Breast cancer in Latin America: experts perceptions compared with medical care standards.

BACKGROUND: The BCRF II study presents a systematic review of the norms, recommendations and guidelines that are considered medical care standards (MCS) for breast cancer in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Three key questions from the BCRF I survey data on early detection and diagnosis are presented to identify implementation practice patterns related to MCS. METHODS: Information related to MCS was requested from governmental health authorities, cancer institutes, and national scientific and professional societies in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Documents received were reviewed by breast cancer experts from each respective country. Three key survey questions from the BCRF I survey on early detection and diagnosis were reprocessed to provide information related to implementation practice of existing MCS. RESULTS: All countries included in the BCRF II study had medical care standards (MCS) whether published by governmental authorities, national professional or scientific associations, cancer institutes, or adoption of international MCS. Experts reported different practice patterns at a Country level versus a Center level. Overall, 85% of the experts reported that less than 50% of the women with no symptoms undergo a mammography at the Country level compared to 43% at the Center level. For diagnostic suspicion of breast cancer, 80% of experts considered the diagnostic suspicion at a Country level to come from the patient compared to 50% at a Center level. About 30% of patients waited for more than 3 months for a diagnosis at the Country level compared to 7% at the Center level. CONCLUSION: All the Latin America and Caribbean countries in the study reported the use of similar MCS for breast cancer care. The reported difference between care practiced at a Country level versus a Center level suggests the challenge is not in generating new MCS, but in implementing policies and control mechanisms for compliance with existing MCS, guaranteeing their applicability to all populations.

Cáncer de mama Latinoamericano / Breast cancer in Latin America

La incidencia del cáncer de mama en países latinoamericanos es menor que en países más desarrollados, mientras que la tasa de mortalidad es mayor. Estas diferencias están relacionadas probablemente con diferencias en estrategias de despistaje y acceso al tratamiento. Se necesitan datos basados en población a fin de que sea posible tomar decisiones informadas. En el año 2006 se llevó a cabo una encuesta telefónica de 65 preguntas, que incluyó a 100 expertos en cáncer de mama de 12 países latinoamericanos, efectuando un análisis exploratorio del estado actual del tratamiento de cáncer de mama en estas regiones, tanto a nivel país como a nivel centro. Más del 90% de los países no tienen ley nacional o guía para screening mamográfico. La tasa de acceso a mamografía fue del 66,3% a nivel país y del 47,0% a nivel centro. La diferencia en la atención, basada en el nivel (país versus centro), fue indicada por la iniciación del tratamiento luego del diagnóstico, el tiempo desde el diagnóstico inicial al tratamiento y el tiempo desde la cirugía hasta la quimioterapia inicial. Sin embargo, las pruebas diagnósticas más sofisticadas para receptores hormonales y moleculares están disponibles en la mayoría de los centros (>80%), y en total, casi el 80% de las pacientes comenzaron el tratamiento dentro de los 3 meses del diagnóstico. La variación en la atención entre el nivel del centro versus el nivel del país para la atención del cáncer de mama, indica una necesidad de programas nacionales para el cuidado del cáncer. También se concluye que son necesarias estrategias alternativas de recolección de datos, a fin de comprender mejor el estado de los programas de control del cáncer de mama en países en desarrollo

Cáncer de mama Latinoamericano / Breast cancer in Latin America

La incidencia del cáncer de mama en países latinoamericanos es menor que en países más desarrollados, mientras que la tasa de mortalidad es mayor. Estas diferencias están relacionadas probablemente con diferencias en estrategias de despistaje y acceso al tratamiento. Se necesitan datos basados en población a fin de que sea posible tomar decisiones informadas. En el año 2006 se llevó a cabo una encuesta telefónica de 65 preguntas, que incluyó a 100 expertos en cáncer de mama de 12 países latinoamericanos, efectuando un análisis exploratorio del estado actual del tratamiento de cáncer de mama en estas regiones, tanto a nivel país como a nivel centro. Más del 90% de los países no tienen ley nacional o guía para screening mamográfico. La tasa de acceso a mamografía fue del 66,3% a nivel país y del 47,0% a nivel centro. La diferencia en la atención, basada en el nivel (país versus centro), fue indicada por la iniciación del tratamiento luego del diagnóstico, el tiempo desde el diagnóstico inicial al tratamiento y el tiempo desde la cirugía hasta la quimioterapia inicial. Sin embargo, las pruebas diagnósticas más sofisticadas para receptores hormonales y moleculares están disponibles en la mayoría de los centros (>80%), y en total, casi el 80% de las pacientes comenzaron el tratamiento dentro de los 3 meses del diagnóstico. La variación en la atención entre el nivel del centro versus el nivel del país para la atención del cáncer de mama, indica una necesidad de programas nacionales para el cuidado del cáncer. También se concluye que son necesarias estrategias alternativas de recolección de datos, a fin de comprender mejor el estado de los programas de control del cáncer de mama en países en desarrollo

