Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on coronary revascularization and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: Benefits of pharmacologic omega-3 fatty acid administration in cardiovascular prevention are controversial. Particularly, effects on coronary revascularization are unclear; also debated are specific benefits of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). We investigated incident coronary revascularizations, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), unstable angina, and cardiovascular death, in subjects randomized to receive EPA or EPA + docosahexaenoic acid (EPA + DHA) vs. control. METHODS AND RESULTS: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted after MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library search. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Eighteen RCTs with 134 144 participants (primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention) receiving DHA + EPA (n = 52 498), EPA alone (n = 14 640), or control/placebo (n = 67 006) were included. Follow-up ranged from 4.5 months to 7.4 years. Overall, compared with controls, omega-3 supplementation reduced the risk of revascularization [0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.98; P = 0.001; P-heterogeneity = 0.0002; I2 = 68%], MI (0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.06; I2 = 41%), and cardiovascular death (0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.13; I2 = 33%). Lower risk was still observed in trials where most participants (≥60%) were on statin therapy. Compared with DHA + EPA, EPA alone showed a further significant risk reduction of revascularizations (0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88; P = 0.0002; P-interaction = 0.005) and all outcomes except HF. CONCLUSION: Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduced the risk of cardiovascular events and coronary revascularization, regardless of background statin use. Eicosapentaenoic acid alone produced greater benefits. The role of specific omega-3 molecules in primary vs. secondary prevention and the potential benefits of reduced revascularizations on overall health status and cost savings warrant further research.

It is debated whether pharmacologic administration of omega-3 fatty acids reduces cardiac events. In particular, it is unclear whether benefits are actually restricted to the use of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), or whether combined administration of EPA + docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is needed; furthermore, little is known about possible benefits of omega-3 fatty acids in reducing incidence of coronary revascularization procedures. In this meta-analysis of all published evidence of clinical trials comparing EPA alone or EPA + DHA vs. control (134 144 participants), we demonstrate the following: In the overall analysis of all trials, omega-3 supplementation reduced the risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death, to a modest extent. However, when trials administering EPA alone were separately analysed, a further significant risk reduction for cardiovascular outcomes was demonstrated. Importantly, these benefits were also observed in subjects who were already taking statins as part of their chronic therapy.Administration of omega-3 fatty acids, particularly EPA alone, was also associated with a substantial decrease in the risk for subsequent coronary revascularizations. Reduction of revascularization procedures may induce additional benefits on overall health status and associated cost savings.

Consensus document on diagnosis and management of familial hypercholesterolemia from the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA).

AIMS: Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder of lipoprotein metabolism that causes an increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Although early diagnosis and treatment of FH can significantly improve the cardiovascular prognosis, this disorder is underdiagnosed and undertreated. For these reasons the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA) assembled a Consensus Panel with the task to provide guidelines for FH diagnosis and treatment. DATA SYNTHESIS: Our guidelines include: i) an overview of the genetic complexity of FH and the role of candidate genes involved in LDL metabolism; ii) the prevalence of FH in the population; iii) the clinical criteria adopted for the diagnosis of FH; iv) the screening for ASCVD and the role of cardiovascular imaging techniques; v) the role of molecular diagnosis in establishing the genetic bases of the disorder; vi) the current therapeutic options in both heterozygous and homozygous FH. Treatment strategies and targets are currently based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, as the prognosis of FH largely depends on the magnitude of LDL-C reduction achieved by lipid-lowering therapies. Statins with or without ezetimibe are the mainstay of treatment. Addition of novel medications like PCSK9 inhibitors, ANGPTL3 inhibitors or lomitapide in homozygous FH results in a further reduction of LDL-C levels. LDL apheresis is indicated in FH patients with inadequate response to cholesterol-lowering therapies. CONCLUSION: FH is a common, treatable genetic disorder and, although our understanding of this disease has improved, many challenges still remain with regard to its identification and management.

Use of combination therapy is associated with improved LDL-cholesterol management: 1-year follow-up results from the European observational SANTORINI study.

