A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.

An image-guided core-needle breast biopsy (IGCNBB) diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is often upgraded to invasive carcinoma (IC) after complete excision. When IC is identified after excision patients must be returned to the operating room for evaluation of their axillary nodes. We performed this study to identify histologic or mammographic features that would predict the presence of invasion when DCIS is documented by IGCNBB. Patients with an IGCNBB diagnosis of DCIS were identified from a prospective database. Imaging abnormalities were classified as either calcification only or mass with or without calcifications. IGCNBB specimens were reviewed to document nuclear grade and the presence of comedo-type necrosis, periductal fibrosis, and periductal inflammation. Patients were divided into two groups, DCIS and IC, on the basis of the final diagnosis after complete excision. From July 1993 through May 2000, 148 of 2995 (4.9%) IGCNBBs demonstrated DCIS; eight were excluded after pathologic review. Of the remaining 140 patients 36 (26%) demonstrated IC after complete excision. The presence of a mass on breast imaging was the only significant predictor of IC (P = 0.04). On the basis of the results of this study we now perform sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy at the initial surgical procedure for patients with an IGCNBB diagnosis of DCIS and an associated mass on breast imaging.

Biopsy technique has no impact on local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.

Image-guided core needle breast biopsy (IGCNBB) is an incisional biopsy technique that has been associated with tumor cell displacement. Theoretically tumor cell displacement may affect local recurrence rates in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We performed a study to determine if the biopsy method impacted local control rates following BCT. Patients with nonpalpable breast cancer (invasive and intraductal) diagnosed at our institution and treated with BCT between July 1993 and July 1996 were selected to provide a follow-up period in which the majority of local recurrences should be detected. Patients were divided into two groups based on their method of diagnosis. Group I patients were diagnosed by IGCNBB and group II patients were diagnosed by wire localized excisional breast biopsy (WLEBB). Factors potentially affecting local recurrence rates were retrospectively reviewed. Two hundred eleven patients were treated with BCT, 132 were diagnosed by IGCNBB and 79 by WLEBB. The two patient groups were similar when compared for prognostic factors and treatment. All patients' BCT included histologically negative margins. There were 4 (3.0%) local recurrences in Group I at a median follow-up of 44.4 months and 2 (2.5%) local recurrences in group II at a median follow-up of 50.1 months. This difference was not significant. Breast cancer patients diagnosed by IGCNBB can be treated by BCT with acceptable local control rates. Additional surveillance of our institutional experience and others' is mandatory to validate IGCNBB as the preferred biopsy method for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities.

The influence of young age and positive family history of breast cancer on the prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ treated by excision with or without radiation therapy or by mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Several recent studies have investigated the influence of family history on the progression of DCIS patients treated by tylectomy and radiation therapy. Since three treatment strategies have been used for DCIS at our institution, we evaluated the influence of family history and young age on outcome by treatment method. METHODS: Between 1/1/82 and 12/31/92, 128 patients were treated for DCIS by mastectomy (n = 50, 39%), tylectomy alone (n = 43, 34%), and tylectomy with radiation therapy (n = 35, 27%). Median follow-up is 8.7 years. Thirty-nine patients had a positive family history of breast cancer; 26 in a mother, sister, or daughter (first-degree relative); and 26 in a grandmother, aunt, or cousin (second-degree relative). Thirteen patients had a positive family history in both first- and second-degree relatives. RESULTS: Six women developed a recurrence in the treated breast; all of these were initially treated with tylectomy alone. There were no recurrences in the mastectomy group or the tylectomy patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy. Patients with a positive family history had a 10.3% local recurrence rate (LRR), vs. a 2.3% LRR in patients with a negative family history (p = 0.05). Four of 44 patients (9.1%) 50 years of age or younger recurred, compared to two of 84 patients (2.4%) over the age of 50 (p = 0.10). Fifteen patients had both a positive family history and were 50 years of age or younger. Among these women, the recurrence rate was 20%. Women in this group treated by lesionectomy alone had a LRR of 38% (3 of 8). CONCLUSION: The most important determinant of outcome was the selection of treatment modality, with all of the recurrences occurring in the tylectomy alone group. In addition to treatment method, a positive family history significantly influenced LRR in patients treated by tylectomy, especially in women 50 years of age or younger. These results suggest that DCIS patients, particularly premenopausal women with a positive family history, benefit from treatment of the entire breast, and raise concerns about treating patients with a possible genetic susceptibility to breast cancer with tylectomy alone.

