ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atrial-ventricular differences in voltage-gated Na+ currents might be exploited for atrial-selective antiarrhythmic drug action for the suppression of atrial fibrillation without risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Eleclazine (GS-6615) is a putative antiarrhythmic drug with properties similar to the prototypical atrial-selective Na+ channel blocker ranolazine that has been shown to be safe and well tolerated in patients. OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated atrial-ventricular differences in the biophysical properties and inhibition by eleclazine of voltage-gated Na+ currents. METHODS: The fast and late components of whole-cell voltage-gated Na+ currents (respectively, I Na and I NaL) were recorded at room temperature (â¼22°C) from rat isolated atrial and ventricular myocytes. RESULTS: Atrial I Na activated at command potentials â¼5.5 mV more negative and inactivated at conditioning potentials â¼7 mV more negative than ventricular I Na. There was no difference between atrial and ventricular myocytes in the eleclazine inhibition of I NaL activated by 3 nM ATX-II (IC50s â¼200 nM). Eleclazine (10 µM) inhibited I Na in atrial and ventricular myocytes in a use-dependent manner consistent with preferential activated state block. Eleclazine produced voltage-dependent instantaneous inhibition in atrial and ventricular myocytes; it caused a negative shift in voltage of half-maximal inactivation and slowed the recovery of I Na from inactivation in both cell types. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist between rat atrial and ventricular myocytes in the biophysical properties of I Na. The more negative voltage dependence of I Na activation/inactivation in atrial myocytes underlies differences between the 2 cell types in the voltage dependence of instantaneous inhibition by eleclazine. Eleclazine warrants further investigation as an atrial-selective antiarrhythmic drug.
ABSTRACT
The paralogues TRPV5 and TRPV6 belong to the vanilloid subfamily of the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of ion channels, and both play an important role in overall Ca2+ homeostasis. The functioning of the channels centers on a tightly controlled Ca2+-dependent feedback mechanism in which the direct binding of the universal Ca2+-binding protein calmodulin (CaM) to the channel's C-terminal tail is required for channel inactivation. We have investigated this interaction at the atomic level and propose that under basal cellular Ca2+ concentrations CaM is constitutively bound to the channel's C-tail via CaM C-lobe only contacts. When the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration increases charging the apo CaM N-lobe with Ca2+, the CaM:TRPV6 complex rearranges and the TRPV6 C-tail further engages the CaM N-lobe via a crucial interaction involving L707. In a cellular context, mutation of L707 significantly increased the rate of channel inactivation. Finally, we present a model for TRPV6 CaM-dependent inactivation, which involves a novel so-called "two-tail" mechanism whereby CaM bridges two TRPV6 monomers resulting in closure of the channel pore.
Subject(s)
Calcium/chemistry , Calmodulin/chemistry , Multiprotein Complexes/chemistry , TRPV Cation Channels/chemistry , Amino Acid Sequence/genetics , Animals , Binding Sites , Calcium/metabolism , Calcium Signaling/genetics , Calmodulin/metabolism , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Multiprotein Complexes/genetics , Mutation , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation , Rats , TRPV Cation Channels/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Class 1 antiarrhythmic drugs are highly effective in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation patients but carry a risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The antianginal agent ranolazine is a prototypic atrial-selective voltage-gated Na+ channel blocker but the mechanisms underlying its atrial-selective action remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the mechanisms underlying the atrial-selective action of ranolazine. METHODS: Whole-cell voltage-gated Na+ currents (INa) were recorded at room temperature (â¼22°C) from rabbit isolated left atrial and right ventricular myocytes. RESULTS: INa conductance density was â¼1.8-fold greater in atrial than in ventricular cells. Atrial INa was activated at command potentials â¼7 mV more negative and inactivated at conditioning potentials â¼11 mV more negative than ventricular INa. The onset of inactivation of INa was faster in atrial cells than in ventricular myocytes. Ranolazine (30 µM) inhibited INa in atrial and ventricular myocytes in a use-dependent manner consistent with preferential activated/inactivated state block. Ranolazine caused a significantly greater negative shift in voltage of half-maximal inactivation in atrial cells than in ventricular cells, the recovery from inactivation of INa was slowed by ranolazine to a greater extent in atrial myocytes than in ventricular cells, and ranolazine produced an instantaneous block that showed marked voltage dependence in atrial cells. CONCLUSION: Differences exist between rabbit atrial and ventricular myocytes in the biophysical properties of INa. The more negative voltage dependence of INa activation and inactivation, together with trapping of the drug in the inactivated channel, underlies an atrial-selective action of ranolazine.
