Duodenal and Rectal Mucosa Inflammation in Patients With Non-celiac Wheat Sensitivity.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Studies of non-celiac gluten or wheat sensitivity (NCGWS) have increased but there are no biomarkers of this disorder. We aimed to evaluate histologic features of colon and rectal tissues from patients with NCGWS. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 78 patients (66 female; mean age, 36.4 years) diagnosed with NCGWS by double-blind wheat challenge at 2 tertiary care centers in Italy, from January 2015 through September 2016. Data were also collected from 55 patients wither either celiac disease or self-reported NCGWS but negative results from the wheat-challenge test (non-NCGWS controls). Duodenal and rectal biopsies were collected and analyzed by immunohistochemistry to quantify intra-epithelial CD3+ T cells, lamina propria CD45+ cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, mast cells, and eosinophils and to determine the presence and size of lymphoid nodules in patients with NCGWS vs patients with celiac disease or non-NCGWS controls. RESULTS: Duodenal tissues from patients with NCGWS had significantly higher numbers of intra-epithelial CD3+ T cells, lamina propria CD45+ cells, and eosinophils than duodenal tissues from non-NCGWS controls. Duodenal tissues from patients with NCGWS and dyspepsia had a higher number of lamina propria eosinophils than patients with NCGWS without upper digestive tract symptoms. Rectal mucosa from patients with NCGWS had a larger number of enlarged lymphoid follicles, intra-epithelial CD3+ T cells, lamina propria CD45+ cells, and eosinophils than rectal mucosa from non-NCGWS controls. Duodenal and rectal mucosal tissues from patients with celiac disease had more immunocytes (CD45+ cells, CD3+ cells, and eosinophils) than tissues from patients with NCGWS or non-NCGWS controls. CONCLUSIONS: We identified markers of inflammation, including increased numbers of eosinophils, in duodenal and rectal mucosa from patients with NCGWS. NCGWS might therefore involve inflammation of the entire intestinal tract. Eosinophils could serve as a biomarker for NCGWS and be involved in its pathogenesis. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01762579.

Clinical usefulness of gastric-juice analysis in 2007: the stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.

BACKGROUND: Gastric juice is usually discarded during upper-GI endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: By using a novel device, the Mt 21-42, we evaluated the potential of this important organic fluid in clinical practice, exploring its contribution to the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and atrophic gastritis of the oxyntic mucosa (AGOM). DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A multicenter study (17,907 patients; 10 endoscopy units) estimated the frequency of diagnosis of AGOM and H pylori infection in routine endoscopic practice. A prospective study (216 patients) at 1 of these units aimed to determine the real prevalence of these conditions and the possible benefits of gastric juice analysis. We considered gastric juice pH and ammonium concentration, endoscopic and histologic features, serologic parameters for atrophy and H pylori, gastric acid secretion, and costs. RESULTS: We found that H pylori infection and, even more markedly, AGOM were greatly underdiagnosed in routine endoscopic practice (20.1% and 0.8% vs 49.1% and 12.5% in the prospective study, respectively), because of the intrinsic limitations of the conventional tests and lack/inappropriateness of biopsy planning. Gastric-juice analysis proved to be a cheap, simple, and effective way to prevent such underdiagnosis and allowed detection of atrophic gastritis and H pylori in 96% and 98% of cases, and saved costs (cost-effectiveness ratio 209 vs 274-5047). CONCLUSIONS: Gastric juice provided a valuable source of clinicopathologic information that, properly analyzed, allowed detection of the main risk factors for gastric cancer (H pylori and atrophic gastritis), overcoming the diagnostic limitations associated with these conditions and also producing time and cost savings.