Uretero-Colonic Fistula at a Previous Colon Anastomosis Site: A Case Report.

Uretero-colonic fistulae are a rare disease resulting from pathologic connection between the ureter and colon, which can be difficult to diagnose. This case report reviews the case of an 83-year-old female with a history of ovarian cancer treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, who developed a uretero-colonic fistula at a previous colon anastomosis site, which was later diagnosed by ureteroscopy. She was treated with stent placement followed by loop colostomy and was discovered to have metastatic ovarian cancer. She received palliative care consultation and was advised to follow up as an outpatient with the oncology and urology services. Although uretero-colonic fistulae are treatable, treatment depends on patients' overall clinical picture.

Renal Abscess Drainage Using a Novel Transgastric Endoscopic Approach: A Case Report.

Renal and perinephric abscesses are rare purulent infections within or around renal parenchyma, typically treated with antibiotics or various procedural approaches depending on abscess size. In this case report, we describe the novel use of a transgastric endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided technique with placement of a stent for drainage between a renal abscess and the stomach in a patient who had failed attempted percutaneous drainage twice and where an open surgical approach was deemed inappropriate. The patient presented with a chief complaint of left flank pain, with CT revealing a ~4 x 4 cm renal abscess in the upper pole of the left kidney. Urology, Infectious Disease, and Interventional Radiology were consulted. Following two failed attempts at percutaneous drain placement, the patient elected for EUS-guided transgastric stent placement for drainage. The stent was removed by postoperative day two after significant decompression of the abscess. He was advised to follow up outpatient with Urology to confirm full renal abscess resolution.

Single-Port Robotic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is an essential component in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of penile cancer. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery may play an important role in decreasing the adverse effects and complications of lymph node dissections. We present our technique utilizing a single-port (SP) robot assisted laparoscopic bilateral ILND in a patient with pT3N2Mx penile cancer s/p partial penectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. METHODS: We present a case of a 64-year-old man who underwent a radical penectomy for previously diagnosed penile cancer. Pathology report showed invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. In accordance with NCCN guidelines, we performed a bilateral inguinal and pelvic lymph node dissection using robotic assisted SP laparoscopy with the DaVinci Single-Site platform. Our methods are detailed in this technical report. RESULTS: Total operative time was 3 hours and 38 minutes in duration with minimal blood loss (<20 mL). A 3 cm inguinal lymph node was excised and positive for malignancy without involvement of other nodes. The patient was discharged 90 minutes after recovery in PACU without narcotics and returned to normal bowel function within 6 hours. CONCLUSION: We present a successful surgical outcome of a SP robotic ILND in treating a patient with T3N2M0 penile cancer. At the time of publication, the patient is cancer-free with no palpable lymphadenopathy on exam. Utilization of the SP DaVinci system may soon become the standard of care in select cases as it is currently the least invasive approach and is associated with lower morbidity and mortality.

Recommendations for Treating Males: An Ethical Rationale for the Inclusion of Testicular Self-Examination (TSE) in a Standard of Care.

The phrase "standard of care" is primarily a legal term representing what procedure a reasonable person (i.e., health practitioner) would administer to patients across similar circumstances. One major concern for health practitioners is delivering and advocating for treatments not defined as a standard of care. While providing such treatments may meet certain ethical imperatives, doing so may unwittingly trigger medical malpractice litigation fears from practitioners. Apprehension to deviate, even slightly, from the standard of care may (seem to) put the practitioner at significant risk for litigation, which, in turn, may limit options for treatment and preventive measures recommended by the practitioner. Specific to testicular treatment, certain guidelines exist for cancer, torsion, vasectomy, and scrotal masses, among others. As it relates to screening, practitioner examination is expected for patients presenting with testicular abnormalities. Testicular self-examination (TSE) advocacy, however, is discouraged by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which may prompt a general unwillingness among health practitioners to promote the behavior. Considering the benefits TSE has beyond cancer detection, and the historical support it has received among health practitioners, it is paramount to consider the ethical implications of its official "exclusion" from preventive health and clinical care recommendations (i.e., standard of care). Since good ethics should lead practitioner patient care guidelines, not fear of increased malpractice risks, we recommend the development of a standard of care for counseling males to perform TSE.

"Off-Label" Usage of Testicular Self-Examination (TSE): Benefits Beyond Cancer Detection.

