Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Climacteric ; 24(6): 605-611, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33942698

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is prevalent in postmenopausal women. To manage UI, it necessary to improve UI screening. We aimed to analyze and understand the experience of women with UI. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with postmenopausal women (age >50 years), who were recruited from an urban general practice office. The data of the patients were analyzed using the grounded theory method to allow the conceptualization of categories to emerge. RESULTS: Data saturation was reached after eight interviews and was confirmed by two additional interviews. There were four conceptualizing categories: UI is a marker of temporality in women and of societal temporality; women's information about UI is a prerequisite for screening, and the media and information providers have an impact on women's UI experience; UI has a strong societal taboo for women (women consider UI a minor but pejorative disease and fear stigmatization); and faced with the complexity of implementing personalized screening, women recommend systematic screening by their general practitioner or gynecologist to trivialize UI and optimize its management. CONCLUSIONS: Women were uninformed about UI. They requested that the provision of information on the female anatomy should be started in childhood.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Urinary Incontinence , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis
2.
Prog Urol ; 27(8-9): 497-505, 2017.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28549730

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety anatomic results, satisfaction patient and to report short-term results of a new surgical approach for a combined treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) of anterior and medium compartments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A longitudinal case series of 83 consecutive patients operated between January 2012 and April 2014 in four tertiary centers by 8 surgeons. Potential complications have been reported. The satisfaction of patients was conducted at 6 weeks post-procedure. The anatomical evaluation was conducted at 6 weeks and 6 months post-procedure. Anatomic success was defined as prolapse stage<1 (POPQ) for both anterior and apical compartment. RESULTS: Mean age was 69.2±8.6 years. There were two intraoperative complications: a bladder injury and an ureteral injury. Postoperative complications were 14/83 (16.8%) transient urinary retentions. Seventy-three patients out of 83 (87.9%) were available for anatomic evaluation at 6 months. Anatomical success at 6 months for both anterior and apical compartments was 68/73 (93.1%). Patient satisfaction rate at 6 months was 79/83 (95.1%). Four subjects/73 (5.5%) experienced mesh exposure treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: In the current series, uterovaginal suspension anterior using a mesh Nuvia® was associated with correct anatomical results and a good satisfaction of patients. This technique seems reproducible and associated with few complications. Prospective, comparative and long-term data are required to confirm these results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Quality of Life , Surgical Mesh , Aged , Cohort Studies , Feasibility Studies , Female , France , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Hospitals, University , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urologic Surgical Procedures , Uterus , Vagina
3.
Prog Urol ; 26 Suppl 1: S73-88, 2016 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27595628

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Provide guidelines for clinical practice concerning hysterectomy during surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolaps, with or without mesh. METHODS: Systematically review of the literature concerning anatomical and functionnal results of uterine conservation or hysterectomie during surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolaps. RESULTS: Sacrospinous hysteropexy is as effective as vaginal hysterectomy and repair in retrospective comparative studies and in a meta-analysis with reduced operating time, blood loss and recovery time (NP2). However, in a single RCT there was a higher recurrence rate associated with sacrospinous hysteropexy compared with vaginal hysterectomy. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with mesh augmentation of the anterior compartment was as effective as hysterectomy and mesh augmentation (NP2), with no significant difference in the rate of mesh exposure between the groups (NP3). Sacral hysteropexy is as effective as sacral colpopexy and hysterectomy in anatomical outcomes; however, the sacral colpopexy and hysterectomy were associated with increase operating time and blood loss (NP1). Performing hysterectomy at sacral colpopexy was associated with a higher risk of mesh exposure compared with sacral colpopexy without hysterectomy (NP3). There is no sufficient data in the literature to affirm that the uterine conservation improve sexual function (NP3). CONCLUSION: While uterine preservation is a viable option for the surgical management of uterine prolapse the evidence on safety and efficacy is currently lacking. © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/standards , Hysterectomy , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Uterus/anatomy & histology , Uterus/surgery , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Surgical Mesh , Treatment Outcome
4.
Prog Urol ; 26 Suppl 1: S8-S26, 2016 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27595629

