Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Sports Sci ; 28(3): 257-66, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20077274

ABSTRACT

In this study, we examined the relationship between serum creatine kinase activity following exercise-induced muscle damage and muscle fibre composition. Seventeen untrained males volunteered and underwent a .[Vdot]O2max test, Wingate test, and an exercise-induced muscle damage protocol. Muscle soreness and blood samples were recorded before, immediately after, and 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after exercise. Biopsy samples from the vastus lateralis were collected one week after exercise-induced muscle damage and were assessed for muscle fibre composition. There was no significant relationship (P > 0.05) between muscle fibre composition and creatine kinase activity. A significant positive correlation (P < 0.05) was observed between soreness 48 h after exercise and type II and IIb fibres, and a significant negative correlation (P < 0.05) was observed between soreness 48 h after exercise and type I muscle fibres. Significant positive correlations were observed between soreness 48 h after exercise and the fatigue index, relative average power, and relative anaerobic capacity. Our results suggest that creatine kinase activity following exercise-induced muscle damage may not be related to muscle fibre proportions, and higher post-exercise muscular pain may be related to a predominance of type II muscle fibres and higher anaerobic capabilities.


Subject(s)
Creatine Kinase/blood , Exercise/physiology , Muscle Fatigue/physiology , Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch/metabolism , Muscle Fibers, Slow-Twitch/metabolism , Oxygen Consumption , Adult , Anaerobiosis , Biopsy , Humans , Male , Pain/blood , Physical Exertion/physiology , Physical Fitness/physiology , Quadriceps Muscle/metabolism , Weight Lifting/physiology , Young Adult
2.
Pediatr Exerc Sci ; 21(1): 34-46, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19411709

ABSTRACT

The primary purpose of this investigation was to provide a descriptive analysis of lower-body strength and vertical jump performance in overweight male (n = 8) and female (n = 13) adolescents. Maximal strength was tested in the leg press and isometric squat. Kinetic and kinematic variables were assessed in vertical jumps at various loads. When compared with females, males demonstrated significantly greater (p < .05) absolute maximal strength in the leg press. However, when maximal strength was expressed relative to body mass, no significant difference was observed. There were no significant differences between males and females in vertical jump performance at body mass.


Subject(s)
Lower Extremity/physiology , Muscle Strength , Overweight , Adolescent , Biomechanical Phenomena , Body Mass Index , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Track and Field , Weight Lifting
3.
J Strength Cond Res ; 23(1): 106-10, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19130641

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this investigation was to compare 4 different methods of calculating volume when comparing resistance exercise protocols of varying intensities. Ten Appalachian State University students experienced in resistance exercise completed 3 different resistance exercise protocols on different days using a randomized, crossover design, with 1 week of rest between each protocol. The protocols included 1) hypertrophy: 4 sets of 10 repetitions in the squat at 75% of a 1-repetition maximum (1RM) (90-second rest periods); 2) strength: 11 sets of 3 repetitions at 90% 1RM (5-minute rest periods); and 3) power: 8 sets of 6 repetitions of jump squats at 0% 1RM (3-minute rest periods). The volume of resistance exercise completed during each protocol was determined with 4 different methods: 1) volume load (VL) (repetitions [no.] x external load [kg]); 2) maximum dynamic strength volume load (MDSVL) (repetitions [no.] x [body mass--shank mass (kg) + external load (kg)]); 3) time under tension (TUT) (eccentric time +milliseconds] + concentric time +milliseconds]); and 4) total work (TW) (force [N] x displacement [m]). The volumes differed significantly (p , 0.05) between hypertrophy and strength in comparison with the power protocol when VL and MDSVL were used to determine the volume of resistance exercise completed. Furthermore, significant differences in TUT existed between all 3 resistance exercise protocols. The TW calculated was not significantly different between the 3 protocols. These data imply that each method examined results in substantially different values when comparing various resistance exercise protocols involving different levels of intensity.


