PA Scholars: What Drives and Inhibits Success?

PURPOSE: The full expression of an educator includes scholarship, yet many physician assistant (PA) educators are not published. Several barriers unique to PA education are often cited to explain this phenomenon. However, some in the PA profession have become prolific writers despite working in the same environment. In this study, authors strove to understand what motivated these productive faculty by posing 2 research questions: (1) What are the drivers of success for high-performing PA scholars and (2) how do high performing PA scholars overcome barriers? METHODS: A qualitative study using a constructivist, grounded theory approach explored the experiences and motivation of PA-credentialed educators who published >5 peer-reviewed articles and whose body of work achieved an h-index of >3. RESULTS: High-performing scholars valued scholarship as a creative outlet and a rewarding pursuit. Scholars achieved a sense of fulfillment in their work. Research and writing were described as protective against burnout. Participants viewed barriers differently than other educators. Barriers were acknowledged, but participants developed strategies to overcome obstacles. Mentorship was seen as crucial to success. A nuanced understanding of PA research and the characteristics associated with high-performing PA scholars emerged. The study identified developmental stages associated with the formation of a scholar. CONCLUSION: Progression from prescholar to mature scholar has important implications for initiatives designed to increase scholarship and provides evidence to support the claim that scholarship positively affects job satisfaction, personal well-being, and talent retention.

Physician Assistant Faculty Perceptions Regarding Ongoing Self-assessment and Accreditation.

PURPOSE: While the processes of ongoing self-assessment and accreditation provide significant benefits to physician assistant (PA) programs, faculty members are often challenged by the required procedures and standards set by accreditation agencies. This study explored faculty perspectives regarding the processes of ongoing self-assessment and accreditation in PA programs. METHODS: A qualitative research design centered around semistructured interviews was used. A total of 26 participants were recruited, including PA program directors, associate program directors, directors of assessment and accreditation, past Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant commissioners, accreditation consultants, deans, and PA Education Association leaders. DATA COLLECTION: Semistructured one-on-one interviews were conducted by 8 members of the research team through Zoom video conferencing. Data were collected until saturation was reached. DATA ANALYSIS: The interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed independently by 3 researchers. The transcripts were imported into NVivo, a qualitative data analysis software, for coding and inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Six emergent themes were identified under 2 major categories: facilitators and challenges. Facilitators for conducting continuous programmatic review and analysis include it takes a village, internal and external support, and sustained faculty development, whereas challenges are lack of knowledge and time, unclear expectations, and inflexibility. CONCLUSION: The study highlights factors associated with facilitating the ongoing self-assessment process. However, a number of challenges were also identified. The study suggests opportunities for intervention at the program, institution, and profession level.

Characteristics of Hybrid Learning Among Health Professions Programs: A Mixed-Methods Study.

PURPOSE: To characterize current trends in hybrid education within the physician assistant (PA) profession, specifically program design, drivers, and outcomes in comparison with physical therapy hybrid education. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study involving secondary data analysis and focused interviews with stakeholders to triangulate the data. RESULTS: Compared with traditional PA programs, hybrid programs have similar admission requirements, higher cost of tuition, larger class size, and higher attrition rate than national mean. Physician Assistant National Certifying Exam outcome data are in line or slightly lower than national scores. Technological advancements and need for faculty/learner flexibility by time and location are frequently cited driving forces. CONCLUSIONS: There is a growing trend toward hybrid education among health professions. Other than cost, attrition rate, and immersion experiences, characteristics of hybrids are similar to traditional programs. It is relevant for PA educators to understand how this educational design may shape the future of PA graduates. Long-term impact should be evaluated with future studies.

Thinking Outside the Box: Advancing Clinical Education in an Era of Preceptor Shortage.