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The issue addressed in this chapter of recommendations is: What is the clinical and para-clinical assessment to achieve in women with genital prolapse and for whom surgical treatment has been decided. What are the clinical elements of the examination that must be taken into account as a risk factor of failure or relapse after surgery, in order to anticipate and evaluate possible surgical difficulties, and to move towards a preferred surgical technique? MATERIAL AND METHODS: This work is based on a systematic review of the literature (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Database of Systemactic Reviews, EMBASE) for meta-analyzes, randomized trials, registries, literature reviews, controlled studies and major not controlled studies, published on the subject. Its implementation has followed the methodology of the HAS on the recommendations for clinical practice, with a scientific argument (with the level of evidence, NP) and a recommendation grade (A, B, C, and professional agreement [AP]). RESULTS: It suits first of all to describe prolapse, by clinical examination, helped, if needed, by a supplement of imagery if clinical examination data are insufficient or in case of discrepancy between the functional signs and clinical anomalies found, or in case of doubt in associated pathology. It suits to look relapse risk factors (high grade prolapse) and postoperative complications risk factors (risk factors for prothetic exposure, surgical approach difficulties, pelvic pain syndrome with hypersensitivity) to inform the patient and guide the therapeutic choice. Urinary functional disorders associated with prolapse (urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, dysuria, urinary tract infection, upper urinary tract impact) will be search and evaluated by interview and clinical examination and by a flowmeter with measurement of the post voiding residue, a urinalysis, and renal-bladder ultrasound. In the presence of voiding disorders, it is appropriate to do their clinical and urodynamic evaluation. In the absence of any spontaneous or hidden urinary sign, there is so far no reason to recommend systematically urodynamic assessment. Anorectal symptoms associated with prolapse (irritable bowel syndrome, obstruction of defecation, fecal incontinence) should be search and evaluated. Before prolapse surgery, it is essential not to ignore gynecologic pathology. CONCLUSION: Before proposing a surgical cure of genital prolapse of women, it suits to achieve a clinical and paraclinical assessment to describe prolapse (anatomical structures involved, grade), to look for recurrence, difficulties approach and postoperative complications risk factors, and to appreciate the impact or the symptoms associated with prolapse (urinary, anorectal, gynecological, pelvic-perineal pain) to guide their evaluation and their treatment. © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.


Subject(s)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse/diagnosis , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preoperative Care/standards , Female , Humans , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/physiopathology , Urodynamics
5.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 44(6): 532-40, 2015 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25200347

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Female fertility preservation in the context of cancer management is crucial for patient's health care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncofertility practice at our university hospital of Montpellier since 2011. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The evaluation of management of young patients referred to Montpellier University Hospital from September 2011 to September 2013 for oncofertility counselling before cancer treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were referred to a specialized oncofertility center. Forty-two patients (59.1%) were included in the oncofertility program. Twenty-two patients (31%) were proposed for oocyte vitrification after COS protocol, eight patients (11.3%) for ovarian tissue cryoconservation, seven patients (9.9%) for GnRH injections, three patients (4.2%) ovarian transposition and two patients (2.8%) for embryo cryopreservation. Among the 42 indications of fertility preservation, only 18 will have finally taken place. CONCLUSION: Oncofertility counselling for young patients should now be part of the cancer management. It involves multidisciplinary teams. Further information of both oncologists and patients is needed to improve this new approach in the field of cancer treatments.


Subject(s)
Disease Management , Fertility Preservation/methods , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Fertility Preservation/statistics & numerical data , France , Humans , Program Evaluation , Young Adult
6.
Int Urogynecol J ; 24(8): 1385-90, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23306772

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our purpose was to verify whether extensive dissection toward the sacrospinous ligament (SSL) needed for mesh fixation during anterior compartment repair increases the risk of postoperative voiding difficulties. METHODS: A total of 124 patients after anterior compartment mesh repair without simultaneous suburethral sling placement operated on in the period 2005-2012 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Patients with previous anti-incontinence surgery with normal urodynamics were not excluded; 30 patients with incomplete data, severe perioperative complications, and urinary retention before and after the surgery were excluded. Urinary retention was defined as post-void residual over 150 ml more than 48 h after permanent catheter removal. The rate of urinary retention after anterior compartment repair by mesh anchored to the SSL from an anterior approach (SSLS group) was compared to that following transobturator mesh repair often combined with SSL fixation from the posterior approach (TOT group). RESULTS: Of the 94 patients considered for statistical analysis, 62 were from the SLSS group and 32 from the TOT group. The groups were comparable in age (mean 65.5 vs 66.3), body mass index (24.8 vs 25.9), and parity (2.4 vs 2.9). Patients from the SSLS group had higher rates of prior vaginal reconstructive (27 vs 19 %) and anti-incontinence surgery (26 vs 19 %). Postoperative urinary retention was statistically significantly more frequent in the SSLS group compared to the TOT group [(17 (27 %) vs 2 (6.25 %), odds ratio 5.7, 95 % confidence interval 1.2-26.3, p = 0.027]. Hospital discharge with self-catheterization was statistically insignificantly more frequent in the SSLS group [8 % (5) vs 3 % (1)]. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive dissection needed for SSL suspension from an anterior approach may lead to more frequent postoperative voiding difficulties. This phenomenon could be explained by more considerable injury to pelvic splanchnic nerves during the dissection. A large prospective study is needed for validation of our results.


