Non-invasive tests in gastric diseases.

Although the gastric cancer incidence is decreasing, this neoplasia remains one of the major causes of oncological mortality. Because of an insidious development, gastric cancer is often diagnosed in an advanced stage and consequently with a poor prognosis. Accurate non-invasive tests should be extremely useful in order to detect gastric neoplasm in an early phase. In clinical practice, there is no reliable bio-marker for detecting this malignant disease. However, intestinal as well as diffuse types of gastric cancer are preceded by gastric mucosa inflammation. Furthermore, the intestinal type of the neoplasia is, generally, related to chronic atrophic gastritis, especially if associated with intestinal metaplasia. In particular, the risk of the neoplasm is linked to both extension and severity of gastric atrophy. Serological parameters such as serum pepsinogens I (PGI) and II (PGII), gastrin-17 (G-17) cytokines (e.g. IL-8), antiparietal cells, IgG anti-Hp and CagA antibodies and lastly ghrelin supply information about either atrophic or inflammatory conditions characterising gastric mucosa. Low PGI and PGI/PGII ratio levels, especially if combined with high G-17 levels, are recognised bio-markers of corpus atrophic gastritis. Low G-17 levels could be, also, suggestive of antral atrophic gastritis. Furthermore, plasmatic ghrelin levels seem to be also a bio-marker of corpus atrophy. Anti-Hp IgG and CagA antibodies as well as PGII levels are able to detect gastric inflammation. Serological parameters could select subjects at risk for gastric mucosa alterations such as inflammation or atrophy, rather than gastric cancer itself. This review analyses the information derived from serological bio-markers as well as the involved clinical studies.

Clinical usefulness of serum pepsinogens I and II, gastrin-17 and anti-Helicobacterpylori antibodies in the management of dyspeptic patients in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Several tests have been proposed for evaluating dyspeptic symptoms and their relationship to the underlying gastric disease. Serum pepsinogens and gastrin-17 are known to be useful biomarkers for the detection of gastric pathologies. AIM: To evaluate the capability of screening dyspeptic patients in the primary care by analyses of serum pepsinogens I (sPGI) and II (sPGII), gastrin-17 (sG-17) and the IgG anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies (IgG-Hp). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-two consecutive patients with dyspeptic symptoms (208 females, mean age 50.6 +/- 16 years, range 18-88 years) referred by general practitioners for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled. A blood sample was taken from each subject for IgG-Hp, sPGI, sPGII and sG-17 analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-seven patients had a complete screening; of these, 132 resulted positive for Hp infection. Patients with atrophic chronic gastritis showed significantly lower serum pepsinogen I levels and sPGI/sPGII ratio than patients with non-atrophic chronic gastritis. Moreover, by calculating the values of sPGI by sG-17 and sG-17 by sPGII/sPGI, subjects with atrophic chronic gastritis could be distinguished from those with non-atrophic chronic gastritis and from those with normal mucosa, respectively. sG-17 levels were found to be a useful biomarker for the detection of antral atrophic gastritis, while the combination of sPGI, the sPGI/sPGII ratio and sG-17 was found effective in identifying corpus atrophy. CONCLUSION: A panel composed of PGI, PGII, G-17 and IgG-Hp could be used as a first approach in the 'test and scope' and/or 'test and treat' strategy in the primary care management of dyspeptic patients.

'Serological biopsy' in first-degree relatives of patients with gastric cancer affected by Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Relatives of patients with gastric cancer are at increased risk of developing this disease, especially if they are infected by Helicobacter pylori. Moreover, H. pylori-related atrophic gastritis and hypochlorhydria are well-documented risk factors for noncardia gastric cancer. Serum pepsinogen I (sPGI) and II (sPGII) levels are low in this condition. The aim of our study was to assess by means of a 'Gastropanel' blood test, including sPGI, sPGII, gastrin-17 (G-17) and antibodies anti-H. pylori (IgG-Hp). both functional and morphological features of gastric mucosa in Hp + ve subjects with a family history of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five Hp + ve subjects consecutively referred to our department for gastrointestinal complaints, selected as first-degree relatives of patients suffering from gastric cancer, were enrolled in the study and then matched for sex and age with 25 dyspeptic and Hp + ve subjects with no family history of gastric neoplasia. Blood samples were taken for determination of gastropanel in all patients; in addition, antibodies against CagA were analysed. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups as regards alcohol consumption, coffee intake and smoking habits. Mean sPGI levels in Group A (83.4 +/- 58.4 microg/L) were significantly lower than those in Group B (sPGI 159.5 +/- 80.6 microg/L; P < 0.0001) as well as sPGII (12.5 microg/L = 6.24 versus 20.6 +/- 58 microg/L; P < 0.006). No statistical difference was found between the two groups in relation to G-17 levels, IgG-Hp titres and antibodies against CagA. CONCLUSION: First-degree relatives of patients with noncardia gastric cancer affected by H. pylori infection present lower sPGI and sPGII levels, possibly due to the increased frequency of atrophic lesions in these patients.