Subject(s)
Muscle Strength/physiology , Resistance Training/methods , Weight Lifting/physiology , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Anthropometry , Cross-Over Studies , Exercise Tolerance , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Physical Endurance , Probability , Reference Values , Young Adult
4.
J Strength Cond Res ; 22(1): 95-102, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18296961

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this investigation was to compare trunk muscle activity during stability ball and free weight exercises. Nine resistance-trained men participated in one testing session in which squats (SQ) and deadlifts (DL) were completed with loads of approximately 50, 70, 90, and 100% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). Isometric contractions during 3 stability ball exercises (quadruped (QP), pelvic thrust (PT), ball back extension (BE)) were also completed. During all exercises, average integrated electromyography (IEMG) from the rectus abdominus (RA), external oblique (EO), longissimus (L1) and multifidus (L5) was collected and analyzed. Results demonstrate that when expressed relative to 100% DL 1RM, muscle activity was 19.5 +/- 14.8% for L1 and 30.2 +/- 19.3% for L5 during QP, 31.4 +/- 13.4% for L1 and 37.6 +/- 12.4% for L5 during PT, and 44.2 +/- 22.8% for L1 and 45.5 +/- 21.6% for L5 during BE. IEMG of L1 during SQ and DL at 90 and 100% 1RM, and relative muscle activity of L5 during SQ and DL at 100% 1RM was significantly greater (P < or = 0.05) than in the stability ball exercises. Furthermore, relative muscle activity of L1 during DL at 50 and 70% 1RM was significantly greater than in QP and PT. No significant differences were observed in RA and EO during any of the exercises. In conclusion, activity of the trunk muscles during SQs and DLs is greater or equal to that which is produced during the stability ball exercises. It appears that stability ball exercises may not provide a sufficient stimulus for increasing muscular strength or hypertrophy; consequently, the role of stability ball exercises in strength and conditioning programs is questioned. SQs and DLs are recommended for increasing strength and hypertrophy of the back extensors.


Subject(s)
Muscle Strength/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Physical Education and Training/methods , Weight Lifting/physiology , Abdominal Muscles/physiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Electromyography , Humans , Isometric Contraction/physiology , Kinetics , Male , Pectoralis Muscles/physiology , Recruitment, Neurophysiological , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 101(1): 115-23, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17530275

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare mechanical efficiency between repeated static jumps (SJ), countermovement jumps (CMJ), drop jumps from 75% of maximum CMJ jump height (75DJ) and drop jumps from 125% of maximum CMJ height (125DJ). Subjects included eight jump-trained males. All subjects completed 30 continuous repetitions in the SJ, CMJ, 75DJ, and 125DJ. Oxygen consumption, peak force and center of mass displacement for each repetition during the four jumping patterns were measured. ME was calculated from a combination of force-time curves, displacement-time curves and lactate-corrected oxygen consumption values. In addition, muscle activity was recorded from the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis and biceps femoris using surface electromyography (EMG). 125DJ and 75DJ resulted in significantly (P < or = 0.05) greater ME in comparison to CMJ and SJ. CMJ resulted in significantly greater ME in comparison to SJ. In addition, braking phase muscle activity was significantly greater in 125DJ and 75DJ in comparison to CMJ. Negative work was significantly different between 125DJ, 75DJ and CMJ (125DJ > 75DJ > CMJ). There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.68) between ME and negative work performed across 125DJ, 75DJ and CMJ. These findings suggest that stretch-shortening cycle movements, which include a strenuous braking phase combined with simultaneous high muscle activity, increase ME. This may be due to optimal muscle-tendon unit kinetics and usage of stored elastic energy.


Subject(s)
Energy Metabolism/physiology , Energy Transfer/physiology , Movement/physiology , Muscle Strength/physiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Elasticity , Electromyography , Exercise/physiology , Exercise Test , Humans , Isometric Contraction/physiology , Isotonic Contraction/physiology , Kinetics , Leg/physiology , Male , Muscle Stretching Exercises , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Restraint, Physical , Tendons/physiology , Time Factors , Time and Motion Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...