Subject(s)
Cystocele/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Urination Disorders/epidemiology , Aged , Female , Humans , Incidence , Ligaments/surgery , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Urinary Retention/epidemiology
7.
Prog Urol ; 22(17): 1077-83, 2012 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23182123

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess anatomical and functional preliminary results, and safety of a new surgical approach for a combined treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) of anterior and medium compartments, using a mesh attached through the sacrospinous ligaments with the UpHold(®) system (Boston Scientific) and the Capio(®). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A longitudinal case series of 59 consecutive patients operated between October 2009 and January 2012, by five senior surgeons in a single tertiary unit. RESULTS: Mean age was 66.9 years. Ten patients (17%) had previous pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. There was no intraoperative complication. Mean follow-up was 12 months. Anatomical success for both anterior and apical compartments, i.e. Ba and C/D point<1, was 93% (52/56). Anatomical results shown correction of cystocele with a mean Ba point from+0.79 cm (range -3 to +8) to -2.35 cm (range -3 to 0), correction of uterine/vaul prolapse with a mean C/D point from+0.14 cm (range -6 to+8) to -7.29 cm (range -9 to -1), and correction of rectocele with a mean Bp point from -0.68 cm (range -3 to 7) to -2.77 cm (range -3 to -1). Two patients required further surgery for mesh exposure (3.5%). One patient had a unilateral pudendal neuropathic pain postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In the current series, utero-vaginal suspension using a bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh was associated with good anatomical success rates. Prospective, comparative and long-term data are needed.


Subject(s)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Surgical Mesh , Aged , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Uterus , Vagina
8.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 40(10): 561-5, 2012 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22099979

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate results, complications and the satisfaction of patients after labia minora, reduction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It was a retrospective study. Twenty-six patients underwent a labia minora reduction by longitudinal resection in the service of gynecological surgery of the hospital Tenon during a two-year period. Patients were 14 to 64 years old (median=25 years old). The motivations were aesthetic or functional, with entry dyspareunia, discomfort with exercise, and discomfort in clothing. The anatomical result was estimated at the postoperative consultation, one month later. Patient satisfaction was estimated in the long term by a phone questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no complication to type haematoma or wound dehiscence. The anatomical result was satisfactory for 95% of the patients. Twenty questionnaires were completed. All the patients having answered were satisfied with the aesthetic result. Only one patient was dissatisfied of the functional result with a loss of clitoral "flexibility". DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Reduction of labia minoria according to the amputation technique of is simple, safe, with few complications and high patient satisfaction. However, the size of the sample is low and further studies are warranted.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Vulva/pathology , Vulva/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Dyspareunia/surgery , Female , Humans , Hypertrophy/surgery , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Retrospective Studies , Surgery, Plastic/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
9.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 38(11): 710-3, 2010 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21030282

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility and results of mid-urethral sling placement for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in adult women after transurethral injection therapy failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients were operated on for a mid-urethral sling placement after at least one transurethral injection therapy, from January 2005 to February 2008. Injections were performed for moderate non-daily SUI, or according to patient willingness, or for SUI surgical history. Mean age at the time of surgery was 59.9 years (range: 33 to 84). RESULTS: Mean operative time, including control cystoscopy time during TVT placement, was 26 minutes (20-35). There were no peri-operative complications, nor problems for dissection or tape placement. At a mean follow-up of 9.9 months (5-20), 9/11 (81%) patients were dry with no lower urinary tract disorders. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: SUI treatment by mid-urethral sling after transurethral injections failure is feasible not bothered by the injected material and effective at short-term.


Subject(s)
Suburethral Slings , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Injections , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Urethra/surgery , Vagina/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...