Accuracy of a technology-assisted eye exam in evaluation of referable diabetic retinopathy and concomitant ocular diseases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Digital retinal imaging using store-and-forward technology is used to screen for diabetic retinopathy (DR). Its usefulness in detecting non-diabetic eye diseases is uncertain. We determined the level of agreement between teleretinal imaging supplemented with visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements (ie, technology-assisted eye (TAE) exam) and a comprehensive eye exam in evaluation for DR and non-diabetic ocular conditions. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study with two parallel evaluations. Patients with diabetes (n=317) had a TAE exam and a comprehensive eye exam on the same day. A subset of participants with normal baseline exams (n=72) had follow-up exams 1 year later. We measured the level of agreement for referable ocular findings. RESULTS: Agreement for referable ocular findings was moderate (n=389, agreement: 77%; κ: 0.55), due in part to ungradable exams (22%). However, about half of the ungradable exams had findings that warranted referral. There was substantial agreement for follow-up exams (n=72, agreement: 93%; κ: 0.63). Among all gradable exams (n=303), the TAE exam had 86% sensitivity and 84% specificity for referable ocular findings, with high agreement (≥94%) for DR and other major ocular diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: There was moderate-to-substantial agreement between a TAE exam and a comprehensive eye exam for referable ocular findings in patients with diabetes. Ungradable exams were a frequent marker of ocular pathology. Teleretinal imaging may be a useful evaluation for both diabetic and non-diabetic ocular conditions.

Teleretinal imaging for detection of referable macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity for detection of referable age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using an existing nonmydriatic telemedicine pathway for diabetic retinopathy screening with comparison to same-day face-to-face examination by a retina specialist. METHODS: Subjects in this study underwent nonmydriatic and mydriatic digital retinal imaging on the same day as stereoscopic dilated examination of the macula by a retina specialist and the level of AMD was recorded for each eye. Images were graded by two trained readers as nonreferable or referable (AREDS [Age-Related Eye Disease Study] grading of level 3 or greater). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing referral recommendations between each reader and the retina specialist ("gold standard"). RESULTS: There were 47 subjects (94 eyes) enrolled in the study. Sensitivity for nonreferable AMD with nonmydriatic imaging was 1.0 (reader 1) and 1.0 (reader 2), whereas specificity was 0.75 (reader 1) and 0.91 (reader 2). Sensitivity for referable AMD with nonmydriatic imaging was 0.84 (reader 1) and 0.88 (reader 2), whereas specificity was 0.81 (reader 1) and 0.81 (reader 2). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging had excellent sensitivity and specificity in identifying referable and nonreferable AMD using an existing validated telemedicine pathway for diabetic retinopathy screening.

Glaucoma medication adherence in veterans and influence of coexisting chronic disease.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize veterans' adherence to glaucoma medications and follow-up eye care, and to examine the influence of coexisting chronic conditions such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)/anxiety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of computerized medical records was performed for 161 veterans taking topical glaucoma medications. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated using pharmacy data. Mean follow-up ratio (FUR) was calculated using the number of days between visits. RESULTS: Among the health conditions examined, the most prevalent was hearing loss (0.34), followed by arthritis (0.29), PTSD, or other anxiety disorder (0.27), and dementia or other memory disorder (0.09). The average rates of MPR and FUR were 0.69±0.20 and 0.84±0.19, respectively.Group comparisons found that patients with hearing loss had higher MPR compared with patients without hearing loss, and patients who were white had higher FUR than African American patients. When demographic and health characteristics were examined simultaneously in multiple linear regressions, hearing loss emerged as a significant predictor of MPR, and being older was significantly related to FUR. Younger age was also associated with MPR and being white (vs. African American) or having a PTSD/other anxiety disorder was related to FUR, although these findings did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: FUR was better than MPR in a veteran population being treated for glaucoma.Hearing loss was significantly related to higher MPR, whereas being older was significantly associated with higher FUR. These characteristics should be taken into consideration in future programs to improve adherence to glaucoma care.

