Use of a mixed reality system for navigational mapping during cardiac electrophysiological testing does not prolong case duration: A subanalysis from the Cardiac Augmented REality study.

Background: CommandEP™ is a mixed reality (MXR) system for cardiac electrophysiological (EP) procedures that provides a real-time 3-dimensional digital image of cardiac geometry and catheter locations. In a previous study, physicians using the system demonstrated improved navigational accuracy. This study investigated the impact of the CommandEP system on EP procedural times compared to the standard-of-care electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS) display. Objective: The purpose of this retrospective case-controlled analysis was to evaluate the impact of a novel MXR interface on EP procedural times compared to a case-matched cohort. Methods: Cases from the Cardiac Augmented REality (CARE) study were matched for diagnosis and weight using a contemporary cohort. Procedural time was compared from the roll-in and full implementation cohort. During routine EP procedures, operators performed tasks during the postablation waiting phase, including creation of cardiac geometry and 5-point navigation under 2 conditions: (1) EAMS first; and (2) CommandEP. Results: From a total of 16 CARE study patients, the 10 full implementation patients were matched to a cohort of 20 control patients (2 controls:1 CARE, matched according to pathology and age/weight). No statistical difference in total case times between CARE study patients vs control group (118 ± 29 minutes vs 97 ± 20 minutes; P = .07) or fluoroscopy times (6 ± 4 minutes vs 7 ± 6 minutes; P = .9). No significant difference in case duration for CARE study patients comparing roll-in vs full-implementation cohort (121 ± 26 minutes vs 118 ± 29 minutes; P = .96). CommandEP wear time during cases was significantly longer in full implementation cases (53 ± 24 minutes vs 24 ± 5 minutes; P = .0009). During creation of a single cardiac geometry, no significant time difference was noted between CommandEP vs EAMS (284 ± 45 seconds vs 268 ± 43 seconds; P = .1) or fluoroscopy use (9 ± 19 seconds vs 6 ± 18 seconds; P = .25). During point navigation tasks, there was no difference in total time (CommandEP 31 ± 14 seconds vs EAMS 28 ± 15 seconds; P = .16) or fluoroscopy time (CommandEP 0 second vs EAMS 0 second). Conclusion: MXR did not prolong overall procedural time compared to a matched cohort. There was no prolongation in study task completion time. Future studies with experienced CommandEP users directly assessing procedural time and task completion time in a randomized study population would be of interest.

Excitation properties of computational models of unmyelinated peripheral axons.

Biophysically based computational models of nerve fibers are important tools for designing electrical stimulation therapies, investigating drugs that affect ion channels, and studying diseases that affect neurons. Although peripheral nerves are primarily composed of unmyelinated axons (i.e., C-fibers), most modeling efforts focused on myelinated axons. We implemented the single-compartment model of vagal afferents from Schild et al. (1994) (Schild JH, Clark JW, Hay M, Mendelowitz D, Andresen MC, Kunze DL. J Neurophysiol 71: 2338-2358, 1994) and extended the model into a multicompartment axon, presenting the first cable model of a C-fiber vagal afferent. We also implemented the updated parameters from the Schild and Kunze (1997) model (Schild JH, Kunze DL. J Neurophysiol 78: 3198-3209, 1997). We compared the responses of these novel models with those of three published models of unmyelinated axons (Rattay F, Aberham M. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40: 1201-1209, 1993; Sundt D, Gamper N, Jaffe DB. J Neurophysiol 114: 3140-3153, 2015; Tigerholm J, Petersson ME, Obreja O, Lampert A, Carr R, Schmelz M, Fransén E. J Neurophysiol 111: 1721-1735, 2014) and with experimental data from single-fiber recordings. Comparing the two models by Schild et al. (1994, 1997) revealed that differences in rest potential and action potential shape were driven by changes in maximum conductances rather than changes in sodium channel dynamics. Comparing the five model axons, the conduction speeds and strength-duration responses were largely within expected ranges, but none of the models captured the experimental threshold recovery cycle-including a complete absence of late subnormality in the models-and their action potential shapes varied dramatically. The Tigerholm et al. (2014) model best reproduced the experimental data, but these modeling efforts make clear that additional data are needed to parameterize and validate future models of autonomic C-fibers.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Peripheral nerves are primarily composed of unmyelinated axons, and there is growing interest in electrical stimulation of the autonomic nervous system to treat various diseases. We present the first cable model of an unmyelinated vagal nerve fiber and compare its ion channel isoforms and conduction responses with other published models of unmyelinated axons, establishing important tools for advancing modeling of autonomic nerves.

A compact high resolution flat panel PET detector based on the new 4-side buttable MPPC for biomedical applications.

Compact high-resolution panel detectors using virtual pinhole (VP) PET geometry can be inserted into existing clinical or pre-clinical PET systems to improve regional spatial resolution and sensitivity. Here we describe a compact panel PET detector built using the new Though Silicon Via (TSV) multi-pixel photon counters (MPPC) detector. This insert provides high spatial resolution and good timing performance for multiple bio-medical applications. Because the TSV MPPC design eliminates wire bonding and has a package dimension which is very close to the MPPC's active area, it is 4-side buttable. The custom designed MPPC array (based on Hamamatsu S12641-PA-50(x)) used in the prototype is composed of 4 × 4 TSV-MPPC cells with a 4.46 mm pitch in both directions. The detector module has 16 × 16 lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) crystal array, with each crystal measuring 0.92 × 0.92 × 3 mm3 with 1.0 mm pitch. The outer diameter of the detector block is 16.8 × 16.8 mm2. Thirty-two such blocks will be arranged in a 4 × 8 array with 1 mm gaps to form a panel detector with detection area around 7 cm × 14 cm in the full-size detector. The flood histogram acquired with Ge-68 source showed excellent crystal separation capability with all 256 crystals clearly resolved. The detector module's mean, standard deviation, minimum (best) and maximum (worst) energy resolution were 10.19%, +/-0.68%, 8.36% and 13.45% FWHM, respectively. The measured coincidence time resolution between the block detector and a fast reference detector (around 200 ps single photon timing resolution) was 0.95 ns. When tested with Siemens Cardinal electronics the performance of the detector blocks remain consistent. These results demonstrate that the TSV-MPPC is a promising photon sensor for use in a flat panel PET insert composed of many high resolution compact detector modules.