AIM: To assess whether implementation of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines observed between 2020-2021 improved between 2021-2022 in the SANTORINI study. METHODS: High- or very-high cardiovascular (CV) risk patients were recruited across 14 European countries from March 2020-February 2021, with 1-year prospective follow-up until May 2022. Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and 2019 ESC/EAS risk-based low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment (defined as <1.4 mmol/L for patients at very high CV risk and <1.8 mmol/L for patients at high CV risk) at 1-year follow-up were compared with baseline. . RESULTS: Of 9559 patients enrolled, 9136 (2626 high risk, 6504 very high risk) had any follow-up data, and 7210 (2033 high risk, 5173 very high risk) had baseline and follow-up LDL-C data. LLT was escalated in one-third of patients and unchanged in two-thirds. Monotherapy and combination therapy usage rose from 53.6% and 25.6% to 57.1% and 37.9%, respectively. Mean LDL-C levels decreased from 2.4 mmol/L to 2.0 mmol/L. Goal attainment improved from 21.2% to 30.9%, largely driven by LLT use among those not on LLT at baseline. Goal attainment was greater with combination therapy compared with monotherapy at follow-up (39.4 vs 25.5%). CONCLUSIONS: LLT use and achievement of risk-based lipid goals increased over 1-year follow-up particularly when combination LLT was used. Nonetheless, most patients remained above goal, hence strategies are needed to improve implementation of combination LLT.

Cardiovascular diseases, a group of disorders of the heart and blood vessels, are the most common cause of death worldwide. Lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in the bloodstream reduces the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, such as heart attacks and strokes. Guidelines recommend that those at highest risk of cardiovascular disease should achieve the lowest levels of LDL cholesterol. Several medications are available that help lower LDL cholesterol levels and prevent cardiovascular events, however, recent studies have shown that the majority of patients continue to have LDL cholesterol levels above optimal value in part due to suboptimal use of these medications. Here we report the results after 1 year of follow-up of the SANTORINI study (started in 2020) which aimed to document the management of LDL cholesterol in clinical practice across 14 countries in Europe. We found that better control of LDL cholesterol occurred when more than one drug was used (combination therapy). Use of combination therapy was low at the start of the study 25.6% but increased over 1 year to 37.9%, resulting in better control of LDL cholesterol at 1 year than observed at the start of the study. Nonetheless, only 31% of patients achieved their LDL cholesterol target levels based on the European guidelines. Greater use of combination therapies is needed in order to improve the overall population level control of LDL cholesterol.

Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia on lipoprotein apheresis initiated during childhood: long-term follow-up of an international cohort from two registries.

BACKGROUND: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disease characterised by extremely high plasma LDL cholesterol from birth, causing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at a young age. Lipoprotein apheresis in combination with lipid-lowering drugs effectively reduce LDL cholesterol, but long-term health outcomes of such treatment are unknown. We aimed to investigate the long-term cardiovascular outcomes associated with lipoprotein apheresis initiated in childhood or adolescence. METHODS: In this cohort study, data were drawn from the HoFH International Clinical Collaboration (HICC) and the international registry for Children with Homozygous Hypercholesterolemia on Lipoprotein Apheresis (CHAIN). An overall cohort included patients diagnosed with HoFH aged 0-18 years who were alive and in follow-up between Jan 1, 2010, and Nov 8, 2021, and whose high plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations made them eligible for lipoprotein apheresis. To compare cardiovascular outcomes, patients who initiated lipoprotein apheresis in childhood (lipoprotein apheresis group) and patients who only received lipid-lowering drugs (pharmacotherapy-only group) were matched by sex and untreated plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, peripheral artery disease, carotid endarterectomy, angina pectoris, and supra-aortic or aortic stenosis (collectively referred to as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease), for which survival analyses were performed in the matched cohort. Cox regression analyses were used to compare disease-free survival between cohorts and to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis, untreated plasma LDL cholesterol concentration, and number of lipid-lowering therapies other than lipoprotein apheresis. FINDINGS: The overall cohort included 404 patients with a median age at diagnosis of 6·0 years (IQR 3·0-9·5) and median untreated plasma LDL cholesterol of 17·8 mmol/L (14·7-20·8). The matched cohorts included 250 patients (125 patients per group), with a median untreated LDL cholesterol of 17·2 mmol/L (14·8-19·7). Mean reduction in plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations between baseline and final follow-up was greater in the lipoprotein apheresis group (-55% [95% CI -60 to -51] vs -31% [-36 to -25]; p<0·0001). Patients in the lipoprotein apheresis group had longer atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-free survival (adjusted HR 0·52 [95% CI 0·32-0·85]) and longer cardiovascular death-free survival (0·0301 [0·0021-0·4295]). Cardiovascular death was more common in the pharmacotherapy-only group than in the lipoprotein apheresis group (ten [8%] vs one [1%]; p=0·010), whereas median age at coronary artery bypass grafting was lower in the lipoprotein apheresis group than in the pharmacotherapy-only group (15·0 years [IQR 12·0-24·0] vs 30·5 years [19·0-33·8]; p=0·037). INTERPRETATION: Among patients with HoFH, lipoprotein apheresis initiated during childhood and adolescence is associated with reduced long-term risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and death, and clear benefits of early initiation of high-frequency treatment on reducing plasma cholesterol were found. Consensus recommendations are now needed to guide more widespread and timely use of lipoprotein apheresis for children with HoFH, and research is required to further optimise treatment and ensure benefits of early and aggressive treatment delivery are balanced against effects on quality of life. FUNDING: Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; European Atherosclerosis Society; and the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Obicetrapib on top of maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: rationale and designs of BROADWAY and BROOKLYN.

