ABSTRACT
The high cardiometabolic risk associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) may be linked to central fat accumulation. This study compared fat distribution between women with PCOS and controls matched by body mass index. It also sought to determine if insulin resistance (IR), androgens, or inflammatory markers correlate with body composition parameters in PCOS patients. In total, thirty-five women with PCOS and 37 controls, aged 18-40 years, were included. Hormonal/metabolic profiles, inflammatory biomarkers [tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α and interleukin-6 (IL-6)], anthropometry (waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, lipid accumulation product [LAP], visceral adiposity index [VAI]), and body composition assessed through dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were assessed. The PCOS group exhibited significantly higher androgen levels and markers of IR. However, levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were comparable between the groups. Despite having similar total body fat mass (FM), the PCOS group had excessive central fat, including increased truncal FM and visceral adipose tissue (VAT). In PCOS, androgens were not associated with body fat or its distribution. IL-6 was positively correlated with total and truncal FM, while insulinemia and the homeostatic model assessment for IR were positively associated with VAT, as well as with total and truncal FM. Although anthropometric measurements and indices were positively associated with DXA-derived central FM parameters, our data suggest that LAP is the most effective tool for assessing central fat deposition and metabolic dysfunction in the PCOS patients studied herein. Furthermore, in this population, IR, rather than androgens or proinflammatory cytokines, is more closely associated with abdominal obesity.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the demographic, clinical, social-educational determinants and diabetes management factors that have influenced the agreement between glycaemia obtained from a glucometer and logbook; the second objective was to evaluate the influence of the above-mentioned factors on glycemic control and its trajectories in Type 1 diabetes (T1D) over 1 year follow-up period during routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted at the Diabetes Unit at Rio de Janeiro's State University, between May 2017 and May 2018. All consecutive patients with clinical diagnosis of T1D that attended the Diabetes Unit between April and June 2017 were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 158 patients. Overall, for 112 (73.2%) of the patients, we found no agreement between glycaemia obtained from a glucometer and the logbook (group 2). In 41 (26.8%) of the patients there was an agreement (group 1). Patients from group 1 presented a lower mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (p = 0.03) and a tendency to have a lower baseline HbA1c (p = 0.08), they received more frequently strips for glucose monitoring from the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) (p = 0.047) and were more adherent to the prescribed diet (p = 0.01) than patients from group 2. Multivariate analysis of this agreement (as a dependent variable) showed that adherence to diet was the only significant independent variable. Significant difference was noted between baseline and final HbA1c [(9.4 ± 2.2%) vs (9.03 ± 1.8%), p = 0.017], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that the majority of T1D patients that were followed at a tertiary center did not have significant agreement between glycaemia obtained from a glucometer and a logbook. Adherence to diet was the main factor related to the agreement, but the supply of strips by SUS should also be considered in clinical practice.