Adult Patient Preferences for Long-Acting ADHD Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) requires a multifaceted approach including psychosocial interventions and pharmacological treatment. This study evaluates preferences for specific attributes associated with different long-acting stimulant treatment among US adults with ADHD. METHODS: Patients completed an online, cross-sectional survey, incorporating a discrete choice experiment to assess preferences for attributes. RESULTS: Analyses included 200 adults with ADHD (mean age 33.0 years; 60% self-reporting moderate severity); the mean (SD) Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale-v1.1 score was 45.9 (12.4). Overall, patients valued speed of onset most and risk of rebound least. Three population groups with distinct preferences were identified: side effect-driven (n=69, 35%), quick onset-driven (n=47, 24%) and quick onset and long duration-driven (n=84, 42%). CONCLUSION: This study shows differences in how adults with ADHD value and assess benefit-risk trade-offs when considering the desired attributes of stimulant treatments, highlighting the importance of patient-physician shared decision-making to optimize the desired benefits of individualized treatment.

Randomized Controlled Crossover Trials of the Pharmacokinetics of PRC-063, a Novel Multilayer Extended-Release Formulation of Methylphenidate, in Healthy Adults.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: PRC-063 is a once-daily, extended-release oral formulation of methylphenidate hydrochloride developed to provide early and prolonged symptom improvement in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. METHODS/PROCEDURES: We conducted 3 randomized, open-label crossover studies of the pharmacokinetics of PRC-063 in healthy, nonobese men and women aged 18 to 45 years. PRC-063 (100 mg/d) was compared with immediate-release methylphenidate (20 mg, 3 times daily) when administered on a single day under fasted and fed conditions and at steady state (day 5 of repeat dosing under fasted conditions). The pharmacokinetics of PRC-063 administered as capsule contents sprinkled on apple sauce, yoghurt, or ice cream were also investigated. FINDINGS/RESULTS: PRC-063 demonstrated biphasic absorption, with 2 distinct peak plasma concentrations. Intake of a high-fat, high-calorie meal did not increase the peak plasma methylphenidate concentration (Cmax) or extent of absorption (area under the curve), however; it resulted in slower uptake versus a fasted state. During repeated dosing, steady state was reached with no further accumulation of methylphenidate from day 3. At steady state, PRC-063 gave higher evening and trough plasma methylphenidate levels than immediate-release methylphenidate (3 times daily). The pharmacokinetics of PRC-063 sprinkled on food were comparable to that of intact capsules. Reported adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the established safety profile of methylphenidate. There were no serious AEs, but 3 subjects discontinued the repeat-dosing study because of AEs assessed as possibly related to study treatment. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that PRC-063 can be taken with or without food or by sprinkling capsule contents on food.

Use of immediate-release opioids as supplemental analgesia during management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain with buprenorphine transdermal system.

BACKGROUND: The buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) is approved in the US for the management of chronic pain. Due to its high affinity for µ-opioid receptors with a slow dissociation profile, buprenorphine may potentially displace or prevent the binding of competing µ-opioid-receptor agonists, including immediate-release (IR) opioids, in a dose-dependent manner. Health care professionals may assume that the use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during BTDS therapy is not acceptable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This post hoc analysis evaluated the use of IR opioids as supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate-severe chronic pain with BTDS at 52 US sites (BUP3015S, NCT01125917). Patients were categorized into IR-opioid and no-IR-opioid groups. At each visit of the extension phase, adverse events, concomitant medications, and information from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were recorded. RESULTS: The most common supplemental IR opioids prescribed during BTDS treatment (n=354) were hydrocodone-acetaminophen and oxycodone-acetaminophen. The mean daily dose of IR opioids (morphine equivalents) for supplemental analgesia was 22 mg. At baseline, BPI - pain intensity and BPI - interference scores were higher for patients in the IR-opioid group. In both treatment groups, scores improved by week 4, and then were maintained throughout 6 months of the open-label extension trial. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who were prescribed IR opioids reported lower scores for BPI pain intensity and pain interference to levels similar to patients receiving BTDS without IR opioids, without increasing the rate or severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. Patients prescribed concomitant use of IR opioids with BTDS had greater treatment persistence. The results of this post hoc analysis provide support for the concomitant use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate-severe chronic pain with BTDS.