BACKGROUND: Obicetrapib, a novel, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when added to statins with or without ezetimibe. By substantially reducing LDL-C, obicetrapib has the potential to lower atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) whose LDL-C levels remain high despite treatment with available maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, addressing an unmet medical need in a patient population at high risk for cardiovascular events. METHODS AND RESULTS: BROADWAY (NCT05142722) and BROOKLYN (NCT05425745) are ongoing placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized Phase III trials designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with a history of ASCVD and/or underlying HeFH whose LDL-C is not adequately controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 84. Other endpoints included changes in Apo B, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, Apo A1, Lp(a), and triglycerides in addition to parameters evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. BROADWAY also included an adjudicated assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events, measurements of glucose homeostasis, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy. A total of 2,532 participants were randomized in BROADWAY and 354 in BROOKLYN to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or placebo (2:1) for 365 days with follow-up through 35 days after the last dose. Results from both trials are anticipated in 2024. CONCLUSION: These trials will provide safety and efficacy data to support the potential use of obicetrapib among patients with ASCVD or HeFH with elevated LDL-C for whom existing therapies are not sufficiently effective or well-tolerated.

[STEP-RCV Project - A scientific expert panel for patients at high and very high cardiovascular risk: how to streamline lipid-lowering therapy]. / STEP-RCV Project: ScienTific Expert Panel per i pazienti a rischio cardiovascolare alto e molto alto: come ottimizzare la terapia ipolipemizzante.

Over the last decade, several innovative therapeutic options have been developed and marketed for the management of hypercholesterolemia. However, the impossibility of a contextual update of international guidelines and the limits imposed by national regulatory authorities do not allow the use of these treatments in many patients, in particular in those at higher cardiovascular risk. Real-world studies show that the use of lipid-lowering therapies is inadequate even among patients at higher cardiovascular risk, with only 20% achieving recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and the use of combination therapies implemented in only 24% of patients. This review aims to highlight the benefits of an approach based on combination therapy and to propose a therapeutic algorithm that includes oral combination therapy, where necessary also in triple association (statin, ezetimibe and bempedoic acid), as an initial approach based on the most favorable cost-effectiveness ratio for patients at higher cardiovascular risk and the use of injectable anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 therapies if the recommended LDL-C goal is not achieved.

