Does the Amount of Opioid Consumed Influence How Patients Rate Their Experience of Care After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: With legislative efforts aimed at optimizing value of care, surgeons performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are faced with increased responsibility of optimizing patient perception of care. However, pain after TKA may negatively influence patient perception of care, as measured by Press Ganey (PG) patient satisfaction surveys. While opioid-based medications are best suited for acute pain alleviation, awareness of a growing opioid epidemic has spurred efforts to reduce its administration. Therefore, this study assessed the correlation between postoperative opioid consumption and 7 PG question domains: (1) overall hospital rating; (2) communication with nurses; (3) response time of hospital staff; (4) communication with doctors; (5) hospital environment; (6) pain management and; (7) communication about medication. METHODS: We reviewed our institutional PG database for TKA patients from 2011 to 2014. A total of 406 patients were analyzed (mean age = 66, 73.4%). Opioid consumption was measured using a morphine milliequivalent conversion algorithm. Bivariate correlation analysis assessed the association between opioid consumption and PG domains. Spearman's r was utilized to assess the strength of the association. RESULTS: No association between total opioid consumption and overall hospital rating (r = 0.044), communication with doctors (r = 0.080), communication with nurses (r = 0.072), responsiveness of hospital staff (r = 0.084), pain management (r = 0.100), communication about medicines (r = 0.083), or hospital environment (r = 0.155) were found. DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that PG scores are not influenced by immediate postoperative opioid use. These results suggest opioid-based pain medications should be administered exclusively on the basis of clinical guidelines and patient needs without concern regarding satisfactions scores and reimbursement penalties.

Trends in Total Hip Arthroplasty Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: A National Database Analysis Between 2008 and 2015.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act expanded health coverage for low-earning individuals and families. With more Americans having access to care, the use of elective procedures, such as total hip arthroplasty (THA), was expected to increase. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate trends in THA before and after the initiation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act regarding race, age, body mass index, and sex between 2008 and 2015. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all individuals who had undergone primary THA between 2008 and 2015. This yielded a total of 104,209 patients. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze patient-level data. A Cochran-Armitage test assessed trends in categorical data points over time. Analysis indicated an increased percentage of blacks or African Americans undergoing THA (7.8% vs 9.2%, P<.001), followed by Native Americans or Pacific Islanders (0.0% vs 0.4%, P<.001), American Indians or Alaskan Natives (0.3% vs 0.5%, P=.016), and Asians (1.4% vs 1.5%, P=.002). An increased percentage of patients 55 to 80 years old received THAs (68.6% vs 74.1%, P<.001). The percentage of patients with a body mass index of 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2, 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m2, and 35.0 to 39.9 kg/m2 increased (32.9% vs 33.1%, 24.2% vs 25.6%, 12.6% vs 13.3%, respectively, P<.001 for all). These findings may provide insight on the changing patient characteristics for orthopedic surgeons performing THA. Furthermore, these findings may inform health policy makers interested in increasing access to procedures underutilized by specific patient populations and the creation of strategies to meet increased demand. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e534-e540.].

Articulating Spacers as a Modified One-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging complication for surgeons and patients alike. Although two-stage revision arthroplasty remains the gold standard PJI management in the United States, one-stage revision has had success in many parts of Europe. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review: 1) ultimate treatment success; 2) necessary antibiotic duration; 3) change in knee range of motion (ROM); and 4) final Knee Society Scores (KSS) in a case series of patients managed with retention of articulating antibiotic spacers following PJI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all patients treated for chronic PJI after primary TKA with retention of articulating antibiotic spacers at a minimum of one-year follow-up. Descriptive analysis was utilized to evaluate demographic characteristics, discharge destination, follow-up and antibiotic durations, Knee Society Score (KSS), and rates of treatment failure. Paired-Samples t-Tests were utilized to evaluate mean changes in flexion and extension between the preoperative and postoperative time periods. RESULTS: Our final cohort included 29 patients who were managed with articulating spacer retention at a mean follow-up of 16.8 (range, 12.0 to 23.1) months, with 21 patients (72.4%) medically unfit for multiple surgeons and eight patients (27.6%) satisfied with their function. Mean age was 61.3 (range, 41 to 85) years and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 6.1 (mean, 0 to 12). The predominant infecting organism was Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which was involved in eight patients (27.6%). There was a significant increase in postoperative knee flexion (+14.7°; p<0.001) and no decrease in postoperative knee extension (+2.3°; p=0.361). Treatment success in our cohort was 79.3% (23 patients), with four patients (13.8%) having chronic wound drainage and two patients (6.9%) requiring multiple spacer exchanges. Sixteen patients (55.2%) were able to complete their antibiotic regimen, with the remaining patients unable to discontinue their antibiotics by latest clinic follow-up. DISCUSSION: One-stage exchange arthroplasty offers the advantage of a single procedure with analogous failure rates compared to two-stage exchange, decreases hospitalization, and improves cost-effectiveness, which is paramount in today's healthcare environment. To our knowledge, this is the first study in the United States to evaluate outcome scores, function, and success rate of a modified one-stage revision TKA technique. Although we are unable to make definitive conclusions based on the small sample size, the outcomes in this study are encouraging.