A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin alone versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (Mayo Clinic regimen) in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of both oxaliplatin as a single agent and oxaliplatin in combination with dailyx5 bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (5-FU/FA, Mayo clinic regimen) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. 73 advanced CRC patients were randomised to receive either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (35 patients), or the same treatment combined with 5-FU 425 mg/m(2)/day and FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks (38 patients). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients had documented inoperable disease and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease. Based on the investigators' assessment of best response, objective response rate was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2-24%) in the oxaliplatin arm, and 45% (95% CI 27-64%) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months (95% CI 1.7-2.4 months) in the oxaliplatin arm and 3.9 months (95% CI 2.9-5 months) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Severe neutropenia was seen in 23% of patients in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, and none in the oxaliplatin arm. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. In the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, severe diarrhoea, vomiting and stomatitis were seen in 34, 14 and 14% of the patients, respectively. In conclusion, oxaliplatin at a dose of 85 mg/m(2) given every 2 weeks was well tolerated and has limited activity in metastatic CRC, while the combination of this treatment with the full-dose Mayo clinic regimen (5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day+FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks), although active, was unfeasible due to a high level of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Alternative lower dosing or other regimens are to be explored to ascertain the value of bolus 5-FU/FA combined with oxaliplatin.

Single-agent gemcitabine in pretreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: results of an Argentinean multicentre phase II trial.

The activity and mild toxicity profile of single-agent gemcitabine therapy in untreated (chemonaive) patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well documented. This phase II trial was conducted to determine the objective tumour response rate and toxicity profile of single-agent gemcitabine in pretreated patients with NSCLC. Patients with histological evidence of advanced NCSLC stage IIIB or IV; at least one prior chemotherapy regimen including a platinum or taxane analogue; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2; clinically measurable disease; adequate bone marrow reserve; and adequate renal function; received 1000 mg m(-2) gemcitabine administered over 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle defined as 3 weekly treatments followed by 1 week of rest. Twenty-nine patients were evaluated for efficacy and 32 for toxicity. One patient achieved a complete response and five patients had a partial response resulting in a total response rate of 20.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6-34). Median response duration was 7 months (range 4-11 months). Twelve (41%) patients reached stable disease after two cycles of therapy and 11 (38%) patients had disease progression. Median progression-free survival time was 3 months and median overall survival time was 5.5 months. Toxicity was generally mild (grades 0-2). Severe (grade 3 or 4) haematological toxicities included grade 3 anaemia in one patient and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in two patients. Severe non-haematological toxicities included one patient each with grade 3 liver transaminase elevations, nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea. This study confirms the activity and safety of single-agent gemcitabine in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC who are refractory or sensitive to first-line therapy.

Phase II of doxorubicin/taxol in metastatic breast cancer. Argentine Multicenter Taxol Group.

