Guidance for biostatisticians on their essential contributions to clinical and translational research protocol review.

Rigorous scientific review of research protocols is critical to making funding decisions, and to the protection of both human and non-human research participants. Given the increasing complexity of research designs and data analysis methods, quantitative experts, such as biostatisticians, play an essential role in evaluating the rigor and reproducibility of proposed methods. However, there is a common misconception that a statistician's input is relevant only to sample size/power and statistical analysis sections of a protocol. The comprehensive nature of a biostatistical review coupled with limited guidance on key components of protocol review motived this work. Members of the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design Special Interest Group of the Association for Clinical and Translational Science used a consensus approach to identify the elements of research protocols that a biostatistician should consider in a review, and provide specific guidance on how each element should be reviewed. We present the resulting review framework as an educational tool and guideline for biostatisticians navigating review boards and panels. We briefly describe the approach to developing the framework, and we provide a comprehensive checklist and guidance on review of each protocol element. We posit that the biostatistical reviewer, through their breadth of engagement across multiple disciplines and experience with a range of research designs, can and should contribute significantly beyond review of the statistical analysis plan and sample size justification. Through careful scientific review, we hope to prevent excess resource expenditure and risk to humans and animals on poorly planned studies.

Long-term Persistence of Allosensitization After Islet Allograft Failure.

BACKGROUND: Allosensitization has been reported after discontinuation of immunosuppression following graft failure in islet transplantation (ITx) recipients, though duration of its persistence is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated 35 patients with type 1 diabetes who received ITx, including 17 who developed graft failure (ITx alone, n = 13; ITx plus bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cells, n = 4) and 18 with persistent graft function. Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) was measured yearly for the duration of graft function within 1 y after graft failure at enrollment and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: In ITx alone graft failure patients, 61% (8/13) were PRA-positive at 6 y postgraft failure, and 46% (6/13) developed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA to 2 ± 1 donors) during follow-up. The degree of sensitization was variable (cPRA ranging between 22% and 100% after graft failure). Allosensitization persisted for 7-15 y. Three subjects (3/13) were not allosensitized. In ITx plus bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cell recipients, cPRA-positivity (88%-98%) and DSA positivity persisted for 15 y in 75% (3/4) of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Allosensitization was minimal while subjects remained on immunosuppression, but after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy, the majority of subjects (77%) became allosensitized with persistence of PRA positivity for up to 15 y. Persistence of allosensitization in this patient population is of clinical importance as it may result in longer transplant waiting list times for identification of a suitable donor in the case of requiring a subsequent transplant.

Methods for training collaborative biostatisticians.

The emphasis on team science in clinical and translational research increases the importance of collaborative biostatisticians (CBs) in healthcare. Adequate training and development of CBs ensure appropriate conduct of robust and meaningful research and, therefore, should be considered as a high-priority focus for biostatistics groups. Comprehensive training enhances clinical and translational research by facilitating more productive and efficient collaborations. While many graduate programs in Biostatistics and Epidemiology include training in research collaboration, it is often limited in scope and duration. Therefore, additional training is often required once a CB is hired into a full-time position. This article presents a comprehensive CB training strategy that can be adapted to any collaborative biostatistics group. This strategy follows a roadmap of the biostatistics collaboration process, which is also presented. A TIE approach (Teach the necessary skills, monitor the Implementation of these skills, and Evaluate the proficiency of these skills) was developed to support the adoption of key principles. The training strategy also incorporates a "train the trainer" approach to enable CBs who have successfully completed training to train new staff or faculty.

Combined treatment of intrapancreatic autologous bone marrow stem cells and hyperbaric oxygen in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The objective of this study was to determine whether the combination therapy of intrapancreatic autologous stem cell infusion (ASC) and hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBO) before and after ASC can improve islet function and metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This prospective phase 1 study enrolled 25 patients with T2DM who received a combination therapy of intrapancreatic ASC and peri-infusion HBO between March 2004 and October 2006 at Stem Cells Argentina Medical Center Buenos Aires, Argentina. Clinical variables (body mass index, oral hypoglycemic drugs, insulin requirement) and metabolic variables (fasting plasma glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, and calculation of C-peptide/glucose ratio) were assessed over quartile periods starting at baseline and up to 1 year follow-up after intervention. Means were calculated in each quartile period and compared to baseline. Seventeen male and eight female patients were enrolled. Baseline variables expressed as means +/- SEs were: age 55 +/- 2.14 years, diabetes duration 13.2 +/- 1.62 years, insulin dose 34.8 +/- 2.96 U/day, and BMI 27.11 +/- 0.51. All metabolic variables showed significant improvement when comparing baseline to 12 months follow-up, respectively: fasting glucose 205.6 +/- 5.9 versus 105.2 +/- 14.2 mg/dl, HbAlc 8.8 +/- 0.2 versus 6.0 +/- 0.4%, fasting C-peptide 1.5 +/- 0.2 versus 3.3 +/- 0.3 ng/ml, C-peptide/glucose ratio 0.7 +/- 0.2 versus 3.5 +/- 0.3, and insulin requirements 34.8 +/- 2.9 versus 2.5 +/- 6.7 U/day. BMI remained constant over the 1-year follow-up. Combined therapy of intrapancreatic ASC infusion and HBO can improve metabolic control and reduce insulin requirements in patients with T2DM. Further randomized controlled clinical trials will be required to confirm these findings.