Macular thickness and systemic markers for diabetes in individuals with no or mild diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between diabetic risk factors and macular thickness in individuals without clinically detectable diabetic macular oedema has yet to be formally explored. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between macular thickness and diabetes control and duration. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study. All subjects underwent digital retinal imaging and Stratus OCT macular thickness scanning both eyes. Mean retinal thickness was determined for quadrants, rings, hemispheres, and for the central fovea (CFT), total fovea (TFT) and total macula (TMT). RESULTS: We evaluated 92 non-diabetic controls, 92 diabetic subjects with no diabetic retinopathy (DR) and 24 subjects with mild DR at the Veteran's Hospital in Jamaica Plain, MA. In subjects with diabetes, there was a significant negative correlation between retinal thickness and diabetes duration in all macular quadrants, rings and hemispheres, and for CFT, TFT and TMT (CFT: P = 0.0025, r = -0.28; TFT: P = 0.0062, r = -0.25; TMT: P = 0.0026, r = -0.28). There was no significant relationship between retinal thickness and HbA1c level (average of last three readings), systolic or diastolic blood pressure, or triglyceride levels. Additionally, no significant differences in retinal thickness were found between controls, subjects with no DR and subjects with mild DR. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with no or mild DR, macular and foveal thickness is significantly thinner with longer duration of disease. This may reflect neurodegenerative changes in the diabetic retina.

Teleretinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration.

Diabetes is the leading cause of adult vision loss in the United States and other industrialized countries. While the goal of preserving vision in patients with diabetes appears to be attainable, the process of achieving this goal poses a formidable challenge to health care systems. The large increase in the prevalence of diabetes presents practical and logistical challenges to providing quality care to all patients with diabetes. Given this challenge, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is increasingly using information technology as a means of improving the efficiency of its clinicians. The VHA has taken advantage of a mature computerized patient medical record system by integrating a program of digital retinal imaging with remote image interpretation (teleretinal imaging) to assist in providing eye care to the nearly 20% of VHA patients with diabetes. We describe this clinical pathway for accessing patients with diabetes in ambulatory care settings, evaluating their retinas for level of diabetic retinopathy with a teleretinal imaging system, and prioritizing their access into an eye and health care program in a timely and appropriate manner.

Racial differences in macular thickness in healthy eyes.

PURPOSE: The relationship between race and macular thickness remains unknown. This relationship may be important for early and accurate diagnosis of macular disease and glaucoma, and may also provide insight into disease mechanisms. In this study, we compared macular thickness in healthy eyes of black and white subjects using optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT). METHODS: This study used a matched, cross-sectional design. Subjects underwent OCT macular thickness map scanning in each eye, four-field, 45-degree digital retinal imaging in each eye, and blood pressure measurement. Retinal images were evaluated for absence of posterior pole disorders, including macular and optic nerve disease. Retinal thickness was evaluated in the central fovea, and in rings placed at 1, 3, and 6 mm from fixation. RESULTS: Compared with whites (n = 7), blacks (n = 7) had significantly thinner total foveal thickness (TFT, retinal thickness in the central 1 mm diameter area; OD: p < 0.03; OS: p < 0.02; OU average: p < 0.02), and thinner total macular thickness (TMT, retinal thickness in 6mm diameter area excluding central foveal thickness; OS: p < 0.02; OU average: p < 0.03). There was a trend for central foveal thickness (retinal thickness at fixation) to be thinner in blacks than whites (OD: p = 0.12; OS: p = 0.08). There was no significant difference in macular thickness between right and left eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal thickness as measured by Stratus OCT in the fovea and macula is significantly thinner in blacks compared with age-matched whites. Larger multiracial prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and to evaluate the need for race-specific normative values.

Nonmydriatic teleretinal imaging improves adherence to annual eye examinations in patients with diabetes.

We studied whether nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging with remote interpretation (teleretinal imaging) in the ambulatory care setting affected adherence to annual dilated eye examinations among patients with diabetes. We randomly assigned 448 patients to a teleretinal imaging group or a control group. We measured the number of patients who had dilated eye examinations within 12 months of group assignment and the agreement for level of diabetic retinopathy between teleretinal imaging and the eye examinations. The teleretinal imaging group (n = 223) had significantly more dilated eye examinations than the control group (n = 225). Teleretinal imaging and eye examination results showed significant correlation and moderate agreement. Cataract and smaller pupil size were significantly associated with ungradable retinal images. Two-thirds of patients with ungradable images had other ocular findings. Patients reported high satisfaction with nonmydriatic teleretinal imaging. Nonmydriatic teleretinal imaging improves diabetic retinopathy assessment rates.

Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the Joslin Vision Network (JVN) for follow-up annual retinal examination for level of diabetic retinopathy (DR). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with no or mild nonproliferative DR (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] level < or = 35) and no diabetic macular edema (DME) at dilated retinal examination 11 or more months earlier were imaged. Patients then had dilated retinal examination and color 35-mm seven standard field stereoscopic photography (ETDRS photographs) and completed a satisfaction survey. Level of DR determined from JVN images, clinical examination, and ETDRS photographs was compared. RESULTS: Two (1.9%) eyes had JVN images ungradable for level of DR. In the 102 gradable eyes (98.1%), JVN diagnosis exactly matched clinical examination for level of DR in 82 eyes (77.9%) and was within one level of DR in all eyes (100%). Three eyes (2.9%) had JVN images ungradable for DME; one of these eyes had DME by clinical examination. JVN diagnosis matched clinical examination for DME in all eyes (101) gradable by JVN. Fifty patients (96.1%) reported JVN imaging improved their understanding of eye disease, 100% were satisfied with JVN, and forty-eight (92.3%) would consider replacing dilated examination by their eye doctor with JVN imaging. CONCLUSIONS: JVN digital imaging closely matched clinical examination for level of DR and DME, would have resulted in no patients receiving less stringent follow-up, and was well accepted by patients. JVN digital imaging may be a suitable alternative for annual dilated retinal examination for determining level of DR or DME and appropriate follow-up comprehensive ophthalmic examination.

A telemedicine program for diabetic retinopathy in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center--the Joslin Vision Network Eye Health Care Model.

PURPOSE: To extend access to diabetic eye care and characterize the extent of diabetic retinopathy {DR) and other ocular findings using the Joslin Vision Network (JVN). DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. METHODS: Outpatients at the Togus VA Medical Center with diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose, or impaired glucose tolerance underwent JVN protocol imaging. Images were transmitted to the Joslin Diabetes Center for grading and recommended treatment plan. RESULTS: The study included 1,219 patients (2,437 eyes); 1,536 eyes (63.0%) had no (DR), 389 (16.0%) had mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR), 105 (4.3%) moderate NPDR, 35 (1.4%) severe NPDR, 20 (0.8%) very severe NPDR, and 21 (0.9%) had proliferative DR (PDR). Regarding diabetic macular edema (DME), 1,907 eyes (78.3%) had no DME, 34 (1.4%) had early DME, and 16 (0.7%) had clinically significant macular edema (CSME). Of all patients, 354 (29.0%) had either no DR or mild NPDR in both eyes, no evidence of DME, and no significant nondiabetic findings; 679 (55.7%) had no DR in either eye, and 229 (18.8%) had mild NPDR in the more severe eye. Of the 908 patients (74.5%) with either no DR or mild NPDR in the more severe eye, 533 (58.7%) had at least one nondiabetic ocular finding necessitating referral. Finally, 320 eyes (13.1%) were ungradable for both DR and DME and 160 (6.6%) were ungradable for DME alone. CONCLUSION: In a non-ophthalmic setting, JVN identifies the severity of DR and nondiabetic ocular conditions, permitting appropriate triage for eye care.

Use of Joslin Vision Network digital-video nonmydriatic retinal imaging to assess diabetic retinopathy in a clinical program.

PURPOSE: To incorporate a nonmydriatic, digital-video retinal imaging system into a Diabetes Outpatient Intensive Treatment Program and to evaluate the system's ability to assess diabetic retinopathy (DR), determine follow-up, and appropriately refer to retinal specialist ophthalmologists. METHODS: Fundus images were obtained according to Joslin Vision Network (JVN) protocol and evaluated by certified JVN readers. Patients with significant retinal disease underwent evaluation by retinal specialists. RESULTS: A total of 268 (51.0%) of 525 imaged patients had comprehensive eye examination by a retinal specialist owing to referable JVN-assessed clinical level of DR, nondiabetic ocular disease, ungradeable images, last eye examination >/=12 months prior, or patient request for examination. JVN diagnosis of a clinical level of DR agreed exactly with clinical findings in 388 eyes (72.5%) or within one level in 478 eyes (89.3%). JVN referral based on most severe diagnosis in either eye matched retinal specialist-recommended follow-up in 248/268 of patients (92.5%). A total of 136/525 (25.9%) of JVN patients had nondiabetic ocular abnormalities requiring referral. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended follow-up from JVN imaging compared favorably to clinical examination by a retinal specialist. Nondiabetic ocular pathology was identified. JVN assessment of DR level compares favorably to clinical practice, potentially improving access to eye care and enhancing diabetes management.