Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(1): 179-187, 2024 01 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37552784

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scarce data are available comparing infective endocarditis (IE) following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to compare the clinical presentation, microbiological profile, management, and outcomes of IE after SAVR versus TAVR. METHODS: Data were collected from the "Infectious Endocarditis after TAVR International" (enrollment from 2005 to 2020) and the "International Collaboration on Endocarditis" (enrollment from 2000 to 2012) registries. Only patients with an IE affecting the aortic valve prosthesis were included. A 1:1 paired matching approach was used to compare patients with TAVR and SAVR. RESULTS: A total of 1688 patients were included. Of them, 602 (35.7%) had a surgical bioprosthesis (SB), 666 (39.5%) a mechanical prosthesis, 70 (4.2%) a homograft, and 350 (20.7%) a transcatheter heart valve. In the SAVR versus TAVR matched population, the rate of new moderate or severe aortic regurgitation was higher in the SB group (43.4% vs 13.5%; P < .001), and fewer vegetations were diagnosed in the SB group (62.5% vs 82%; P < .001). Patients with an SB had a higher rate of perivalvular extension (47.9% vs 27%; P < .001) and Staphylococcus aureus was less common in this group (13.4% vs 22%; P = .033). Despite a higher rate of surgery in patients with SB (44.4% vs 27.3%; P < .001), 1-year mortality was similar (SB: 46.5%; TAVR: 44.8%; log-rank P = .697). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical presentation, type of causative microorganism, and treatment differed between patients with an IE located on SB compared with TAVR. Despite these differences, both groups exhibited high and similar mortality at 1-year follow-up.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial , Endocarditis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Aortic Valve Stenosis/etiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Endocarditis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/etiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Endocarditis/epidemiology , Endocarditis/etiology , Endocarditis/surgery , Risk Factors
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 894: 164972, 2023 Oct 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37336396

ABSTRACT

The Tuscan Archipelago, with its great environmental and economic importance, is one of the highest oil spill density areas in the Western Mediterranean. In this study, an interdisciplinary approach, based on numerical applications and experimental methods, was implemented to quantify the risk of oil spill impact along the rocky shores of this archipelago in relation to the maritime activities. The risk, defined as a combination of the hazard and the damage, was quantified for the biennial 2019-2020 in order to account for the effects generated by the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on the local maritime traffic. A high-resolution oceanographic and particle tracking model was applied to simulate the trajectories of possible oil spill events and to quantify the hazard of impacts on the coast of numerical particles, daily seeded in correspondence of those marine sectors that are characterised by relevant traffic of vessels. The damage, expressed as the product of exposure and vulnerability, was estimated following an extensive sampling approach aimed at quantifying the ecological status of the rocky shores in four selected islands of the Tuscan Archipelago. Results revealed and quantified the direct relationship between the temporary reduction of the maritime traffic due to the pandemic restrictions, and the probability of suffering damage from oil spill impact along the archipelago's rocky shores, which was highly context-dependent.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Petroleum Pollution , Humans , Petroleum Pollution/adverse effects , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Biodiversity
3.
J Clin Med ; 11(14)2022 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35887843

ABSTRACT

Intravenous drug use is a predisposing condition for infective endocarditis (IE). We report the clinical features of IE, taken from the Italian Registry of IE, in people who inject drugs (PWIDs). The registry prospectively collected epidemiological, clinical, in-hospital, and follow-up data on patients with IE from 17 Italian centers. A total of 677 patients were enrolled, and 61 (9%) were intravenous drug users (IDUs). Most PWIDs were male (78.6%), and aged between 41 and 50 years old (50%). The most frequent comorbidities were HIV (34.4%) and chronic liver disease (32%). Predisposing factors for IE were present in 6.5% of the patients, and 10% had minor valvular abnormalities. IE had occurred previously in 16.4% of the patients, and 50% of them had undergone heart surgery. Overall mortality was 9.8% in IDUs and 20% in patients with recurrent IE. IE in PWIDs mostly affected the native valves (90%). The echocardiographic diagnosis of IE was based on the detection of vegetation in 91.82% of cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the main microorganism isolated (70%) from blood cultures. Thirty patients (49%) underwent heart surgery: thirteen had aortic valves, eleven had mitral valves, and six had tricuspid valve interventions. IE in PWIDs was relatively common, and patients with native valve right-sided IE had a better prognosis, with a low rate of surgical interventions.