Testicular cancer (TCa) is the most common cancer among 15- to 34-year-old males. Treatments are highly effective, which help foster approximately 98% 5-year survival rate. There are very few known causal factors of the disease (e.g., cryptorchidism and family history), thus possibly limiting primary prevention methods. Secondary preventative measures, on the other hand, most notably testicular self-examination (TSE), are well-known and are promoted to help prevent late-stage diagnosis of TCa. However, debate ensues as to whether or not TSE provides any benefit. In light of a recent systematic review conducted by these authors assessing the effectiveness of TSE promotion interventions, we propose that the behavior can serve as a tool not just for detection of TCa, but other male-specific urogenital health concerns, including varicoceles, hydroceles, among others. Furthermore, we suggest that TSE can also help foster informed decision-making skills among males with regard to health concerns and treatment options. However, our advocacy is in direct conflict with U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's influential "D" rating of TSE and others who recommend against performing TSE. This article offers an overview of the dispute over TSE's purpose and net benefit. We conclude that TSE is a behavior that is beneficial beyond detecting cancer. These proposed "off-label" uses of the procedure make for an effectual means to promote testicular health, self-awareness, and wellness among males. Recommendations for future research and advocacy are presented to the academy.

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: Case Series and Literature Review.

Although originally considered to be uncommon, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is becoming increasingly visible, annually comprising an increasing portion of suspected diagnoses of acute coronary syndrome. This condition is characterized by reversible left ventricular akinesis without significant coronary artery obstruction. This case study presents five patients diagnosed with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, as confirmed by echocardiogram and angiography. All of the patients presented with classic myocardial chest pain and elevated troponins. Following diagnosis, they were treated with supportive measures, particularly angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and beta-blockers. All patients made a full recovery. Though the mechanism of Takotsubo has not been fully elucidated, hypotheses suggest it may be related to excessive catecholamine levels causing either myocardial stunning or coronary vasospasm. Recognition and understanding of this unusual pathology are essential because it can lead to improved clinical management.

Adult-acquired hidden penis in obese patients: a critical survey of the literature.

CONTEXT: Hidden penis is anatomically defined by a lack of firm attachments of the skin and dartos fascia to the underlying Buck fascia. OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise the research evidence that could support the most effective surgical techniques for adult-acquired hidden penis in obese patients. METHODS: Studies investigating patients with a diagnosis of hidden penis were identified. Of these studies, only those with adult patients classified as overweight or obese (body mass index >25) were included in the review. Three reviewers examined the abstracts of the studies identified in the initial Medline search, and abstracts considered potentially relevant underwent full-text review. Studies that included patients with congenital, iatrogenic (eg, circumcision issues or aesthetic genital surgery), or traumatic causes of hidden penis were excluded. Studies that did not define the diagnostic criteria for hidden penis were excluded to minimize the risk of definition bias. The quality of evidence for each study was determined after considering the following sources of bias: method of allocation to study groups, data analysis, presence of baseline differences between groups, objectivity of outcome, and completeness of follow-up. Using these criteria, studies were then graded as high, moderate, or low in quality. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 119 patients met the inclusion criteria. All but 1 of the studies were nonrandomized. One study provided a clear presentation of results and appropriate statistical analysis. Six studies accounted for individual-based differences, and 1 study failed to account for baseline differences altogether. Four studies addressed follow-up. One study was of high quality, 2 were of moderate quality, and 4 were of low quality. CONCLUSION: Building a clinical practice guideline for the surgical management of hidden penis has proven difficult because of a lack of high-quality, statistically significant data in the research synthesis. The authors elucidate the challenges and epitomize the collective wisdom of surgeons who have investigated this problem and emphasize the need for rigorous evaluative studies.

Interventions Promoting Testicular Self-Examination (TSE) Performance: A Systematic Review.

Testicular cancer is one of the greatest threats to health and wellness among 15- to 40-year old males. A concerted effort in the literature promoting awareness, risk factors, and preventative measures is warranted. There is limited discussion on the validity of interventions aimed at promoting testicular self-examination (TSE) performance; the existing body of evidence offers little discussion on what specific factors motivate performance. To assist in making Healthy People 2020 an all-inclusive success, a comprehensive assessment of existing evidence is necessary to assist in closing this research gap. A systematic review of interventions promoting TSE performance discovered moderate levels of effectiveness among 10 studies promoting the behavior. Concerning methodological quality, nine were of average quality and one was of high quality. In terms of significant TSE reporting between intervention and control/comparison groups, 3 out of 10 did not achieve the statistical causal threshold. Based on our assessment of TSE intervention quality and outcomes pertaining to behavior adoption, a best-practices guideline is presented for researchers in the field to consult as they design their interventions. This guideline aims to improve on internal and external validity of TSE promotion research in order to make them more effective.