Medial and Lateral Tibiofemoral Compressive Forces in Patients Following Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty During Stationary Cycling.

Patients following unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) display interlimb differences in knee joint kinetics during gait and more recently, stationary cycling. The purpose of this study was to use musculoskeletal modeling to estimate total, medial, and lateral tibiofemoral compressive forces for patients following TKA during stationary cycling. Fifteen patients of unilateral TKA, from the same surgeon, participated in cycling at 2 workrates (80 and 100 W). A knee model (OpenSim 3.2) was used to estimate total, medial, and lateral tibiofemoral compressive forces for replaced and nonreplaced limbs. A 2 × 2 (limb × workrate) and a 2 × 2 × 2 (compartment × limb × workrate) analysis of variance were run on the selected variables. Peak medial tibiofemoral compressive force was 23.5% lower for replaced compared to nonreplaced limbs (P = .004, G = 0.80). Peak medial tibiofemoral compressive force was 48.0% greater than peak lateral tibiofemoral compressive force in nonreplaced limbs (MD = 344.5 N, P < .001, G = 1.6) with no difference in replaced limbs (P = .274). Following TKA, patients have greater medial compartment loading on their nonreplaced compared to their replaced limbs and ipsilateral lateral compartment loading. This disproportionate loading may be cause for concern regarding exacerbating contralateral knee osteoarthritis.

Knee joint biomechanics of patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty during stationary cycling.

Stationary cycling is typically recommended following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) operations. However, knee joint biomechanics during cycling remains mostly unknown for TKA patients. Biomechanical differences between the replaced and non-replaced limb may inform applications of cycling in TKA rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to examine the knee joint biomechanics of TKA patients during stationary cycling. Fifteen TKA participants cycled at 80 revolutions per minute and workrates of 80 W and 100 W while kinematics (240 Hz) and pedal reaction forces using a pair of instrumented pedals (1200 Hz) were collected. A 2x2 (limb × workrate) repeated measures ANOVA was run with an alpha of 0.05. Peak knee extension moment (KEM, p = 0.034) and vertical pedal reaction force (p = 0.038) were significantly reduced in the replaced limbs compared to non-replaced limbs by 21.3% and 5.3%, respectively. Peak KEM did not change for TKA patients with the increased workrate (p = 0.750). However, both peak hip extension moment (p = 0.009) and ankle plantarflexion moment (p = 0.017) increased due to increased workrate. Patients following TKA showed similar decreases in peak KEM and vertical pedal reaction force in their replaced compared to non-replaced limbs, as previously seen in gait. Patients of TKA may rely on their hip and ankle extensors to increases in workrate. Increasing intensity by 20 W did not exacerbate any inter-limb differences for peak KEM and vertical PRF.