Predictions of metabolic drug-drug interactions using physiologically based modelling: Two cytochrome P450 3A4 substrates coadministered with ketoconazole or verapamil.

Nowadays, evaluation of potential risk of metabolic drug-drug interactions (mDDIs) is of high importance within the pharmaceutical industry, in order to improve safety and reduce the attrition rate of new drugs. Accurate and early prediction of mDDIs has become essential for drug research and development, and in vitro experiments designed to evaluate potential mDDIs are systematically included in the drug development plan prior to clinical assessment. The aim of this study was to illustrate the value and limitations of the classical and new approaches available to predict risks of DDIs in the research and development processes. The interaction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole and verapamil) with midazolam was predicted using the inhibitor concentration/inhibition constant ([I]/K(i)) approach, the static approach with added variability (Simcyp(R)), and whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (WB-PBPK) modelling (acslXtreme(R)). Then an in-house reference drug was used to challenge the different approaches based on the midazolam experience. Predicted values (pharmacokinetic parameters, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC] ratio and plasma concentrations) were compared with observed values obtained after intravenous and oral administration in order to assess the accuracy of the prediction methods. With the [I]/K(i) approach, the interaction risk was always overpredicted for the midazolam substrate, regardless of its route of administration and the coadministered inhibitor. However, the predictions were always satisfactory (within 2-fold) for the reference drug. For the Simcyp(R) calculations, two of the three interaction results for midazolam were overpredicted, both when midazolam was given orally, whereas the prediction obtained when midazolam was administered intravenously was satisfactory. For the reference drug, all predictions could be considered satisfactory. For the WB-PBPK approach, all predictions were satisfactory, regardless of the substrate, route of administration, dose and coadministered inhibitor. DDI risk predictions are performed throughout the research and development processes and are now fully integrated into decision-making processes. The regulatory approach is useful to provide alerts, even at a very early stage of drug development. The 'steady state' approach in Simcyp(R) improves the prediction by using physiological knowledge and mechanistic assumptions. The DDI predictions are very useful, as they provide a range of AUC ratios that include individuals at the extremes of the population, in addition to the 'average tendency'. Finally, the WB-PBPK approach improves the predictions by simulating the concentration-time profiles and calculating the related pharmacokinetic parameters, taking into account the time of administration of each drug - but it requires a good understanding of the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion properties of the compound.

Drug-drug interaction predictions with PBPK models and optimal multiresponse sampling time designs: application to midazolam and a phase I compound. Part 2: clinical trial results.

PURPOSE: To compare results of population PK analyses obtained with a full empirical design (FD) and an optimal sparse design (MD) in a Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) study aiming to evaluate the potential CYP3A4 inhibitory effect of a drug in development, SX, on a reference substrate, midazolam (MDZ). Secondary aim was to evaluate the interaction of SX on MDZ in the in vivo study. Methods To compare designs, real data were analysed by population PK modelling technique using either FD or MD with NONMEM FOCEI for SX and with NONMEM FOCEI and MONOLIX SAEM for MDZ. When applicable a Wald test was performed to compare model parameter estimates, such as apparent clearance (CL/F), across designs. To conclude on the potential interaction of SX on MDZ PK, a Student paired test was applied to compare the individual PK parameters (i.e. log(AUC) and log(C(max))) obtained either by a non-compartmental approach (NCA) using FD or from empirical Bayes estimates (EBE) obtained after fitting the model separately on each treatment group using either FD or MD. RESULTS: For SX, whatever the design, CL/F was well estimated and no statistical differences were found between CL/F estimated values obtained with FD (CL/F = 8.2 l/h) and MD (CL/F = 8.2 l/h). For MDZ, only MONOLIX was able to estimate CL/F and to provide its standard error of estimation with MD. With MONOLIX, whatever the design and the administration setting, MDZ CL/F was well estimated and there were no statistical differences between CL/F estimated values obtained with FD (72 l/h and 40 l/h for MDZ alone and for MDZ with SX, respectively) and MD (77 l/h and 45 l/h for MDZ alone and for MDZ with SX, respectively). Whatever the approach, NCA or population PK modelling, and for the latter approach, whatever the design, MD or FD, comparison tests showed that there was a statistical difference (P < 0.0001) between individual MDZ log(AUC) obtained after MDZ administration alone and co-administered with SX. Regarding C(max), there was a statistical difference (P < 0.05) between individual MDZ log(C(max)) obtained under the 2 administration settings in all cases, except with the sparse design with MONOLIX. However, the effect on C(max) was small. Finally, SX was shown to be a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, which at therapeutic doses increased MDZ exposure by a factor of 2 in average and almost did not affect the C(max). CONCLUSION: The optimal sparse design enabled the estimation of CL/F of a CYP3A4 substrate and inhibitor when co-administered together and to show the interaction leading to the same conclusion as the full empirical design.