ABSTRACT: The expansion of health professions educational programs has led to an acute shortage of available clinical training sites. Rapid growth in the number of medical schools, physician assistant (PA) programs, and advanced nurse practitioner (APRN) programs, all of which share a need for similar types of clinical training experiences, has increased competition for clinical training sites and placed new challenges on educational institutions. Solutions are urgently needed to increase the quantity and quality of supervised clinical practice experiences as well as to ensure diversity among preceptors and geographical clinical sites. This article identifies key barriers to securing sufficient clinical training sites, notes emerging trends, and presents potential innovations through stakeholder collaboration for enhancing clinical training across health professions.

Whither the PA doctorate?

ABSTRACT: New perspectives have been brought to bear in the discussion of the topic of the physician associate/assistant (PA) doctoral degree in general and the entry-level PA doctorate in particular. Both the Physician Assistant Education Association (PAEA) and the American Academy of Physician Associates (AAPA) have sought and supported formal research investigations into the question. Evidence from studies shows that perceived benefits and risks are strongly influenced by the lens of the various stakeholders; that most PAs believe that the master's degree is enough for clinical practice; and that most clinical PAs and PA students are not in favor of an entry-level doctorate. Lessons learned from other healthcare professions that have transitioned to a clinical doctorate only marginally serve as a model for the PA profession. PA organizations need to fully own and embrace the task of leading the discussion and reaching a definitive conclusion in the determination of PA doctoral education. Failure of the PA profession to act decisively on the doctoral degree question would essentially default this decision to colleges and universities, which tend to have a vested economic interest in new types of degrees.

Accreditation in the Health Professions: Implications for Physician Assistant Education.

ABSTRACT: The accreditation process of health professions educational (HPE) programs is an essential ingredient in preparing a qualified healthcare workforce. Accreditation ensures that minimum standards are met by educational programs and contributes to pedagogical integrity, consistency, and academic policies and practices, leading to the desired quality of graduate outcomes. In this study, we analyzed key characteristics, policies, and practices for accreditation in 5 health professions to highlight emerging trends and discern implications for the physician assistant (PA) profession. There is growing evidence of movement toward outcome-based accreditation versus process-oriented accreditation and collaborative engagements between programs and the accreditors. Agencies are providing online discussion platforms and direct mentorship and, at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, offered virtual site visits. At an institution level, we observed a trend towards structured faculty development on accreditation, implementation of technology infrastructure for data collection, visualization and analysis, and the use of consultants for outsourcing certain elements of the accreditation process. There is a wide spectrum of approaches, from prescriptive to liberal, by the various accrediting agencies in enforcing compliance. A balance is desirable for the institutional-accreditor relationship to work effectively.

Physician assistant/associate retirement intent: seeking the exit ramp.

BACKGROUND: Retirement patterns for American physician assistants/associates (PAs) are in flux as the first substantial cadre trained in the 1970s makes their retirement choices. The growing and aging of the US population is increasing the demand for healthcare services. At the same time, provider retirement can decrease patient access to care, disrupt continuity of care and lead to poorer health outcomes. Knowing PA intentions to retire and the retirement patterns can be useful to health system employers and workforce policymakers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the retirement patterns of PAs within the United States. We investigated their characteristics, career roles, and intent to depart from clinical practice. METHODS: Drawing on the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants (NCCPA) 2020 health workforce data (N = 105,699), the associations of demographics (age, gender, US region, and years certified), and practice attributes (specialty and practice setting) of clinically active PAs were assessed with intending to retire in the next five years. Analyses for this national cross-sectional study included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and Fisher's Exact test, as appropriate. A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant for all analyses where a comparison was made. RESULTS: Overall, 5.8% of respondents indicated that they intend to retire within five years. We detected significant differences (all p < 0.001) on intentions to retire by age group, gender, US region, years certified, specialty, and practice setting. Respondents 70 years and older compared to those 60-69 were more likely (66.5% vs. 48.9%), males compared to females (8.8% vs. 4.4%), those who have been certified for more than 21 years compared to 11-20 years (25.6% vs. 4.0%), PAs practicing in family medicine compared to dermatology (7.7% vs. 3.4%) and those in the federal government practice setting compared to rural health clinic (13.6% vs. 9.8%) reported they were more likely to retire in the next five years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a comprehensive snapshot of PA retirement intentions using a robust national dataset. Among the most important factors associated with intent to retire in this study were older age and duration of PA career. Most PAs are remaining clinically active into their seventh decade-suggesting that they are integrated into medical systems that value them and they, in turn, value their role.