European Lipid Guidelines and Cardiovascular Risk Estimation: Current Status and Future Challenges.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Genetic, experimental, epidemiologic, and clinical data support the causal role of elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The recommendations of the 2019 European guidelines are based on the concept of differential CV risk, which in turn defines the LDL-C goals that should be achieved. RECENT FINDINGS: The 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for dyslipidaemia use the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) model to assess CV risk, which provides a 10-year risk of fatal CV event. The SCORE model has recently been updated to reflect current rates of cardiovascular disease in Europe. The new SCORE2 model provides estimates of the 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events in people aged 40-69 years, thus improving the identification of individuals at higher risk of a CVD event. However, as in the SCORE age is the main determinant of risk, young people have a relatively low estimated 10-year risk of a CV event even with high levels of one or more causal risk factors. Individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia, who have elevated LDL-C levels from birth and have a high risk of premature CVD, are one example. The concept of cumulative LDL exposure is thus becoming increasingly important. This is also supported by Mendelian randomisation studies showing that carrying genetic variants associated with lower LDL-C levels reduces CV risk. These observations have introduced the concept of "cholesterol-years", which takes into account both LDL-C levels and time of exposure. It is crucial that future European guidelines pay more attention to this point.

Longevity-associated BPIFB4 gene counteracts the inflammatory signaling.

BACKGROUND: Increased levels of pro-inflammatory proteins in plasma can be detected in older individuals and associate with the so called chronic low-grade inflammation, which contributes to a faster progression of aged-related cardiovascular (CV) diseases, including frailty, neurodegeneration, gastro-intestinal diseases and disorders reflected by alterations in the composition of gut microbiota. However, successful genetic programme of long-living individuals alters the trajectory of the ageing process, by promoting an efficient immune response that can counterbalance deleterious effects of inflammation and the CV complications. This is the case of BPIFB4 gene in which, homozygosity for a four single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotype, the Longevity-Associated Variant (LAV) correlates with prolonged health span and reduced risk of CV complications and inflammation. The relation between LAV-BPIFB4 and inflammation has been proven in different experimental models, here we hypothesized that also human homozygous carriers of LAV-BPIFB4 gene may experience a lower inflammatory burden as detected by plasma proteomics that could explain their favourable CV risk trajectory over time. Moreover, we explored the therapeutic effects of LAV-BPIFB4 in inflammatory disease and monolayer model of intestinal barrier. RESULTS: We used high-throughput proteomic approach to explore the profiles of circulating proteins from 591 baseline participants selected from the PLIC cohort according to the BPIFB4 genotype to identify the signatures and differences of BPIFB4 genotypes useful for health and disease management. The observational analysis identified a panel of differentially expressed circulating proteins between the homozygous LAV-BPIFB4 carriers and the other alternative BPIFB4 genotypes highlighting in the latter ones a higher grade of immune-inflammatory markers. Moreover, in vitro studies performed on intestinal epithelial organs from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and monolayer model of intestinal barrier demonstrated the benefit of LAV-BPIFB4 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Homozygosity for LAV-BPIFB4 results in the attenuation of inflammation in PLIC cohort and IBD patients providing preliminary evidences for its therapeutic use in inflammatory disorders that need to be further characterized and confirmed by independent studies.