4.
Eur Heart J Suppl ; 22(Suppl M): M43-M50, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33664639

ABSTRACT

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke (CS) both have a high prevalence. The optimal treatment to reduce stroke recurrence after CS remains controversial. Results from clinical trials, meta-analyses, and position papers, support percutaneous PFO device closure and medical therapy compared to medical therapy alone. However, the procedure may be associated with cardiac complications including an increased incidence of new atrial fibrillation. The benefit/risk balance should be determined on a case-by-case basis with the greatest benefit of PFO closure in patients with atrial septal aneurysm and PFO with large shunts. Future studies should address unsolved questions such as the choice of medical therapy in patients not undergoing closure, the duration of antiplatelet therapy, and the role of PFO closure in patients over 60 years old.

5.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 20(7): 414-418, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31593558

ABSTRACT

: The 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis recommend the use of a multidisciplinary team in the care of patients with infective endocarditis. A standardized collaborative approach should be implemented in centres with immediate access to different imaging techniques, cardiac surgery and health professionals from several specialties. This position paper has been produced by the Task Force for Management of Infective Endocarditis of Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) with the aim of providing recommendations for the implementation of the Endocarditis Team within the Italian hospital network. On the basis of the Italian hospital network with many cardiology facilities encompassing a total of 405 intensive cardiac care units (ICCUs) across the country, 224 (3.68 per million inhabitants) of which have on-site 24-h PCI capability, but with relatively few centres equipped with cardiac surgery and nuclear medicine, in the present article, the SIECVI Task Force for Management of Infective Endocarditis develops the idea of a network where 'functional' reference centres act as a link with the periphery and with 'structural' reference centres. A number of minimum characteristics are provided for these 'functional' reference centres. Outcome and cost analysis of implementing an Endocarditis Team with functional referral is expected to be derived from ongoing Italian and European registries.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Imaging Techniques/standards , Cardiology Service, Hospital/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Endocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Endocarditis/therapy , Patient Care Team/standards , Regional Health Planning/standards , Consensus , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Predictive Value of Tests , Treatment Outcome
6.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 26(4): 602-609, 2018 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29272391

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Observational studies on early surgery in infective endocarditis have conflicting results. This study aims to compare the treatment strategies for early surgery (within 2 weeks of diagnosis) and late surgery/medical therapy in terms of survival among patients with the left-sided infective endocarditis. METHODS: This study included patients with the left-sided infective endocarditis registered between 2006 and 2010 in the Italian Registry of Infective Endocarditis (RIEI). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the effect of these treatment strategies on overall survival and included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with treatment, risk factors for mortality and early surgery as a time-dependent covariate to avoid indication and immortal time biases. RESULTS: Among the 502 patients included, 184 (36.7%) underwent early surgery. Of the remaining 318 patients, 138 underwent late surgery. The early surgery group had fewer patients with comorbidities and with enterococcus as the causative microorganism, but this group had more complicated cardiac conditions. No difference in mortality risk was estimated between the treatment groups including early surgery as time-dependent variables (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.63), while a distorted and overestimated beneficial effect of surgery was estimated considering surgery as a non-time-dependent variable (adjusted hazard ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not confirm a better overall survival in patients undergoing early surgery. However, even with the use of statistical techniques to control biases, we could not draw definitive conclusions that early surgery is not beneficial. Our results need to be assessed by randomized trials before any changes in clinical practice can be recommended.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Endocarditis/surgery , Registries , Risk Assessment , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Endocarditis/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors
7.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 25(2): 241-245, 2017 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486657

