization also showed a nonstatistically significant trend to higher mortality (AU)

Single-chamber ICD, single-zone therapy in primary and secondary prevention patients: the simpler the better?

BACKGROUND: It is now well established that implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation reduces mortality in patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, the best programming parameters remain controversial. Our traditional policy has followed a simple approach in the vast majority of patients. In accordance with ICD programming in the major randomized clinical trials, we programmed a single high-rate, shock-only therapy zone. We aimed to demonstrate in this observational study that simple programming is not associated with higher shock rates or mortality when compared to other published studies. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent single-chamber ICD implantation with single-zone, high-rate programming at our institution between 1993 and 2008 were retrospectively studied. Data were collected prospectively in a database regarding details of ICD implantation, demographic data, and indication. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-two patients were included in our study, 31 % primary prevention and 68 % secondary prevention. Mean ejection fraction (EF) is 33.7 ± 15.3. Over a mean follow-up period of 62.5 ± 38.1 months, 135 patients experienced ICD shock (annualized event rate 7.7 %); 89 patients (26.8 %) appropriate shock in VT-ventricular fibrillation (VF), 68 patients (20.5 %) inappropriate shocks, and 22 patients (6.6 %) both. Twenty-nine patients (8.7 %) were reprogrammed to additional VT-ATP zones. Twenty-two (6.6 %) patients underwent heart transplantation. Sixty-two patients (18.6 %) died during follow-up, 43.6 % out of them due to cardiac cause, mainly progressive heart failure. CONCLUSION: Our results show that simpler settings with single-zone, high-rate programming is associated with ICD shock rates and long-term mortality that does not appear to be worse when compared with contemporary studies which include multizone ICD programming with antitachycardia pacing activated.