Effect of lipid-lowering therapies on C-reactive protein levels: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chronic low-degree inflammation is a hallmark of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease. To assess the effect of lipid-lowering therapies on C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of inflammation, we conducted a meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines. Databases were searched from inception to July 2023. Inclusion criteria were: (i) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in human, Phase II, III, or IV; (ii) English language; (iii) comparing the effect of lipid-lowering drugs vs. placebo; (iv) reporting the effects on CRP levels; (v) with intervention duration of more than 3 weeks; (vi) and sample size (for both intervention and control group) over than 100 subjects. The between-group (treatment-placebo) CRP absolute mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each drug class separately. A total of 171 668 subjects from 53 RCTs were included. CRP levels (mg/L) were significantly decreased by statins [-0.65 (-0.87 to -0.43), bempedoic acid; -0.43 (-0.67 to -0.20), ezetimibe; -0.28 (-0.48 to -0.08)], and omega-3 fatty acids [omega3FAs, -0.27 (-0.52 to -0.01)]. CRP was reduced by -0.40 (-1.17 to 0.38) with fibrates, although not statistically significant. A slight increase of CRP concentration was observed for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors [0.11 (0.07-0.14)] and cholesteryl-ester transfer protein inhibitors [0.10 (0.00-0.21)], the latter being not statistically significant. Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant correlation between changes in CRP and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) or triglycerides. Statins, bempedoic acid, ezetimibe, and omega3FAs significantly reduce serum CRP concentration, independently of LDL-C reductions. The impact of this anti-inflammatory effect in terms of CV prevention needs further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: analysis of pooled patient-level data from phase 3 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) often cannot reach guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals despite multidrug therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid as an add-on therapy for lowering LDL-C in patients with HeFH. METHODS: Pooled data from two 52-week phase 3 clinical trials of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and/or HeFH receiving maximally tolerated statin therapy (randomized 2:1 to bempedoic acid or placebo) were analyzed by HeFH status. Endpoints included changes from baseline to week 12 (and up to week 52) in LDL-C and other lipid parameters, achievement of LDL-C goals, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 217 (bempedoic acid, 146; placebo, 71) patients with HeFH and 2,792 (bempedoic acid, 1,864; placebo, 928) without HeFH were included (mean baseline LDL-C, 172.8 mg/dL and 102.6 mg/dL, respectively). Bempedoic acid significantly lowered LDL-C at week 12 vs. placebo regardless of HeFH status (with HeFH, -21.2%; without HeFH, -18.2% [both P<0.0001]). Bempedoic acid significantly reduced other lipid parameters and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein vs. placebo regardless of HeFH status (all P≤0.01). Among patients with HeFH treated with bempedoic acid, 32% and 27% achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dL at weeks 12 and 52, respectively. Overall treatment-emergent adverse event incidence was comparable across all four groups (74.7-77.5%). CONCLUSION: Bempedoic acid significantly lowered LDL-C levels vs. placebo and was generally well tolerated in all patients, with no new safety findings in patients with HeFH, despite more intensive lipid-lowering therapy in patients with vs. without HeFH.

Contemporary lipid-lowering management and risk of cardiovascular events in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: insights from the Italian LIPIGEN Registry.

AIMS: The availability of novel lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) has remarkably changed the clinical management of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH). The impact of these advances was evaluated in a cohort of 139 HoFH patients followed in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of 139 HoFH patients, along with information about LLTs and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at baseline and after a median follow-up of 5 years, were retrospectively retrieved from the records of patients enrolled in the LIPid transport disorders Italian GEnetic Network-Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (LIPIGEN-FH) Registry. The annual rates of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (MACE-plus) during follow-up were compared before and after baseline. Additionally, the lifelong survival free from MACE-plus was compared with that of the historical LIPIGEN HoFH cohort. At baseline, LDL-C level was 332 ± 138 mg/dL. During follow-up, the potency of LLTs was enhanced and, at the last visit, 15.8% of patients were taking quadruple therapy. Consistently, LDL-C decreased to an average value of 124 mg/dL corresponding to a 58.3% reduction (Pt < 0.001), with the lowest value (∼90 mg/dL) reached in patients receiving proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors and lomitapide and/or evinacumab as add-on therapies. The average annual MACE-plus rate in the 5-year follow-up was significantly lower than that observed during the 5 years before baseline visit (21.7 vs. 56.5 per 1000 patients/year; P = 0.0016). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the combination of novel and conventional LLTs significantly improved LDL-C control with a signal of better cardiovascular prognosis in HoFH patients. Overall, these results advocate the use of intensive, multidrug LLTs to effectively manage HoFH.

Contemporary real-world data from the Italian cohort of patients affected by homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia demonstrated that the addition of novel, low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-independent medications to conventional therapies allowed the achievement of unprecedented low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values with a trend towards a reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Genetic heterogeneity of familial hypercholesterolaemia in two populations from two different countries.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetically determined monogenic disorder of predominantly autosomal dominant inheritance. A number of studies on differences in the genetic profile of patients with FH have demonstrated the importance of a more substantive evaluation of genetic features. The aim of this study was to evaluate the genetic profile of patients with clinical FH among Italian and Russian patients. METHODS: We included 144 Italian and 79 Russian FH patients; clinical diagnosis was based on the same criteria. Patients were divided in: positive to genetic test (one causative variant), inconclusive (only variants of uncertain clinical significance [VUS]), and negative (with likely benign/benign variants, heterozygous variants in LDLRAP1 gene, or without causative variants). RESULTS: The genetic test was positive in 76.4 % of the Italian patients and in 49.4 % of the Russian patients. The presence of VUS alone was detected in 7.6 % and in 19.0 % (p < 0.001), respectively. Among patients with positive genetic diagnosis, pre-treatment LDL-C levels were higher in the Russian cohort (353.5 ± 111.3 vs. 302.7 ± 52.1 mg/dL, p = 0.009), as well as the percentage of treated patients (53.8 % vs. 14.5 %, p < 0.001) and the prevalence of premature coronary heart disease (12.8 % vs. 3.6 %, p = 0.039). Among patients carrying only VUS, mean pre-treatment LDL-C levels were similar between the cohorts (299.5 ± 68.1 vs. 295.3 ± 46.8 mg/dL, p = 0.863). Among pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and VUS, only 5 % and 4 % was shared between the two cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: The genetic background of patients clinically diagnosed with FH in two different countries is characterized by high variability.

