Quality assurance of medicines supplied to low-income and middle-income countries: poor products in shiny boxes?

OBJECTIVE: In today's context of globalisation of pharmaceutical production and distribution, international and national procurement agencies play a de facto key role in defining the quality of medicines available in sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the compliance of a sample of pharmaceutical distributors active in sub-Saharan Africa with the standards of the WHO guideline 'Model Quality Assurance System (WHO MQAS) for procurement agencies', and we investigated factors favouring or hindering the adequate implementation of the guideline. METHODS: We used mixed-methods methodology to analyse quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative study consisted of a retrospective secondary analysis of data collected by QUAMED (Quality Medicines for all), a partnership that pleads for universal access to quality-assured medicines. The qualitative survey consisted of formal and informal interviews with key informants. We adopted an embedded multiple-case study design. FINDINGS: Our analysis suggests that international distributors based in Europe perform, on average, better than sub-Saharan African distributors. However, some weaknesses are ubiquitous and concern critical processes, such as the initial selection of the products and the ongoing reassessment of their quality. This is due to several different factors: weak regulatory oversight, insufficient human/financial resources, weak negotiating power, limited judicial autonomy and/or lack of institutional commitment to quality. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that pharmaceutical distributors active in sub-Saharan Africa generally do not apply stringent criteria for selecting products and suppliers. Therefore, product quality is not consistently assured but depends on the requirements of purchasers. While long-term solutions are awaited, the WHO MQAS guideline should be used as an evaluation and training tool to upgrade current standards.

Substandard medicines in resource-poor settings: a problem that can no longer be ignored.

The circulation of substandard medicines in the developing world is a serious clinical and public health concern. Problems include under or over concentration of ingredients, contamination, poor quality ingredients, poor stability and inadequate packaging. There are multiple causes. Drugs manufactured for export are not regulated to the same standard as those for domestic use, while regulatory agencies in the less-developed world are poorly equipped to assess and address the problem. A number of recent initiatives have been established to address the problem, most notably the WHO pre-qualification programme. However, much more action is required. Donors should encourage their partners to include more explicit quality requirements in their tender mechanisms, while purchasers should insist that producers and distributors supply drugs that comply with international quality standards. Governments in rich countries should not tolerate the export of substandard pharmaceutical products to poor countries, while developing country governments should improve their ability to detect substandard medicines.

Quality control of anti-tuberculosis fixed-dose combination formulations in the global market: an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality, and especially the dissolution properties of rifampicin, of fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulations of anti-tuberculosis agents manufactured by major market holders in the anti-tuberculosis sector and supplied for use in national tuberculosis control programmes. METHODS: Dissolution studies were performed for four formulations supplied by four different manufacturers in four dissolution media (0.1N and 0.01N HCl, phosphate buffer [PB] and 20% vegetable oil in PB), at four different agitation rates using USP apparatus II. The formulations were subjected to 4-week accelerated stability studies (40 degrees C / 75% RH) and evaluated for physical, chemical and dissolution stability. RESULTS: The formulations tested complied with pharmacopeial quality control (QC) tests. The extent of rifampicin release was independent of dissolution medium; however, a slight decrease in the dissolution rate was observed in two products. More than 75% of drug was released in 45 min at all agitation intensities except 30 rpm, and 20% oil in the medium reflected fed state. Formulations were stable in the packaging conditions recommended by the manufacturer for at least 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The formulations tested passed the QC tests and were found to be stable. A decrease in the rate, although not the extent, of dissolution necessitated multiple point dissolution in gastric and intestinal pH conditions to ensure consistency in in vivo bioavailability.

Requirements for anti-tuberculosis drug tender requests.

As more and more institutions and experts push for the use of fixed-dose combinations (FDC) of anti-tuberculosis drugs, the market will most probably change dramatically in the next few years. Prices should go down, but quality must remain an essential goal for managers in charge of the procurement process. General essential requirements for suppliers submitting for competitive bidding are reviewed, and in particular the WHO certification scheme. Even though the scheme does not dispense with the need to submit drugs to the quality control procedures required in the importing country, it is a very useful tool which should be encouraged in the supply process. Specific requirements for FDCs are discussed, particularly interpretation of the bioavailability tests which are compulsory for rifampicin-containing FDCs.