Humoral response after the fourth dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the CKD spectrum: a prespecified analysis of the SENCOVAC study.

BACKGROUND: There is scarce evidence on the fourth dose of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccines in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We evaluated the humoral response and effectivity of the fourth dose in the CKD spectrum: non-dialysis CKD (ND-CKD), haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients. METHODS: This is a prespecified analysis of the prospective, observational, multicentric SENCOVAC study. In patients with CKD who had received a complete initial vaccination and one or two boosters and had anti-Spike antibody determinations 6 and 12 months after the initial vaccination, we analysed factors associated with persistent negative humoral response and higher anti-Spike antibody titres as well as the efficacy of vaccination on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity. RESULTS: Of 2186 patients (18% KT, 8% PD, 69% HD and 5% ND-CKD), 30% had received a fourth dose. The fourth dose increased anti-Spike antibody titres in HD (P = .001) and ND-CKD (P = .014) patients and seroconverted 72% of previously negative patients. Higher anti-Spike antibody titres at 12 months were independently associated with repeated exposure to antigen (fourth dose, previous breakthrough infections), previous anti-Spike antibody titres and not being a KT recipient. Breakthrough COVID-19 was registered in 137 (6%) patients, 5% of whom required admission. Admitted patients had prior titres <620 UI/ml and median values were lower (P = .020) than in non-admitted patients. CONCLUSIONS: A fourth vaccine dose increased anti-Spike antibody titres or seroconverted many CKD patients, but those with the highest need for a vaccine booster (i.e. those with lower pre-booster antibody titres or KT recipients) derived the least benefit in terms of antibody titres. Admission for breakthrough COVID-19 was associated with low anti-Spike antibody titres.

Anti-Spike antibodies 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine booster dose in patients on hemodialysis: the prospective SENCOVAC study.

Background: Patients on hemodialysis are at high-risk for complications derived from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The present analysis evaluated the impact of a booster vaccine dose and breakthrough severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections on humoral immunity 3 months after the booster dose. Methods: This is a multicentric and prospective study assessing immunoglobulin G anti-Spike antibodies 6 and 9 months after initial SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients on hemodialysis that had also received a booster dose before the 6-month assessment (early booster) or between the 6- and 9-month assessments (late booster). The impact of breakthrough infections, type of vaccine, time from the booster and clinical variables were assessed. Results: A total of 711 patients [67% male, median age (range) 67 (20-89) years] were included. Of these, 545 (77%) received an early booster and the rest a late booster. At 6 months, 64 (9%) patients had negative anti-Spike antibody titers (3% of early booster and 29% of late booster patients, P = .001). At 9 months, 91% of patients with 6-month negative response had seroconverted and there were no differences in residual prevalence of negative humoral response between early and late booster patients (0.9% vs 0.6%, P = .693). During follow-up, 35 patients (5%) developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antibody titers at 9 months were independently associated with mRNA-1273 booster (P = .001), lower time from booster (P = .043) and past breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection (P < .001). Conclusions: In hemodialysis patients, higher titers of anti-Spike antibodies at 9 months were associated with mRNA-1273 booster, lower time from booster and past breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Experiencia de hemodiálisis con dializador de mediano poro en la nefropatía por cilindros del mieloma / Experience of using hemodialysis with medium cut-off dialyzer in cast nephropathy

No disponible

IgA Nephropathy After Renal Transplant: Recurrences and De Novo Cases.

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) recurrence in the renal graft is variable. Several factors can influence the risk of recurrence of IgAN and renal graft failure. We carried out a retrospective observational study between the years 1990 and 2018. The study group was patients diagnosed, by means of biopsy, as having post-renal transplant (RT) IgAN in our hospital in the study period. The control group was patients with pre-RT histologic diagnosis of IgAN who did not develop recurrence of the disease after the RT. A total of 1535 RTs were performed in our center in the study period. Of those, 24 patients developed IgAN in the renal graft. The time elapsed from the RT to the development of allograft IgAN was 7 (SD, 5.3) years. The patients with allograft IgAN tended to be younger (P = .069), and HLA-DR4 was more common in these patients (P = .078). We observed a very significant difference in the use of induction immunosuppressive therapy (study group vs control group: 13.6% vs 57.7%, P < .001). The 3 patients who presented crescents in the biopsy specimen lost the renal graft. As in the native kidney, the presence of crescents is an indicator of poor prognosis. In our experience, the patients with post-RT IgAN received induction therapy less frequently; this finding would support the conclusion that such treatments should be applied to patients with pre-RT diagnosis of IgAN.