Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev Argent Microbiol ; 47(3): 190-5, 2015.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26383246

ABSTRACT

Rapid identification of microorganisms is critical in hospitalized infected patients. Blood culture is currently the gold standard for detecting and identifying microorganisms causing bacteremia or sepsis. The introduction of mass spectrometry by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF MS) in microbiology laboratories, especially in microorganisms growing in blood culture bottles, provides rapid identification. This study evaluates the performance of the Maldi Sepsityper Biotyper procedure (hereinafter, MS) compared to that of an in-home method (hereinafter, HF). Eight hundred and forty (840) positive blood culture bottles were processed using the HF procedure, 542 of which were also processed using MS. The organisms were identified in 670 (79.76%) and 391 (72.14%) bottles respectively (p = 0,0013). This study demonstrates the effectiveness of both procedures for identifying microorganisms directly from positive blood culture bottles. However, the HF procedure proved to be more effective than MS, especially in the presence of Gram positive organisms.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Blood/microbiology , Fungemia/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Mycological Typing Techniques/methods , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/methods , Yeasts/isolation & purification , Coinfection , Gram-Negative Bacteria/classification , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/blood , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacteria/classification , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/blood , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Specimen Handling , Time Factors , Yeasts/classification
2.
Rev. argent. microbiol ; 47(3): 190-195, set. 2015. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-843125

ABSTRACT

La identificación rápida de microorganismos es crítica, en especial en pacientes sépticos hospitalizados. La espectrometría de masas conocida como matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of- flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) permite la identificación directa desde botellas de hemocultivos positivos en forma rápida y sencilla. Este estudio evaluó el desempeño del procedimiento basado en el sistema MALDI Biotyper que utiliza el kit comercial MALDI Sepsityper de Bruker Daltonics (en adelante, MS) frente a uno artesanal (en adelante, HF). Se procesaron 840 botellas de hemocultivos positivos con HF y 542 de estas fueron evaluadas también con MS. Se logró la identificación de los microorganismos en 670 (79,76 %) y 391 (72,14 %) botellas, respectivamente (p = 0,0013). Se demostró la efectividad de ambos procedimientos para la identificación de microorganismos desde frascos de hemocultivos positivos. Sin embargo, el procedimiento HF fue superior al MS, en especial frente a bacterias gram positivas.


Rapid identification of microorganisms is critical in hospitalized infected patients. Blood culture is currently the gold standard for detecting and identifying microorganisms causing bacteremia or sepsis. The introduction of mass spectrometry by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF MS) in microbiology laboratories, especially in microorganisms growing in blood culture bottles, provides rapid identification. This study evaluates the performance of the Maldi Sepsityper Biotyper procedure (hereinafter, MS) compared to that of an in-home method (hereinafter, HF). Eight hundred and forty (840) positive blood culture bottles were processed using the HF procedure, 542 of which were also processed using MS. The organisms were identified in 670 (79. 76 %) and 391 (72. 14 %) bottles respectively (p = 0,0013). This study demonstrates the effectiveness of both procedures for identifying microorganisms directly from positive blood culture bottles. However, the HF procedure proved to be more effective than MS, especially in the presence of Gram positive organisms.


Subject(s)
Mass Spectrometry/methods , Bacterial Infections/classification , Laboratory and Fieldwork Analytical Methods/analysis , Blood Culture/statistics & numerical data , Mass Spectrometry/statistics & numerical data , Bacterial Infections/blood , Effectiveness , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/classification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...