Physician Associates/Assistants in Primary Care: Policy and Value.

Since the new century, primary care physician supply has worsened. Analysts predict that health service demand in the United States will grow faster than physician supply. One strategy is the utilization of physician assistants/associates (PAs). Most PAs work full-time, and approximately one quarter are employed in family medicine/general medicine. PAs deliver primary care services in a team-oriented fashion in a wide variety of settings, including private health systems and community health centers. One fifth work in rural and medically underserved areas. Together PAs and nurse practitioners provide approximately one third of the medical services in family medicine, urgent care, and emergency medicine.

Developing and evaluating an instrument to assess perceptions of an entry-level physician associate doctoral degree.

BACKGROUND: Most health professions in the United States have adopted clinical or practice doctorates, sparking an ongoing debate on whether physician assistants/associates (PAs) should transition from a master's to a doctorate as the terminal degree for the profession. Although more studies are anticipated, there is no validated instrument assessing perceptions of various stakeholders regarding an entry-level PA doctoral degree. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel self-report measure to assess perceptions of an entry-level PA doctoral degree. METHODS: A multifaceted, mixed-methods approach was adopted. Based on a comprehensive literature review of the doctoral transition experiences in other health professions, an initial version of perceptions of an entry-level terminal PA doctoral degree scale (PEDDS) was generated. This scale was pilot tested with a group of PA faculty, students, and clinicians. Then, a cross-sectional survey consisting of 67 items was conducted with a national random sample of practicing PAs and PA students. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted to ensure the validity of PEDDS. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to reduce the number of items and reveal the underlying structure of PEDDS. RESULTS: The PCA confirmed 10 factors of PEDDS consisting of 53 items as the best-fit factor structure with adequate internal consistency of subscales. Those factors include a) expected positive impact on the PA profession, b) expected impact on prerequisites, (c) expected impact on the student preparedness as PA faculty and educators, (d) expected impact on the student preparedness as clinicians, (e) expected impact on accreditation and certification, (f) expected impact on curriculum, (g) expected impact on PA educators, (h) expected positive impact on diversity, (i) expected negative impact on the PA profession, and (j) expected impact on the student competency. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights the need to develop valid and reliable measurements to assess perceptions regarding the transition to the entry-level doctorate across health professions. This study could be used to guide further discussion of the entry-level doctorates for PAs and other health professions by bridging the gap of existing literature related to valid, reliable, and standardized measures on this topic.

American health workforce policy and PAs: A brief history.

ABSTRACT: Health workforce policy in the United States from the mid-1970s has been strongly influenced by perceptions of the adequacy of the physician supply and its relationship to physician assistants/associates (PAs) and NPs. During the 1980s, a series of inaccurate reports by the federal government mistakenly warned of an impending physician surplus and shaped policy decisions for decades. In spite of perceptions of a physician surplus, the PA profession expanded rapidly in the 1990s. Projections of the adequacy of the physician supply changed to a shortage in the first decade of this century and the PA component of the healthcare workforce continued to expand. During the past decade, the Association of American Medical Colleges has employed microsimulation modeling expertise to project the extent of physician shortages, an effort that initially failed to incorporate the contributions of PAs and NPs in the workforce. Although current projection models include the contributions of PAs and NPs, the substitution ratios used are notably low. Specifically, PA and NP productivity effort was set roughly at one-quarter to one-half that of the physician. PAs and NPs make up a substantial contingent within the US healthcare workforce and should be included fully in future workforce projection estimates. This article provides policy recommendations for the advancement of PA contributions to the delivery of medical care.

