Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 21(4): e384-e397, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33339770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) in Hispanics has never been studied. We therefore sought to determine the clinical characteristics and overall survival in MM of Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic whites (NHW) and non-Hispanic blacks (NHB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-center analysis of 939 patients diagnosed with MM from 2000 to 2017 with a large representation of NHB (n = 489), Hispanics (n = 281), and NHW (n = 169) was conducted to evaluate outcomes and disease characteristics. We used the Connect MM Registry, a large US multicenter prospective observational study with newly diagnosed MM patients, as a validation cohort. RESULTS: Hispanics had a higher incidence of MM compared to NHW. The median age at presentation was 5 years younger (median, 65 years) in Hispanics compared to NHW (median, 70 years), and patients were more likely to present with renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min). Hispanics had a higher proportion of Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage I disease compared to NHW and NHB (P = .03), while there was no difference in cytogenetics between Hispanics and NHB/NHW. In the multivariate analysis, only high-risk disease and response to first-line therapy significantly affected survival. CONCLUSION: In this first and largest analysis of MM in Hispanics, we found that Hispanics present at a younger age, have a higher incidence of renal dysfunction, and have low R-ISS stage disease at presentation. With equal access to therapy, Hispanics have survival similar to NHW/NHB.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency/epidemiology , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Prospective Studies , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data
2.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 16(1): e92-e99, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31765266

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Geriatric assessment (GA) results predict toxicity/survival in older adults, yet GA is not routinely used in care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We tested a tablet-based modified GA (mGA) providing real-time results to clinicians. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five patients with MM aged ≥ 65 years facing a treatment decision from 4 sites completed a tablet-based mGA with Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Lawton Instrumental ADL, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and variables from the Cancer and Aging Research Group's Chemotherapy Toxicity Calculator. Providers reviewed the assessment results at the treatment visit. RESULTS: Patients were white (72%; n = 86), mean age was 72 years (range, 65-85 years), and averaged 7.71 minutes (range, 2-17 minutes) for survey completion. Providers averaged 3.2 minutes (range, 1-10 minutes) to review mGA results. Using International Myeloma Working Group frailty score, patients were fit (39%; n = 64), intermediate fit (33%; n = 55), or frail (28%; n = 46). Providers selected more aggressive treatments in 16.3% of patients and decreased treatment intensity in 34% of patients; treatment intensification was more common for fit patients and milder treatments for frail patients (χ2 = 20.02; P < .0001). Transplant eligibility significantly correlated with fit status and transplant ineligibility with frail status (P = .004). Outcomes on 144 patients 3 months post study visit showed 19.4% (n = 28) had grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities, 38.9% (n = 56) had dose modifications, and 18% (n = 26) had early therapy cessation. CONCLUSION: Limited patient time required for survey completion and provider time for results review show mGA can be easily incorporated into clinical workflow. Real-time mGA results indicating fit/frailty status influenced treatment decisions.


Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment/methods , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Precision Medicine/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Frail Elderly , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies
3.
Semin Oncol Nurs ; 33(3): 292-298, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28751187

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To review the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and the management of most common side effects. DATA SOURCES: Review of journal articles related to mAbs in MM. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic options for MM have improved dramatically and the development of mAbs has been associated with improvement in clinical outcomes and favorable toxicity profiles. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: With appropriate pre-medications and nursing management, mAbs are a well-tolerated treatment option for myeloma patients.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Humans , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...