Bilateral interactions in saccade programming. A saccade-latency study.

Subjects were required to make a saccade to a target appearing randomly 4 degree to the left or right of the current fixation position (1280 trials per experiment). Location cues were used to direct visual attention and start saccade preparation to one of the two locations before target onset. When the cue indicated the target location (valid trials), the generation of express saccades (visually guided saccades with latencies around 100 ms) was strongly facilitated. When the opposite location was cued (invalid trials), express saccades were abolished and replaced by a population of mainly fast-regular saccades (latencies around 150 ms). This was found with a peripheral cue independently of whether the fixation point was removed before target onset (gap condition; experiment 1) or remained on throughout the trial (overlap condition; experiment 2). The same pattern also was observed with a central cue that did not involve any visual stimulation at a peripheral location (experiment 3). In the case where the primary saccade was executed in response to the cue and the target appeared at the opposite location, continuous amplitude transition functions were observed: starting at about 60-70 ms from target onset onward, the amplitude of the cue-elicited saccades continuously decreased from 4 degree to values below 1 degree. The results are explained by a fixation-gating model, according to which the antagonism between fixation and saccade activity gives rise to multimodal distributions of saccade latencies. It is argued that allocation of visual attention and saccade preparation to one location entails a successive disengagement of the fixation system controlling saccade preparation within the hemifield to which the saccade is prepared and a partial engagement of the opposite fixation system.

Fixation and saccade control in an express-saccade maker.

In express-saccade makers a large incidence of express saccades (latencies around 100 ms) is paralleled by a reduced ability to suppress saccade generation when required. Such a behavior occurs frequently in dyslexics. We studied the latencies and the metrical properties of saccades in the very rare case of an adult, nondyslexic express-saccade maker (male, age 29 years). The subject produced 65-95% express saccades in the gap (fixation point removed 200 ms before target onset) as well as in the overlap (fixation point not removed) paradigm, which qualified the subject as the most clear case of an express-saccade maker found so far. The number of express saccades increased rather than decreased when fixation foreperiod, gap duration, and target location were randomized from trial to trial as compared to when they remained constant. In the memory-guided saccade and in the antisaccade paradigms in which immediate saccade execution to a visual target had to be suppressed, the subject often reacted to the target with express saccades in an involuntary way. The amplitudes of express saccades were--in some conditions--found to progressively decrease with increasing latency, giving rise to amplitude transition functions. The present findings disprove the notion that express saccades are generated based on the prediction of the time and location of target appearance and support the notion that they are the result of an optomotor reflex. It is argued that the operation of the reflex is gated by a separate fixation system. Express-saccade makers are described as subjects with a dysfunction of the fixation system. Recent neurophysiological findings suggest that the subject studied in the present study has a selective dysfunction of the fixation system at the level of the superior colliculus.

Presaccadic attention allocation and express saccades.

Express saccades are visually-guided saccades that are characterized by an extremely short latency of about 100 ms. The present experiments tested the hypothesis that a disengagement of visual attention is necessary for the generation of express saccades. All subjects produced large numbers of express saccades in the gap paradigm, in which the fixation stimulus is removed 200 ms before target onset (Exp. 1), but not in the overlap paradigm, in which the fixation stimulus remained on during the entire trial (Exp. 2). By means of peripheral cues (Exps. 3-5) and central cues (Exps. 6-7), visual attention was directed at the target location for the saccade before the actual appearance of the saccade target. In all experiments, the location cues facilitated rather than abolished express saccades. The generation of express saccades was facilitated even when the currently fixated visual stimulus was not removed before target onset (fixation-overlap; Exps. 5-7). The results are explained by the hypothesis that a disengagement of a separate fixation system is necessary for the generation of express saccades, a hypothesis that is in line with current neurobiological findings.