Exploring apolipoprotein C-III: pathophysiological and pharmacological relevance.

The availability of pharmacological approaches able to effectively reduce circulating LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) has led to a substantial reduction in the risk of atherosclerosis-related cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, a residual cardiovascular (CV) risk persists in treated individuals with optimal levels of LDL-C. Additional risk factors beyond LDL-C are involved, and among these, elevated levels of triglycerides (TGs) and TG-rich lipoproteins are causally associated with an increased CV risk. Apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) is a key regulator of TG metabolism and hence circulating levels through several mechanisms including the inhibition of lipoprotein lipase activity and alterations in the affinity of apoC-III-containing lipoproteins for both the hepatic receptors involved in their removal and extracellular matrix in the arterial wall. Genetic studies have clarified the role of apoC-III in humans, establishing a causal link with CVD and showing that loss-of-function mutations in the APOC3 gene are associated with reduced TG levels and reduced risk of coronary heart disease. Currently available hypolipidaemic drugs can reduce TG levels, although to a limited extent. Substantial reductions in TG levels can be obtained with new drugs that target specifically apoC-III; these include two antisense oligonucleotides, one small interfering RNA and an antibody.

Quality control to improve LDL-cholesterol management in patients with acute coronary syndromes based on the ACS EuroPath IV project.

AIMS: We performed quality control of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with a view to proposing corrective actions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a Define Measure Analysis Improve Control (DMAIC) approach applied to data from the ACS EuroPath IV survey, we measured attainment of two quality indicators (QIs) related to lipid-lowering treatment: (i) prescription of high-intensity statins (or equipotent treatment) before discharge, and (ii) proportion with LDL-cholesterol <55 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) during follow-up. A total of 530 European cardiologists responded and provided data for up to 5 patients from their centre, for acute and follow-up phases. Corrective measures are proposed to increase the rate of attainment of both QIs. Attainment of the first QI was measured in 929 acute-phase patients, 99% had LLT prescribed at discharge and 75% of patients fulfilled the first QI. Attainment of the second QI was assessed in 1721 patients with follow-up. The second QI was reached in 31% of patients. The DMAIC approach yielded 10 potential changes in prescription, 3 for the first and 7 for the second QI. The overall strategy is 'Fire to Target', i.e. early intensification of the LLT using statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitors, and is presented as an algorithm for routine application. CONCLUSION: Quality control for LLT, based on the ACS EuroPath IV survey, detected 10 potential changes in prescription that could enhance attainment of 2 QIs. Whether the Fire to Target strategy will be adopted and effective needs to be assessed in further steps of the EuroPath Quality programme.

