Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Laryngoscope ; 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666491

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Systematically review of literature characterizing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of surgery in pediatric otitis media (OM) patients, and meta-analysis of studies using the OM-6 questionnaire. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of literature of studies evaluating HRQoL outcomes for OM patients managed by surgery. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-length articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS criteria and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. RESULTS: The search yielded 1272 studies, 50 underwent full-text review and 23 met inclusion criteria. Non-randomized studies were of moderate to good quality, while randomized trials had a high risk of bias. Age ranged from 6 months to 15 years. Race and socioeconomic factors were inconsistently reported. There were 11 HRQoL outcome measure instruments of which four were disease-specific. Eleven studies used OM-6 and nine were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of five studies showed a mean OM-6 change of 1.79 (95% CI: 1.53-2.06; 95% PI: 0.92-2.67; I2 = 68%) 4-6 weeks after surgery; a mean change of 1.87 (95% CI: 1.15-2.58; 98%) after 6 months across two studies; and a mean change of 1.64 (1.02 to 2.27; -6.35 to 9.64; 98%) after 9-13 months across three studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is no consistency in HRQoL instruments used to evaluate pediatric OM surgery outcomes in current literature with few RCTs. Meta-analysis showed a clinically significant large improvement in HRQoL 4-6 weeks after tympanostomy tube placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

2.
JBI Evid Synth ; 20(1): 238-248, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34750302

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and synthesize existing research on the economic impact of diabetes self-management education and support. INTRODUCTION: Diabetes self-management education and support is an essential component of diabetes care, yet it continues to be underutilized. A gap exists regarding the true measured economic impact of this intervention. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider studies that report the measured economic impact and health care utilization of diabetes self-management education and support for persons with diabetes or their caregivers. The inclusion criteria are as follows: quantitative studies providing measured data on the economic outcomes and health care utilization of diabetes self-management education and support interventions that include at least one of the Association for Diabetes Care and Education Specialists Seven Self-Care Behaviors. METHODS: The review will search the following databases: MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Daily and Versions; Embase; Scopus; CINAHL; ERIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Additionally, a search of gray literature will be performed using Google Scholar. Date limitations will be from January 2006 to May 2020. Two members of the research team will independently screen abstracts and full texts, and extract data. The screening process will be described using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles will be assessed for risk of bias using the JBI critical appraisal tools. Data will be narratively summarized. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020166743).


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Self-Management , Caregivers , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Health Behavior , Humans , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Systematic Reviews as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...