The effects of figure/ground, perceived area, and target saliency on the luminosity threshold.

Observers adjusted the luminance of a target region until it began to appear self-luminous, or glowing. In Experiment 1, the target was either a face-shaped region (figure) or a non-face-shaped region (ground) of identical area that appeared to be the face's background. In Experiment 2, the target was a square or a trapezoid of identical area that appeared as a tilted rectangle. In Experiment 3, the target was a square surrounded by square, circular, or diamond-shaped elements. Targets that (1) were perceived as figures, (2) were phenomenally small in area, or (3) did not group well with other elements in the array because of shape appeared self-luminous at significantly lower luminance levels. These results indicate that like lightness perception, the luminosity threshold is influenced by perceptual organization and is not based on low-level retinal processes alone.

An anchoring theory of lightness perception.

A review of the field of lightness perception from Helmholtz to the present shows the most adequate theories of lightness perception to be the intrinsic image models. Nevertheless, these models fail on 2 important counts: They contain no anchoring rule, and they fail to account for the pattern of errors in surface lightness. Recent work on both the anchoring problem and the problem of errors has produced a new model of lightness perception, one that is qualitatively different from the intrinsic image models. The new model, which is based on a combination of local and global anchoring of lightness values, appears to provide an unprecedented account of a wide range of empirical results, both classical and recent, especially the pattern of errors. It provides a unified account of both illumination-dependent failures of constancy and background-dependent failures of constancy, resolving a number of long-standing puzzles.

Local and global processes in surface lightness perception.

Various demonstrations show that a target of constant luminance can be made to appear darker in perceived lightness merely by introducing an adjacent region of higher luminance. This has often been interpreted as a manifestation of contrast effects produced by lateral inhibition, a relatively local process. An alternative interpretation holds that the highest luminance in such a display serves as an anchor that defines the white level. This interpretation is global in the sense that the anchor need not be located near any particular target in order to serve as its standard. Edge integration processes have been postulated that would enable such remote comparisons, but there is controversy about the strength of these processes. We report a series of experiments in which local and global processes were assessed. Specifically, we tested whether the introduction of a higher luminance has a greater darkening effect on an adjacent target than on a remote target. We found no difference, suggesting that the darkening effect is a matter of anchoring, not contrast, and that edge integration processes required by anchoring are relatively strong.