The PA profession in the 1990s.

ABSTRACT: History is rarely linear, and nowhere is this more evident than the US physician assistant/associate (PA) movement (1965-2021). The 1990s stand out as pivotal years for the PA profession, marked by advances that shaped the profession, experiments in primary care delivery, sex equity, the Balanced Budget Act, and national policy errors in predicting a physician surplus. Rapid growth followed program expansion, doubling from 57 in 1993 to 120 by 1999. By the end of the decade, all states had advanced PA-enabling legislation with broad-based prescribing. During this era, PA-focused research moved from descriptive to predictive, an official journal emerged in 1988, the Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant became independent, and the American Academy of Physician Associates helped shape federal health policy. Also during this period, the profile of PAs shifted from older males to younger females with important sociological implications in leadership and career development. Notable milestones included national recognition of PAs as Medicare-eligible providers, direct commissioning in the military, and employment surges in the Veterans Health Administration and US Public Health Service. Not least of all this was a time of role shifts toward specialized medicine and surgery.

Assessing demand for doctoral-prepared PA faculty: a five-year longitudinal study.

PURPOSE: Many health profession programs have transitioned to doctoral credentials. While a master's degree is the terminal degree for the physician assistant (PA) profession, there is increasing discussion regarding the doctoral degree as the PA terminal credential in US higher education.This study examines trends, demand and economic opportunities for doctoral prepared PA faculty; specifically, assessing to what extent PA faculty employers prefer doctoral credentials. METHODOLOGY: This longitudinal retrospective observational study assessed commonly required/preferred academic credentials in PA faculty job postings. Data from 2014 to 2020 was obtained from the labor analytics firm Burning Glass Technologies (BGT) and other academic job search engines. Data on current PA faculty and program directors were obtained from Physician Assistant Education Association (PAEA) survey reports. Wage gap analysis was performed to gain additional insight for the supply and demand of PA educators with a doctoral degree. RESULTS: Of the 612 unique job ads posted from 232 PA programs between 2014 and 2020, approximately 38.9% (238) stated a preference or requirement for a doctoral degree. Nearly half of the postings for program directors and leadership positions preferred candidates with doctorates. There was a correlation between tenure eligibility positions (20.1%) and preference/requirement for doctoral credentials. PAEA survey data (2014-2019) revealed approximately 24% PA faculty and 45-48% of program directors held a doctoral degree with Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) as the most frequently held doctorate. No significant difference existed in wages for faculty with or without doctoral degree. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a national sample of PA program job ads, there is a preference for doctoral-prepared PA educators and the demand for these candidates is greater than market supply. Our analysis has implications for individual faculty career planning, employers and the PA profession as it debates transition to a terminal doctoral credential. Further studies should assess the impact of doctoral credentials on PA education by examining measurable outcomes.

Forecasting the physician assistant/associate workforce: 2020-2035.

Background: Physician assistant/associates (PAs) are healthcare professionals whose roles expand universal access across many nations. PAs fill medical provider supply and demand gaps. Our paper reports a forecasting project to predict the likely census of PAs in the medical workforce spanning from 2020 to 2035. Methods: Microsimulation modelling of the American PA workforce was performed using the number of clinically active PAs employed in 2020 as the baseline. Graduation rates and PA programme expansion were parameters used to predict annual growth; attrition estimates balanced the equation. Two models, one based on data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and another based on National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants (NCCPA) data were used to estimate future annual PA census numbers. Results: As of 2020, the BLS estimated 125,280 PAs were in the medical workforce; the NCCPA estimate was 148,560 PAs in active practice. The BLS model predicted approximately 204,243 clinically active PAs by 2035; the NCCPA-based model predicted 214,248 PAs in clinical practice. Conclusions: A PA predictive model based on four data sources projects that the 2035 census of clinically active PAs to be between 204,000 and 214,000: a growth rate of approximately 35%.