Benign diagnosis by image-guided core-needle breast biopsy.

Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy (IGCNBB) is widely used to evaluate patients with abnormal mammograms; however, information is limited regarding the reliability of a benign diagnosis. The goal of this study was to demonstrate that a benign diagnosis obtained by IGCNBB is accurate and amenable to mammographic surveillance. Records of all patients evaluated by IGCNBB from July 1993 through July 1996 were reviewed. Biopsies were classified as malignant, atypical, or benign. All benign cases were followed by surveillance mammography beginning 6 months after IGCNBB. Of the 1110 patients evaluated by IGCNBB during the study period, 855 revealed benign pathology. A total of 728 of the 855 patients (85%) complied with the recommendation for surveillance mammography. A total of 196 IGCNBBs were classified as malignant; 59 cases were classified as atypical. The atypical cases were excluded from the statistical analysis. Only two patients have demonstrated carcinoma after a benign IGCNBB during the 2-year minimum follow-up period. The sensitivity and specificity of a benign result were 100.0 and 98.9 per cent, respectively. A benign diagnosis obtained by IGCNBB is accurate and therefore amenable to mammographic surveillance. The results of this study support IGCNBB as the preferred method of evaluating women with abnormal mammograms.

Advances in breast cancer detection with screening mammography.

Breast cancer is a leading cause of death among women in the United States, but good evidence equates early detection with reduction in breast cancer mortality. X-ray screening mammography remains the most sensitive noninvasive technique for detecting early tumors when women are asymptomatic and cancers may still be noninvasive. Limitations that reduce both sensitivity and specificity are inherent in all medical testing and mammography has been reported to miss 10%-15% of breast cancers. Federal standards, along with marked improvements in technology have led to improved regulation, inspection, and compliance requirements. Refinements continue to be made in film/screen combinations, but the ability to obtain the high contrast required to resolve fine structures with only minor density differences is limited by a narrow dynamic range. Recent technologic developments include Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) and Digital Mammography, which work on the principle that cancers cause specific patterns of abnormality and are immune to fatigue, illness, and distraction. The ImageChecker (R2 Technology, Inc, Los Altos, CA), currently the only FDA approved CAD system, was installed at the Breast Imaging Center of Ochsner and three comprehensive studies were performed by R2 Technology, Inc. The technology is promising.

Radial scar of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation in 22 cases.

Twenty-two cases were reviewed in which the diagnosis of radial scar (complex sclerosing lesion) of the breast was suspected preoperatively. At mammography, the lesions had a "black star" appearance with long, thin spicules radiating from a radiolucent central area. Excisional rather than core needle biopsy was recommended in all cases. In 13 of 22 cases, including one case of atypical ductal hyperplasia, the lesions proved benign at pathologic analysis. The remaining nine cases were malignant and included one case with a low-nuclear-grade cribriform and micropapillary ductal carcinoma in situ adjacent to the lesion. Results of this study confirm the previously reported association of atypical ductal hyperplasia and carcinoma with radial scar. Furthermore, they demonstrate that a mammographic finding suggestive of radial scar may represent a malignancy that mimics the typical imaging findings in these entities. In cases of mammographically suspected radial scar, all members of the management team as well as the patient should be made aware preoperatively of the potential for benign as well as malignant pathologic findings.

Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to evaluate one institution's experience with image-guided core-needle breast biopsy (IGCNBB) and compare the pathologic results with wire-localized excisional breast biopsy (WLEBB) for patients with positive cores and the mammographic surveillance results for patients with negative cores. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: IGCNBB is becoming a popular, minimally invasive alternative to WLEBB in the evaluation of patients with nonpalpable abnormalities. METHODS: This study includes all patients with nonpalpable breast imaging abnormalities evaluated by IGCNBB from July 1993 to February 1997. Patients with positive cores (atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ, or invasive carcinoma) were evaluated by WLEBB. Patients with negative cores (benign histology) were followed with a standard mammographic protocol. IGCNBB results were compared with WLEBB results to determine the sensitivity and specificity for each IGCNBB pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 1440 IGCNBBs performed during the study period, 1106 were classified as benign, and during surveillance follow-up only a single patient was demonstrated to have a carcinoma in the index part of the breast evaluated by IGCNBB (97.3% sensitivity, 99.7% specificity). IGCNBB demonstrated atypical hyperplasia in 72 patients, 5 of whom refused WLEBB. The remaining 67 patients were evaluated by WLEBB: nonmalignant findings were found in 31, carcinoma in situ was found in 25, and invasive carcinoma was found in 11 (100% sensitivity, 88.8% specificity). IGCNBB demonstrated carcinoma in situ in 84 patients; WLEBB confirmed carcinoma in situ in 54 and invasive carcinoma in 30 (65.4% sensitivity, 97.7% specificity). IGCNBB demonstrated invasive carcinoma in 178 patients. Three were lost to follow-up. On WLEBB, 173 of the remaining 175 had invasive carcinoma; the other 2 patients had carcinoma in situ (80.8% sensitivity, 99.8% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: An IGCNBB that demonstrates atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma in situ requires WLEBB to define the extent of breast pathology. Mammographic surveillance for a patient with a benign IGCNBB is supported by nearly 100% specificity. An IGCNBB diagnosis of invasive carcinoma is also associated with nearly 100% specificity; therefore, these patients can have definitive surgical therapy, including axillary dissection or mastectomy, without waiting for the pathologic results of a WLEBB. Based on the authors' findings, IGCNBB can safely replace WLEBB in evaluating patients with nonpalpable breast abnormalities.

A core breast biopsy diagnosis of invasive carcinoma allows for definitive surgical treatment planning.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed our image-guided core needle breast biopsy (IGCNBB) experience with patients diagnosed with invasive carcinoma (IC) to determine the accuracy of a core biopsy diagnosis of invasion and our ability to perform a single definitive cancer operation. METHODS: All IGCNBBs between July 1993 and July 1997 were reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with IC. Data included initial surgical treatment, surgical pathology, and subsequent surgical treatment. RESULTS: Of the 1,676 biopsies, invasive carcinoma was diagnosed in 208 with follow-up in 204 cases. Invasive carcinoma diagnosis was confirmed in 202 of 204 cases (99%). One hundred ninety-two patients had surgical treatment. Of these 192 patients, 173 (90%) could have achieved definitive surgical treatment with a single operation. CONCLUSIONS: An IGCNBB diagnosis of IC is accurate and allows for definitive breast cancer therapy. The potential impact on patient management is that a single operation can usually accomplish what traditionally has required at least two surgical procedures.

Appropriate management of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by stereotactic core needle breast biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy (SCNBB) is a minimally invasive technique used to sample nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. The optimal management of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed by SCNBB is unknown. We hypothesized that ADH diagnosed by SCNBB should be evaluated by excisional breast biopsy (EBB) because of the risk of identifying carcinoma in association with ADH that would be missed if a diagnostic sampling technique alone was utilized. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, a prospective diagnostic protocol was created which called for SCNBB instead of EBB for patients with mammographic abnormalities considered suspicious for malignancy. If ADH was noted on histologic evaluation of the cores, patients were advised to undergo an EBB. RESULTS: A review of the initial 900 patients evaluated by SCNBB yielded 39 patients (4.3%) with ADH detected by SCNBB. Thirty-six of these 39 patients agreed to proceed with EBB: 19 patients demonstrated benign findings including atypical ductal hyperplasia, 13 patients demonstrated noninvasive ductal carcinoma, and 4 patients had evidence of invasive carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: A 47% rate of detecting noninvasive or invasive breast carcinoma supports the hypothesis that ADH detected by a sampling technique, such as SCNBB, should be managed by EBB.

Core biopsy of breast lesions.

In patients with mammographically detected breast lesions, stereotactic-guided core biopsy was studied as an alternative to surgical biopsy. Fifty-two patients with a total of 58 mammographically detected suspicious lesions underwent stereotactic-guided core biopsy (average 4.7 cores per lesion) with a 14-G biopsy gun. The results were correlated with subsequent needle-localized surgical biopsy that was performed immediately after the core specimens were obtained. The core biopsy results correlated with the surgical biopsy in 54 of the 58 lesions (93% agreement), including correct identification of 14 malignancies. No false negative or false positive results occurred using core biopsy to detect cancer. These findings suggest stereotactic-guided core biopsy is an accurate method and an acceptable alternative to needle localization in the diagnosis of mammographically suspicious nonpalpable breast lesions.