Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) in renal cancer. How to manage challenging masses. A narrative review.

In the last decades, the refinements in the imaging techniques led to an increased number of detected renal tumors. If radical and partial nephrectomy remain the gold standard for the treatment of renal cancer, Radio-Frequency Ablation (RFA) has emerged as a therapeutic option for renal masses. Even if this technique is minimally-invasive, it requires a proper preoperative anatomic study and in some cases RFA treatment is technically challenging. To date, there is no standardization for studying challenging cases before treatment and to plan a safe and effective procedure when intervening organs are in the trajectory of the needle. In this study we searched the literature focusing on the challenging cases and strategy applied to manage the treatment safely and effectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MedLine and Embase via Ovid database were searched, using the following key words: Percutaneous RFA, radiofrequency, renal ablation, kidney ablation, renal thermoablation, kidney thermoablation, hydrodissection, heat sink. The difficulties found in the literature while performing the ablation procedure were grouped and a categorization of the strategies applied to perform a safe and effective procedure was proposed, in the aim to standardize the approach for treatment of challenging cases. Literature was analyzed according with selection criteria agreed by the Authors. RESULTS: The literature review showed four groups of lesions requiring an experienced approach. Group 1: Lesions close to the bowel. Group 2: Lesions close to the urinary tract. Group 3: Lesions close to intervening organs. Group 4: Lesions close to large vessels (heat-sink phenomenon). CONCLUSION: When planning a RFA treatment, a standardized approach to challenging masses is possible. This review make the treatment of these masses more systematic and safe.

Factors predicting prolonged glucocorticoid therapy in patients with adrenal insufficiency after laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Introduction and importance: Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is common after adrenalectomy for Primary Adrenal Cushing's syndrome (PACS), due to the inhibition of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis (HPAA) by the functioning adrenal mass. The treatment of post-surgical AI is based mainly on glucocorticoid supplementation therapy. To date, however, there is no known predicting factor of the duration of supplementation therapy in patients treated with laparoscopic adrenalectomy for PACS. Case presentation: We report the case of a 22-year-old Caucasian female who presented with dyspnea, osteoporosis, vertebral collapses and fractures of the pelvis. The diagnosis of ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome was provided. Abdominal MRI revealed a left adrenal mass suggestive for adrenal adenoma, highly suggestive for PACS. The patient underwent left laparoscopic adrenalectomy. After surgery, glucorticoid supplementation therapy was started. More than A-year steroid replacement therapy was necessary before the patient completely recovered the function of the HPAA. During this period the patient was strictly followed up in order to adjust pharmacologic treatment, thus allowing to investigate the possible causes of such a slow and hard recover of the contralateral adrenal gland function. Conclusion: AI is common after adrenalectomy for PACS due to HPAA suppression. The duration of steroid replacement therapy may be vary depending on patient's characteristics and may be uncommonly long, as in our case. We concluded the not only cortisol and ACTH level, but also radiological findings, such as the size of the mass, its functional activity as well as the hypotrophy or atrophy of the contralateral adrenal gland may be predictive of the duration of the steroid therapy. These factors, if correctly studied before surgery, may be of help in tailoring the postoperative management of the patients after adrenalectomy.

PSA-IgM and iXip in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer: clinical relevance and future potential. A review.

The Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) is the first filter in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Unfortunately, it is organ-specific but not cancer-specific. In addition, some prostate cancers are not clinically-significant and their diagnosis and treatment may lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. For these reasons, other markers have been proposed in the last years, such as PCA3 and PHI, but none of these are currently used in the clinical practice on large scale. In the last decade, PSA-IgM and the algorithm iXip have emerged for the diagnosis of prostate cancer and showed to perform well in decreasing the detection of clinically-insignificant prostate cancer and in reducing the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies. This review focuses on data reported in the literature on PSA-IgM and iXip as well as on the future perspectives of their usage in the clinical practice on large scale.

Oncologic outcome, side effects and comorbidity of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for localized prostate cancer. A review.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is considered one of the most important health problems. Due to the increased number of diagnosed patients and the inability to distinguish aggressive tumors, minimally-invasive procedures have become increasingly interesting. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an alternative option to radical surgery to treat prostate cancer. To date, however, data on side effects and comorbidities of this technique are still not conclusive. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed the literature to concentrate on side effects and comorbidities of HIFU treatment of prostate cancer with the following key words: hifu, high intensity focused ultrasound, ultrasonic therapy, transrectal hifu, prostate ablation, side effects, comorbidities. MedLine and Embase via Ovid database were searched. Selection criteria were: English language, articles published between 2001 and 2015, case series including at least 100 participants and reported data on side effects and comorbidities. Sixteen uncontrolled studies were identified. No randomized controlled trials (RCT) were found in the literature comparing side effects and comorbidities of HIFU to other routine approaches to prostate cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: HIFU seems to be a promising minimally-invasive treatment for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, especially for patients who are unfit for radical surgery. Prospective studies with longer follow-up periods and RCT are required to properly assess the impact of side effects and comobidities related to the HIFU technique in comparison with other therapies to treat prostate cancer.

What chance do we have to decrease prostate cancer overdiagnosis and overtreatment? A narrative review.

In the era of biochemical tests and algorithms, the management of prostate cancer from prevention to treatment is still controversial. The debate is focused on clinically-significant and clinically-insignificant prostate cancer. As it is well known, the diagnostic tools available are not able to distinguish between the two, thus leading to men treated for prostate cancer even if not strictly necessary. Unfortunately, as of today, there is no test available able to predict the clinical aggressiveness of prostate cancer at the time of the diagnosis. However, some indexes, PSA derivatives, immunocomplexes, and diagnostic methods have been proposed. If properly used in the daily clinical practice, these tools may be of support in the decision making process, in the effort to reduce the overdiagnosis and the overtreatment of prostate cancer.For this reason, we believe that a clear knowledge of this tools, indexes and diagnostic methods is of the utmost importance in preventing the morbidities related to unnecessary treatment as weel as preventing the detrimental effect of missing the diagnosis of a clinically significant prostate cancer.This reviews encompasses the most studied tests and diagnostic methods to predict the aggressiveness of prostate cancer, to avoid to miss a diagnosis of clinically significant cancers and to optimize the overall pre-treatment work-up. (www.actabiomedica.it).