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Minimal access mitral valve surgery (MVS) has already proved to be feasible and effective with low perioperative mortality and excellent long-term outcomes. However, experience in more complex valve diseases such as infective endocarditis (IE) still remains limited. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate early and long-term results of minimal access MVS for IE. METHODS: Data were entered into a dedicated database. Analysis was performed retrospectively for the 8-year period between January 2007 and April 2015. RESULTS: During the study period, 35 consecutive patients underwent minimal access MVS for IE at our department. Twenty-four had diagnosis of native MV endocarditis (68.6%) and 11 of mitral prosthesis endocarditis (31.4%).Thirty patients underwent early MVS (85.7%), and 5 patients were operated after the completion of antibiotic treatment (14.3%). Seven patients underwent MV repair (20%), 17 patients underwent MV replacement (48.6%), and 11 patients underwent mitral prosthesis replacement (31.4%). Thirty-day mortality was 11.4% (4 patients). No neurological or vascular complications were reported. One patient underwent reoperation for prosthesis IE relapse after 37 days. Overall actuarial survival rate at 1 and 5 years was 83%; freedom from MV reoperation and/or recurrence of IE at 1 and 5 years was 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive MVS for IE is feasible and associated with good early and long-term results. Preoperative accurate patient selection and transoesophageal echocardiography evaluation is mandatory for surgical planning.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Mitral Valve , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Thoracotomy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Endocarditis/surgery , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Valve Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors
8.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J ; 16(2): 59-65, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27676162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: AtrioVentricular (AV) and InterVentricular (VV) delay optimization can improve ventricular function in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) and is usually performed by means of echocardiography. St Jude Medical has developed an automated algorhythm which calculates the optimal AV and VV delays (QuickOpt™) based on Intracardiac ElectroGrams, (IEGM), within 2 min. So far, the efficacy of the algorhythm has been tested acutely with standard lead position at right ventricular (RV) apex. Aim of this project is to evaluate the algorhythm performance in the mid- and long-term with RV lead located in mid-septum. METHODS: AV and VV delays optimization data were collected in 13 centers using both echocardiographic and QuickOpt™ guidance in CRTD implanted patients provided with this algorhythm. Measurements of the aortic Velocity Time Integral (aVTI) were performed with both methods in a random order at pre-discharge, 6-month and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were studied (46 males; age 68 ± 10y; EF 28 ± 7%). Maximum aVTI obtained by echocardiography at different AV delays, were compared with aVTI acquired at AV delays suggested by QuickOpt. The AV Pearson correlations were 0.96 at pre-discharge, 0.95 and 0,98 at 6- and 12- month follow-up respectively. After programming optimal AV, the same approach was used to compare echocardiographic aVTI with aVTI corresponding to the VV values provided by QuickOpt. The VV Pearson Correlation were 0,92 at pre-discharge, 0,88 and 0.90 at 6-month and 12- month follow-up respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IEGM-based optimization provides comparable results with echocardiographic method (maximum aVTI) used as reference with mid-septum RV lead location.

9.
Am Heart J ; 179: 42-50, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27595678

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) for prevention of infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with predisposing cardiac condition (PCC) undergoing invasive procedures is still debated. We sought to assess the prevalence of PCC, the type of interventional procedures preceding the onset of symptoms, and the usefulness of AP in a large cohort of consecutive patients with definite IE. METHODS: We examined 677 (median age 65.34 years; male 492 [73%]) consecutive patients with IE enrolled from July 2007 through 2010 into the Italian Registry of Infective Endocarditis. RESULTS: Predisposing cardiac condition was present in 341 patients (50%).Thirty-two patients (4.7%) underwent dental procedures. Of 20 patients with PCC undergoing dental procedure, 13 had assumed AP. Viridans group streptococci were isolated from blood cultures in 8 of 20 patients with PCC and prior dental procedure. Nondental procedures preceded IE in 139 patients (21%). They were significantly older and had more comordibities compared with patients undergoing dental procedures. Predisposing cardiac condition was identified in 91 patients. Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis was administered to 67 patients. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent causative agent. Cardiac surgery was necessary in 85 patients (20 with prior dental and 65 with nondental procedure). Surgical mortality (12% vs 0%, P = .03) and hospital mortality (23% vs 3%, P = .001) were significantly larger among patients with nondental procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In a large unselected cohort of patients with IE, the incidence of preceding dental procedures was minimal. The number of cases potentially preventable by means of AP was negligible. Nondental procedures were more frequent than dental procedures and were correlated with poorer prognosis.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Endocarditis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Heart Valve Diseases/epidemiology , Heart Valve Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Streptococcal Infections/epidemiology , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Cohort Studies , Defibrillators, Implantable , Dental Implantation , Dental Scaling , Endocarditis/epidemiology , Endocarditis/prevention & control , Endocarditis, Bacterial/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prosthesis Implantation , Risk Factors , Root Canal Therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcus aureus , Tooth Extraction , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Viridans Streptococci
10.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 32(7): 1041-51, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27100526

