ABSTRACT
The results of a multicentric review are reported using the extensimetric instrumentation applied to the Ilizarov device. This clinical trial the follows same theoretical and experimental preliminary studies, outlines the advantages and current limits of the method, and sets the bases for further clinical and experimental research.
Subject(s)
External Fixators , Fracture Healing/physiology , Ilizarov Technique/instrumentation , Leg Length Inequality/surgery , Analog-Digital Conversion , Equipment Design , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fractures, Ununited/surgery , Gait/physiology , Humans , Ilizarov Technique/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Tibia/abnormalities , Tibia/surgery , Tibial Fractures/surgeryABSTRACT
Results of reimplanted total hip prostheses and resection arthroplasty were compared. Using the Iowa hip rating scale, the reimplanted prostheses population was rated higher for function, gait, and absence of deformity, however, the resection arthroplasty population rated better in freedom from pain. Radiographic findings in the reimplanted prostheses population included radiolucent lines around the cement, loosening, and cortex bone stock loss. These findings cause concern for the future of these implants. Repair and remodeling of the bone lesions were observed in resection arthroplasties. It was concluded that if healing of infection is achieved or if resection is performed for mechanical failure, the results may be considered permanent.