PURPOSE: To assess the response rate, survival, and toxicity of Taxol (paclitaxel) as 1-h infusion plus doxorubicin as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with untreated MBC were recruited. All of them had measurable disease and were evaluable for toxicity. Fifty-five percent of the patients had visceral involvement. The dose of doxorubicin was fixed at 50 mg/m2 as a short intravenous infusion, followed by 200 mg/m2 of Taxol as a 1-h intravenous infusion. Doxorubicin was administered during the first seven cycles, continuing with Taxol only up to a maximum of ten cycles. RESULTS: Neutropenia was the most important toxicity: 30% grade 3 and 18% grade 4. Only 2 patients showed a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) which caused discontinuing the treatment. No clinical congestive heart failure (CHF) was observed. Seventy-four patients were eligible for response evaluation: 10 (14%) achieved complete response (CR) and 46 (62%) achieved partial response (PR). The mean duration of response was 13.47+/-1.35 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.82; 16.12) and the mean survival was 21.50+/-1.42 months (95% CI: 18.72; 24.29). CONCLUSION: The overall response (OR) rate was 76%. No CHF was assessed and 2 patients stopped treatment due to LVEF decrease. Although doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 followed by Taxol 200 mg/m2 in 1-h intravenous infusion presents a toxicity profile which demands a close follow-up, it represents a convenient outpatient schedule with similar activity rate compared to longer Taxol infusions.

Paclitaxel in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. Argentine Multicenter Taxol Group.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Princeton, NJ) is an antineoplastic agent that inhibits microtubular function and has shown efficacy in several solid tumors, mainly ovarian tumors, in which 20% to 40% response rates in previously treated patients were observed. We conducted a study to assess survival, response rate, and toxicity associated with paclitaxel treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer resistant to platinum therapy. Between September 1994 and November 1996, 38 patients were admitted for study and 37 were evaluable. All had disease progression or relapse within 1 year of receiving platinum-containing first-line chemotherapy. Mean age was 59 years (range, 30 to 75 years), all had bulky disease, and 18 showed increased carbohydrate antigen-125 at admission. They were treated every 3 weeks with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion, preceded by standard premedication. Response rate was 51.3%, with a median response duration of 10.0 months and a median survival rate of 16.8 months. Mild to moderate hematologic toxicity was observed with only one episode of grade 4 neutropenia, without fever. Gastrointestinal toxicity was moderate and peripheral neuropathy was mild, except for two patients who had concomitant pathologies or previous treatment, which might have caused some neuropathy. We concluded that paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion was easily administered for ambulatory treatment, with mild to moderate toxicity and promising results based on rate and duration of response as well as survival.

Phase II trial of 4'-epi-doxorubicin in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma received an i.v. bolus of 4'-epi-doxorubicin, 75/mg/m2/cycle, every 21 days. Partial responses were observed in 5 of 23 evaluable patients (21.7%). Treatment was generally well tolerated and toxicity was mild. The response rate to epirubicin appears to be very similar to that reported for doxorubicin. Larger doses of epirubicin could be safely used in future studies, and further evaluation of epirubicin in phase III trials is indicated.

Undergraduate teaching of oncology in Argentina.

Cancer is a public health problem in Argentina, and the role of the country's physicians in the fight against this disease is very important. Whether they are general physicians or specialists, including clinical oncologists, they must have basic knowledge and permanent updating in oncology. Unfortunately, the teaching of oncology is deficient in this country, the deficiencies being already noticeable at the undergraduate level where the teaching is incomplete and dispersed. In order to ascertain the level of oncologic information which medical students about to graduate had acquired, 15-hour courses were organized in 1983 to 1984 for students of the Universities of Buenos Aires, La Plata, and Del Salvador. The participants had to fill in a questionnaire of 50 questions of increasing complexity before and after the course. The comparison of both inquiries clearly showed the usefulness of the course, particularly regarding cancer control, early diagnosis, treatment, and curability. The overall error decreased by 50% after the course. However, some erroneous ideas still existed and it became evident that certain of the subjects must be studied in greater depth.

Phase II trials of 5-FU, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced, measurable adenocarcinoma of the lung and stomach.

A combination of 5-FU (600 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8), doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 on Day 1), and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on Day 1) has been used for treatment of 31 patients with advanced measurable adenocarcinoma of the lung and 35 with gastric cancer. The regimen was given every 4 weeks until disease progression to patients who had not received prior chemotherapy. One complete response occurred in the lung cancer group. Ten of the gastric cancer patients (29%) had partial responses. The median duration of response was 5.5 months and the median survival in responding patients was 10.8 months. Toxicity of the regimen was moderate. We conclude that this combination offers no particular advantages over previously described treatments for these diseases.