ABSTRACT

Echocardiography is essential for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE). However, the reproducibility for the echocardiographic assessment of variables relevant to IE is unknown. Objectives of this study were: (1) To define the reproducibility for IE echocardiographic variables and (2) to describe a methodology for assessing quality in an observational cohort containing site-interpreted data. IE reproducibility was assessed on a subset of echocardiograms from subjects enrolled in the International Collaboration on Endocarditis registry. Specific echocardiographic case report forms were used. Intra-observer agreement was assessed from six site readers on ten randomly selected echocardiograms. Inter-observer agreement between sites and an echocardiography core laboratory was assessed on a separate random sample of 110 echocardiograms. Agreement was determined using intraclass correlation (ICC), coverage probability (CP), and limits of agreement for continuous variables and kappa statistics (κweighted) and CP for categorical variables. Intra-observer agreement for LVEF was excellent [ICC = 0.93 ± 0.1 and all pairwise differences for LVEF (CP) were within 10 %]. For IE categorical echocardiographic variables, intra-observer agreement was best for aortic abscess (κweighted = 1.0, CP = 1.0 for all readers). Highest inter-observer agreement for IE categorical echocardiographic variables was obtained for vegetation location (κweighted = 0.95; 95 % CI 0.92-0.99) and lowest agreement was found for vegetation mobility (κweighted = 0.69; 95 % CI 0.62-0.86). Moderate to excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement is observed for echocardiographic variables in the diagnostic assessment of IE. A pragmatic approach for determining echocardiographic data reproducibility in a large, multicentre, site interpreted observational cohort is feasible.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Endocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Endocarditis/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Registries , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left
12.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging ; 8(7): e003397, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26162783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus left-sided native valve infective endocarditis (LNVIE) has higher complication and mortality rates compared with endocarditis from other pathogens. Whether echocardiographic variables can predict prognosis in S aureus LNVIE is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with LNVIE, enrolled between January 2000 and September 2006, in the International Collaboration on Endocarditis were identified. Subjects without S aureus IE were matched to those with S aureus IE by the propensity of having S aureus. Survival differences were determined using log-rank significance tests. Independent echocardiographic predictors of mortality were identified using Cox-proportional hazards models that included inverse probability of treatment weighting and surgery as a time-dependent covariate. Of 727 subjects with LNVIE and 1-year follow-up, 202 had S aureus IE. One-year survival rates were significantly lower for patients with S aureus IE overall (57% S aureus IE versus 80% non-S aureus IE; P<0.001) and in the propensity-matched cohort (59% S aureus IE versus 68% non-S aureus IE; P<0.05). Intracardiac abscess (hazard ratio, 2.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-5.40; P<0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (odds ratio, 3.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-6.04; P=0.004) were the only independent echocardiographic predictors of in-hospital mortality in S aureus LNVIE. Valve perforation (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.68; P=0.006) and intracardiac abscess (hazard ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-3.78; P=0.004) were the only independent predictors of 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: S aureus is an independent predictor of 1-year mortality in subjects with LNVIE. In S aureus LNVIE, intracardiac abscess and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% independently predicted in-hospital mortality and intracardiac abscess and valve perforation independently predicted 1-year mortality.


Subject(s)
Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Abscess/mortality , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnostic imaging , Endocarditis, Bacterial/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnostic imaging , Staphylococcal Infections/mortality , Abscess/microbiology , Abscess/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cooperative Behavior , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/physiopathology , Female , Humans , International Cooperation , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/physiopathology , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left
13.
Int J Cardiol ; 190: 151-6, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25918069

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology of infective endocarditis (IE) is changing due to a number of factors, including aging and health related comorbidities and medical procedures. The aim of this study is to describe the main clinical, epidemiologic and etiologic changes of IE from a large database in Italy. METHODS: We prospectively collected episodes of IE in 17 Italian centers from July 2007 to December 2010. RESULTS: We enrolled 677 patients with definite IE, of which 24% health-care associated. Patients were male (73%) with a median age of 62 years (IQR: 49-74) and 61% had several comorbidities. One hundred and twenty-eight (19%) patients had prosthetic left side IE, 391 (58%) native left side IE, 94 (14%) device-related IE and 54 (8%) right side IE. A predisposing cardiopathy was present in 50%, while odontoiatric and non odontoiatric procedures were reported in 5% and 21% of patients respectively. Symptoms were usually atypical and precocious. The prevalent etiology was represented by Staphylococcus aureus (27%) followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS, 21%), Streptococcus viridans (15%) and enterococci (14%). CNS and enterococci were relatively more frequent in patients with intravascular devices and prosthesis and S. viridans in left native valve. Diagnosis was made by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in 62% and 94% of cases, respectively. The in-hospital mortality was 14% and 1-year mortality was 21%. CONCLUSION: The epidemiology is changing in Italy, where IE more often affects older patients with comorbidities and intravascular devices, with an acute onset and including a high frequency of enterococci. There were few preceding odontoiatric procedures.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Equipment Contamination , Heart Valve Prosthesis/microbiology , Registries , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Endocarditis/diagnosis , Endocarditis/epidemiology , Endocarditis/etiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/etiology , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Streptococcus/isolation & purification
14.
JAMA Intern Med ; 173(16): 1495-504, 2013 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23857547