How to Handle Elevated Triglycerides: Life after PROMINENT.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertriglyceridaemia (HTG) is a common condition characterised by elevated levels of plasma triglycerides (TG), which are transported in the blood mainly by TG-rich lipoproteins (TRL). Elevated TG levels (150-400 mg/dL) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Severe HTG (>880 mg/dL) is associated with a risk of acute pancreatitis only. Randomised clinical trials investigating the clinical benefit of TG-lowering drugs in patients with elevated TG levels have provided conflicting results. RECENT FINDINGS: Elevated TG levels are only one marker of altered lipid/lipoprotein metabolism and indeed reflect altered concentrations of one or more classes or subfractions of TRL, which in turn may have a different association with CV risk. Fibrates, the drugs most commonly used to treat HTG, provide cardiovascular benefits to only a specific subgroup of patients. The lack of clinical benefit from pemafibrate has emphasised the concept that lowering TG levels is not sufficient to reduce the CV risk unless it is accompanied by a reduction in the number of circulating atherogenic lipoproteins, which can be assessed by determining apolipoprotein B levels. Treatment with omega-3 fatty acids was also ineffective in reducing CV risk, with the exception of icosapent ethyl, which, however, appears to have beneficial effects beyond lipids. New drugs are currently being developed that aim to lower TG levels by targeting apolipoprotein C-III or angiopoietin-like-3, both of which are involved in the metabolism of TGs. TG reduction can be achieved by various drugs, but most of them are ineffective in reducing CV risk. The results of outcome studies on new TG-lowering drugs will clarify whether lowering apoB levels is critical to achieve clinical benefit.

Emerging therapies in dyslipidaemias.

Several observations have shown that elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are a cause of cardiovascular disease. Lowering LDL-C is a key strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk, with a continuous linear correlation between LDL-C reduction and cardiovascular benefit. Based on these observations, current guidelines have further lowered LDL-C goals and call for the use of more effective therapeutic interventions. In addition to statins, ezetimibe and the monoclonal antibodies targeting PCSK9, several new lipid-lowering agents are currently in phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate their clinical effects, and more are in development. The use of combination therapies targeting different pathways can increase the effectiveness of treatment.

European guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidaemias: New concepts and future challenges.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is one of the most important causal factors for ASCVD. Based on the evidence of the clinical benefits of lowering LDL-C, the current 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines provide guidance for optimal management of people with dyslipidaemia. These guidelines include new and revised concepts, with a general tightening of LDL-C goals to be achieved, especially for patients at high and very high cardiovascular risk, based on the results of clinical trials of the recently approved drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. However, some issues are still open for discussion. Among others, the concept of lifetime exposure to elevated LDL-C levels will probably drive the pharmacological approach and future guidelines. In addition, other factors such as non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) are becoming increasingly important in determining cardiovascular risk. Finally, there is the question of whether combination therapy should be used as the first step to maximise the effectiveness of the pharmacological approach, avoiding the stepwise approach, which is likely to have a detrimental effect on adherence. Given the ever-changing landscape and the availability of new drugs targeting other important lipids, future guidelines will need to consider all these issues.

Refinement of the diagnostic approach for the identification of children and adolescents affected by familial hypercholesterolemia: Evidence from the LIPIGEN study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to describe the limitations of familiar hypercholesterolemia (FH) diagnosis in childhood based on the presence of the typical features of FH, such as physical sings of cholesterol accumulation and personal or family history of premature cardiovascular disease or hypercholesterolemia, comparing their prevalence in the adult and paediatric FH population, and to illustrate how additional information can lead to a more effective diagnosis of FH at a younger age. METHODS: From the Italian LIPIGEN cohort, we selected 1188 (≥18 years) and 708 (<18 years) genetically-confirmed heterozygous FH, with no missing personal FH features. The prevalence of personal and familial FH features was compared between the two groups. For a sub-group of the paediatric cohort (N = 374), data about premature coronary heart disease (CHD) in second-degree family members were also included in the evaluation. RESULTS: The lower prevalence of typical FH features in children/adolescents vs adults was confirmed: the prevalence of tendon xanthoma was 2.1% vs 13.1%, and arcus cornealis was present in 1.6% vs 11.2% of the cohorts, respectively. No children presented clinical history of premature CHD or cerebral/peripheral vascular disease compared to 8.8% and 5.6% of adults, respectively. The prevalence of premature CHD in first-degree relatives was significantly higher in adults compared to children/adolescents (38.9% vs 19.7%). In the sub-cohort analysis, a premature CHD event in parents was reported in 63 out of 374 subjects (16.8%), but the percentage increased to 54.0% extending the evaluation also to second-degree relatives. CONCLUSIONS: In children, the typical FH features are clearly less informative than in adults. A more thorough data collection, adding information about second-degree relatives, could improve the diagnosis of FH at younger age.