"DO ONE, GET TWO": dual venous drainage of the radial forearm free flap by a single venous anastomosis.

PURPOSE: The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) remains a workhorse in microsurgical reconstruction. Its failure is primarily due to problems with venous drainage; for this reason, controversy on venous anastomosis patterns still exists. This manuscript describes our experience in using a communicating vein to overcome the complications of venous drainage of the RFFF. METHODS: Following a review of the vascular anatomy of the RFFF, we retrospectively review the use of the communicating vein and report our results, with the aim of overcoming the dichotomy "superficial versus deep venous system" and "single versus double anastomosis" and discussing the evidence of advantages in using a single microanastomosis with a communicating vein. RESULTS: Our retrospective review included a total of 123 patients in which a RFFF was performed to reconstruct intraoral defects, performed with a single venous anastomosis using the communicating vein. Four patients (3.25%) required a return to theatre for revision of the venous anastomosis and one case resulted in flap failure due to arterial insufficiency (0.81%). CONCLUSIONS: Our series highlights the constant presence of the communicating vein, although with variations of origin and course that did not preclude the possibility to correctly perform the anastomosis. Advantages of a single microanastomosis with the communicating vein include ease, speed, reliability and versatility in planning the anastomosis. Based on our results, the use of the communicating vein showed comparable and, in some cases, more favourable results when compared to venous anastomotic complications reported in the literature.

Medial femoral condyle free flap for carpo-metacarpal instability following hamate comminute fracture.

Complete reconstruction of the hamate bone has been reported in the literature mostly following cancer excision or avascular necrosis. For the exiguity of the tissue deficit, bone grafting has usually been used as treatment option for its rapidity and easiness to perform, even if a variable amount of bone resorption may occur. In traumatic cases, microbial contamination may jeopardize the success of a well performed bone graft and vascularised bone grafts may represent a better reconstructive option. Here we describe the first case reported in the literature of a patient underwent complete hamate reconstruction following trauma with an osseous medial femoral condyle free flap as vascularized arthrodesis between the capitate and the 4th MTC base, in order to stabilize the 4th and 5th finger and the ulnar carpo-metacarpal joint.

Outcomes of a Mini External Fixator System for the Treatment of Unstable Periphyseal Hand Fractures.

Background: Most unstable hand fractures in children are treated by closed methods. If osteosynthesis is required, Kirschner (K)-wires are commonly used, though they carry a risk of injury to the physis. We have been using a mini external fixator system (MEFS) for the treatment of unstable periphyseal fractures of the hand. The aim of this study is to describe the application and report the outcomes of MEFS for the treatment of periphyseal fractures of the hand. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all the patients with periphyseal fracture of the hand treated with MEFS from March 2010 to December 2019. Data with regard to age, sex, hand dominance, digit and bone injured, mechanism of injury, medical records and related radiographs were collected. Salter-Harris classification was used to classify epiphyseal fractures and the Al-Qattan classification for categorising neck fractures. Range of motion and residual deformity of the affected fingers were evaluated during follow-up and at 3 months postoperatively. Results: Fourteen periphyseal unstable fractures were treated using closed reduction and MEFS. Only one patient with a fracture of the neck of the proximal phalanx of the little finger required revision surgery. No patient had pin site infection or pin loosening and the device was well tolerated by all patients. All fractures united and all the patients recovered a full range of motion at final follow-up. Conclusions: The MEFS is a reasonable alternative for unstable periphyseal fractures with good outcomes and avoids the risk of iatrogenic physeal injury from K-wire fixation. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