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: There are limited prospective, controlled data evaluating survival in patients receiving early surgery vs medical therapy for prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). OBJECTIVE: To determine the in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with PVE who undergo valve replacement during index hospitalization compared with patients who receive medical therapy alone, after controlling for survival and treatment selection bias. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were enrolled between June 2000 and December 2006 in the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS), a prospective, multinational, observational cohort of patients with infective endocarditis. Patients hospitalized with definite right- or left-sided PVE were included in the analysis. We evaluated the effect of treatment assignment on mortality, after adjusting for biases using a Cox proportional hazards model that included inverse probability of treatment weighting and surgery as a time-dependent covariate. The cohort was stratified by probability (propensity) for surgery, and outcomes were compared between the treatment groups within each stratum. INTERVENTIONS: Valve replacement during index hospitalization (early surgery) vs medical therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: In-hospital and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1025 patients with PVE, 490 patients (47.8%) underwent early surgery and 535 individuals (52.2%) received medical therapy alone. Compared with medical therapy, early surgery was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in the unadjusted analysis and after controlling for treatment selection bias (in-hospital mortality: hazard ratio [HR], 0.44 [95% CI, 0.38-0.52] and lower 1-year mortality: HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.49-0.67]). The lower mortality associated with surgery did not persist after adjustment for survivor bias (in-hospital mortality: HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.76-1.07] and 1-year mortality: HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.89-1.23]). Subgroup analysis indicated a lower in-hospital mortality with early surgery in the highest surgical propensity quintile (21.2% vs 37.5%; P = .03). At 1-year follow-up, the reduced mortality with surgery was observed in the fourth (24.8% vs 42.9%; P = .007) and fifth (27.9% vs 50.0%; P = .007) quintiles of surgical propensity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Prosthetic valve endocarditis remains associated with a high 1-year mortality rate. After adjustment for differences in clinical characteristics and survival bias, early valve replacement was not associated with lower mortality compared with medical therapy in the overall cohort. Further studies are needed to define the effect and timing of surgery in patients with PVE who have indications for surgery.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial/mortality , Endocarditis, Bacterial/therapy , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality , Prosthesis-Related Infections/mortality , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Aortic Valve/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve/surgery , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Registries , Time-to-Treatment
15.
Echocardiography ; 30(8): 871-9, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23489364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The choice of the imaging modality (transthoracic [TTE] vs. transesophageal echocardiography [TEE]) for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) depends on different variables. Aim of the present study is to provide updated data on the diagnostic sensitivity and the clinical usefulness of TTE vs. TEE from the Italian Registry on IE (RIEI). METHODS: The RIEI has enrolled consecutive cases of IE in every participating centre, evaluating diagnostic and therapeutic data from a real world practice perspective. RESULTS: From July 2007 to October 2010, 658 consecutive cases with definite IE according to Duke criteria have been enrolled in the RIEI (483 males). The following diagnostic echocardiographic exams were performed: 616 TTE (94%) and 476 TEE (72%). A positive TTE was recorded in 399 cases (65%), an uncertain TTE in 108 cases (17%), and a negative TTE in 109 cases (18%). For TEE, a positive study was reported in 451 cases (95%), uncertain in 13 cases (2.7%), and negative in 12 cases (2.5%) (P < 0.001). This difference is not evident in patients with tricuspid valve IE or i.v. drug addiction, and in Streptococcus bovis or Streptococcus viridans IE. TTE was significantly more performed before the admission and earlier than TEE during admission (P = 0.000). TTE was mainly responsible for the initial diagnosis in 59%. TEE contributed to changing the therapeutic approach in 42%. CONCLUSIONS: In the real world, TTE is performed earlier and more commonly, and it is the major echocardiographic tool for the initial diagnosis. TEE confirms its superior diagnostic sensitivity in most cases, although it is relatively underused.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Endocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Endocarditis/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Registries , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
JAMA ; 307(16): 1727-35, 2012 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22535857

