ABSTRACT
Adolescent girls report low physical activity levels and poor body image and self-esteem. This study evaluated the impact of a girls' health intervention on body image, self-esteem, and physical activity enjoyment. The intervention was grounded in self-determination theory, resulting in lessons designed to promote autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The two primary components of the intervention included opportunities for girls to learn about resistance training as well as ways to improve their psychosocial health (i.e., body image, self-esteem, and physical activity enjoyment). Girls (n = 590), in the intervention (Mage = 12.79, SD = 0.69) and control group (Mage = 12.92, SD = 0.73), completed pre and post measures. A repeated measures MANOVA was conducted to assess changes in body image, self-esteem, and physical activity enjoyment. The intervention resulted in a significant increase in body esteem-appearance, F = 9.23, p = 0.003, and body esteem-weight, F = 4.77, p = 0.029, and a greater, non-significant, increase in self-esteem (3.22%), and physical activity enjoyment (4.01%) compared to the control group. This highlighted the use of the intervention for significant improvements in appearance and weight-related body image. The results support implementing psychosocial lessons, as well as physical activity, in health programming for girls.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: El COVID-19 es una enfermedad que desde su aparición en 2019 ha representado un reto para los servicios sanitarios. Las secuelas son consecuencia de un deterioro de la calidad de vida, fatiga, disnea y dolor articular. Objetivo: Comparar parámetros funcionales físicos, respiratorios, cognitivos y de independencia funcional en pacientes post COVID-19, con secuelas respiratorias antes y después de un programa de terapia física y ocupacional respiratoria. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio comparativo, cuasiexperimental, prospectivo en pacientes ambulatorios egresados de hospitalización por COVID-19 en un Hospital de 3er nivel de atención del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social en Puebla, México durante 2020-2021. Se aplicaron escalas antes y después del programa de rehabilitación. Se utilizó estadística analítica. Resultados: Se incluyeron 116 pacientes, 57,7% hombres, edad media de 47,32 años (min. 20, máx. 79); 77 (66,3%) pacientes presentaron síntomas moderados en hospitalización. Se obtuvo un valor de p significativa (p <0,001). Conclusión: Se observa una mejoría significativa en los pacientes post COVID-19 tras recibir terapia física y ocupacional respiratoria.
Introduction. COVID-19 is a disease that since its emergence in 2019 has represented a challenge for healthcare services. The sequelae result from impaired quality of life, fatigue, dyspnea and joint pain. Objective. To compare physical, respiratory, cognitive and functional independence functional parameters in post-COVID-19 patients with respiratory sequelae before and after a respiratory physical and occupational therapy program. Methods. A comparative, quasi-experimental, prospective study was conducted in outpatients discharged from hospitalization for COVID-19 in a 3rd level of care Hospital of the Mexican Institute of Social Security in Puebla, Mexico during 2020-2021. Scales were applied before and after the rehabilitation program. Analytical statistics were used. Results. We included 116 patients, 57.7% men, mean age 47.32 years (min. 20, max. 79); 77 (66.3%) patients presented moderate symptoms in hospitalization. A significant p-value was obtained (p <0.001). Conclusion. Significant improvement is observed in post-COVID-19 patients after receiving respiratory physical and occupational therapy.
ABSTRACT
U.S. Hispanic/Latino adults are at heightened risk for developing diet-related chronic diseases. Healthcare provider recommendations have shown to be effective for promoting health behavior change, but little is known about healthcare provider healthy eating recommendations among Hispanics/Latinos. To investigate the prevalence of and adherence to healthcare provider-delivered healthy eating recommendations among a U.S. sample of Hispanic/Latino adults, participants (N = 798; M = 39.6±15.1 years; 52% Mexican/Mexican American) were recruited via Qualtrics Panels to complete an online survey in January 2018. Most (61%) participants reported having ever received a healthcare provider-delivered dietary recommendation. Higher body mass index (AME = 0.015 [0.009, 0.021]) and having a chronic health condition (AME = 0.484 [0.398, 0.571]) were positively associated with receiving a dietary recommendation while age (AME = -0.004 [-0.007, -0.001]) and English proficiency (AME = -0.086 [-0.154, -0.018]) were negatively associated. Participants reported adhering regularly (49.7%) and sometimes (44.4%) to recommendations. There were no significant associations with patient characteristics and adherence to a healthcare provider-delivered dietary recommendation. Findings inform next steps toward increasing implementation of brief dietary counseling from healthcare providers to support prevention and management of chronic diseases among this under-studied population.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es el tercer cáncer más frecuente y la segunda causa principal de muerte a nivel mundial con una incidencia 10,2%. El tratamiento del CCR ha cambiado durante los últimos 25 años. Se utilizan dos manejos quirúrgicos: la resección abdominoperineal (RAP) y la resección anterior baja (RAB) y la ultra baja (RAUB). La tasa de recidiva y la calidad de vida son similares. Objetivo: Comparar la calidad de vida de los pacientes con cáncer de recto tratados con resección abdominoperineal vs resecciones conservadoras de esfínteres: anterior baja y ultra baja en la UMAE Puebla. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio comparativo, observacional, transversal en pacientes con CCR atendidos durante 2015-2019 en un hospital de 3er nivel en Puebla. Se formaron dos grupos: los manejados con RAP y los manejados con RAB/RAUB. Se aplicó la escala EORT QLQ CR-29 y EuroQol. Se aplicó estadística descriptiva y U de Man-Whitney para comparaciones. Resultados: Se reclutaron 26 pacientes, 18 manejados con RAP y 8 con RAB/RAUB. Se registró una CV media en el grupo RAP de 73,72 (DE 16,92, mínimo 31,46, máximo 95,09) y en el grupo RAB/RAUB de 56,22 (DE 6,29, mínimo 47,51, máximo 68,96), con un valor de p=0,005. Conclusiones: No hay diferencia significativa en la calidad de vida de los pacientes con CCR operados por RAP, RAB y RAUB (abordaje no conservador y conservador).
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of death worldwide, with an incidence of 10.2%. The treatment of CRC has evolved over the past 25 years. Two surgical procedures are used: abdominoperineal resection (APR) and low anterior resection (LAR) and ultra-low anterior resection (ULAR). The recurrence rate and quality of life are similar between these approaches. Objective: To compare the quality of life of rectal cancer patients treated with abdominoperineal resection versus conservative sphincter-preserving surgeries: low anterior resection (LAR) and ultra-low anterior resection (ULAR) at UMAE of Puebla. Methods: A comparative, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted on CRC patients treated between 2015 and 2019 at a tertiary-level hospital in Puebla. Two groups were formed: those managed with APR and those managed with LAR/ULAR. The EORTC QLQ-CR29 scale and EuroQol were applied. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparisons. Results: A total of 26 patients were recruited, 18 with APR and 8 with LAR/ULAR. The mean quality of life score in the APR group was 73.72 (SD 16.92, minimum 31.46, maximum 95.09), and in the LAR/ULAR group was 56.22 (SD 6.29, minimum 47.51, maximum 68.96), with a p-value of 0.005. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the quality of life of CRC patients operated with APR, LAR, and ULAR (non-conservative and conservative approaches).