The use of preauricular skin flaps in the treatment of ear malignancy in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: The ear is one of the face areas most affected by skin cancers, and the surgical reconstruction is often challenging because of tumor- and patient-related factors. Reconstructive options are essentially skin flaps and grafts or their combinations. The use of preauricular translocation (PAT) flap for auricular reconstructions is constantly increasing. AIM AND METHODS: This retrospective study reports the comparison between the PAT flap and the full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) for surgical auricular defect reconstruction in elderly population (≥65 years) that typically shows poor compliance in the postoperative wound care management. RESULTS: A total of 52 FTSGs (Group A) and 39 PAT (Group B) were performed between April 2007 and July 2020. The aim was to investigate, compare, and define advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the overall patients' satisfaction. The mean surgical and healing times were longer in Group A (p < 0.05). No complications occurred in the PAT group, and all the flaps survived. In the FTSG group, the overall complication rate was 17.3% (four partial and three total graft failure, and two graft infections). T test was used to compare the VAS scores: Patients with PAT flap were more satisfied than those with FTSG (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preauricular translocation flap is a reproducible, safe, and quick option for auricular defects reconstruction in the ≥65 years population, associated with an easier patient management, high patient satisfaction, and excellent aesthetic result.

Reconstruction of the Nose: Management of Nasal Cutaneous Defects According to Aesthetic Subunit and Defect Size. A Review.

The nose represents the most common site for the presentation of cutaneous cancer, especially in sun-exposed areas: ala, dorsum, and tip. Even the smallest loss of substance can create aesthetic and psychosocial concerns for patients; therefore, surgeons who perform nasal reconstruction should be strictly confident with the pertinent surgical anatomy in order to tailor the procedure to the patient's condition and needs. Radical tumor excision and satisfactory aesthetic and functional results are primary targets. Restoring the original shape is the goal of any reconstruction: appropriate reshaping of three-dimensional geometry, proper establishment of symmetry, and excellent color and texture match to the adjacent structures are paramount features. Multiple options exist to re-establish functional and aesthetic integrity after surgical oncology; nevertheless, the management of nasal defects can be often challenging, and the gold standard is yet to be found. The current goal is to highlight some of the more common techniques used to reconstruct cutaneous defects of the nose with a specific focus on decision making based on the aesthetic subunit and defect size. The authors attempt to share common pitfalls and offer practical suggestions that they have found helpful in their clinical experience.

Galactocele After Aesthetic Breast Augmentation with Silicone Implants: An Uncommon Presentation.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed esthetic operations. Galactorrhea and galactocele formation are both very rare complications. The real cause still remains unknown, but various risk factors have been well reported in the literature. This report concerns a case of postoperative galactocele following bilateral breast augmentation via the inframammary approach with dual-plane insertion of implants, which is usually considered a protective approach in terms of risk factors for induction of postoperative galactorrhea. METHODS: The patient had no significant surgical, gynecological or medical history, including galactorrhea or hyperprolactinemia, and did not present any chest wall abnormalities. There has been no use of oral contraceptives or any other drugs. After the surgical procedure, the patient presented with infection-like symptoms, for which galactorrhea or galactocele was initially not considered, mainly for the absence of specific risk factors. RESULTS: After antibiotic and bromocriptine therapy, her breast returned to normal, with no pain, inflammation, enlargement or esthetic alterations. After 6 months of follow-up, the patient did not present any abnormality and she was satisfied with the result. CONCLUSION: With our report, we want to underline that galactorrhea and galactocele cannot be ruled out, even in patients with no risk factors and with procedures considered as "protective." With a fast diagnosis and a specific therapy, implants and final result can be rescued. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The use of the serratus anterior muscle vascular pedicle as recipient site in DIEP flap transfer for breast reconstruction.

Currently, the choice for recipient vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction is made between axillary and internal mammary regions. The authors report their experience with anastomosis to a new, unconventional, axillary recipient vessel, the serratus anterior muscle vascular pedicle. Among 340 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions performed between 2004 and 2013, 11 were successfully revascularised to the serratus anterior (SA) pedicle: In three cases, complications led to a salvage procedure, while in eight cases, anastomosis to this recipient site was electively planned. The pedicle was constantly present, with calibre always comparable to that of flap's pedicle. At the mean 24-month follow-up, no recipient site complications were observed. The SA muscle pedicle resulted as a reliable choice in salvage procedures and a suitable option for recipient vessel selection in elective cases.