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Infection of implantable cardiac devices is an emerging disease with significant morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical characteristics and outcome of cardiac device infective endocarditis (CDIE) with attention to its health care association and to evaluate the association between device removal during index hospitalization and outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study using data from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS), conducted June 2000 through August 2006 in 61 centers in 28 countries. Patients were hospitalized adults with definite endocarditis as defined by modified Duke endocarditis criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: CDIE was diagnosed in 177 (6.4% [95% CI, 5.5%-7.4%]) of a total cohort of 2760 patients with definite infective endocarditis. The clinical profile of CDIE included advanced patient age (median, 71.2 years [interquartile range, 59.8-77.6]); causation by staphylococci (62 [35.0% {95% CI, 28.0%-42.5%}] Staphylococcus aureus and 56 [31.6% {95% CI, 24.9%-39.0%}] coagulase-negative staphylococci); and a high prevalence of health care-associated infection (81 [45.8% {95% CI, 38.3%-53.4%}]). There was coexisting valve involvement in 66 (37.3% [95% CI, 30.2%-44.9%]) patients, predominantly tricuspid valve infection (43/177 [24.3%]), with associated higher mortality. In-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were 14.7% (26/177 [95% CI, 9.8%-20.8%]) and 23.2% (41/177 [95% CI, 17.2%-30.1%]), respectively. Proportional hazards regression analysis showed a survival benefit at 1 year for device removal during the initial hospitalization (28/141 patients [19.9%] who underwent device removal during the index hospitalization had died at 1 year, vs 13/34 [38.2%] who did not undergo device removal; hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.22-0.82]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CDIE, the rate of concomitant valve infection is high, as is mortality, particularly if there is valve involvement. Early device removal is associated with improved survival at 1 year.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Device Removal , Endocarditis/etiology , Endocarditis/mortality , Hospital Mortality/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Aged , Cross Infection/etiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/etiology , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/etiology , Staphylococcal Infections/mortality , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Tricuspid Valve
17.
Heart Lung Circ ; 21(3): 189-92, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21920817

ABSTRACT

We present the case of a 46 year-old male, HCV infected, treated with corrective surgery for tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) immediately after percutaneous closure of the Blalock Taussig shunt. Four months later, the patient had infective endocarditis by Staphylococcus capitis localised on the right side of the patch, treated by oxacillin and gentamycin. The particularity of our report is the unusual location of the acute endocarditis and the bacterium involved: the pulmonary valve is much more likely to be involved in endocarditis in TOF patients and the patch endocarditis has rarely been reported. Moreover, Staphylococcus capitis has never been reported as a cause of acute endocarditis in corrected TOF patients. We believe that antibiotic therapy should be instituted as soon as possible even though an aggressive surgical treatment is mandatory to achieve complete recovery, mainly when clinical condition and inflammation markers do not improve.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Tetralogy of Fallot/microbiology , Acute Disease , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxacillin/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Staphylococcal Infections/surgery , Tetralogy of Fallot/surgery
19.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 11(6): 419-25, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19910799

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis of patients believed to be at a risk of developing infective endocarditis has been recently revisited with limited indications compared with the previous body of knowledge in use by the medical community. As a consequence, most of the healthcare specialists in cardiology and infectious diseases have doubts related to the enormous change that has been proposed. In this study, we report the results of an Italian consensus of experts in cardiology and infectious diseases, with the aim to offer a national document that illustrates the reasons for such a change through the review of the basis of infective endocarditis prophylaxis, the historical background, and the reasons for the change, providing practical conclusions and illustrating grey areas. METHODS: The main guidelines published on the topic of antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis were discussed as well as the risk of anaphylaxis. Overall, the group agreed that the evidence for prophylaxis is weak and limited to few case-control studies, expert opinion, clinical experience, and descriptive studies. RESULTS: The 'downgrading' of the indications for prophylaxis is mainly due to a cultural change and a more critical attitude towards available published data. Although the group acknowledge the critical view of the previously published guidelines, it seems to be more practical to consider the issue of prophylaxis without the evidence required by guidelines but rather as a consensus document based on the available data. CONCLUSION: Contemporary guidelines on infective endocarditis prophylaxis challenge previous recommendations based on a low level of evidence. The main recommendation of the study group is to underline that prophylaxis may often be based on adequate education without the administration of antibiotics, which only remains suggested, following the usual practice, in patients with heart diseases, when the risk of a complicated prognosis following infective endocarditis may be anticipated.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , Cardiology/trends , Endocarditis, Bacterial/prevention & control , Humans , Italy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk , Societies, Medical , Uncertainty
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...