ABSTRACT
On behalf of the Medical/Psychological Pain Associations, Pain Patients Alliance and the Professional Association of Pain Physicians and Psychologists, the Joint Commission of Professional Societies and Organizations for Quality in Pain Medicine, working in close collaboration with the respective presidents, has developed verifiable structural and process-related criteria for the classification of medical and psychological pain treatment facilities in Germany. Based on the established system of graded care in Germany and on existing qualifications, these criteria also argue for the introduction of a basic qualification in pain medicine. In addition to the first-ever comprehensive description of psychological pain facilities, the criteria presented can be used to classify five different levels of pain facilities, from basic pain management facilities, to specialized institutions, to the Centre for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine. The recommendations offer binding and verifiable criteria for quality assurance in pain medicine and improved pain treatment.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/classification , Chronic Pain/therapy , National Health Programs/classification , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Pain Clinics/classification , Pain Clinics/organization & administration , Pain Management/classification , Quality Assurance, Health Care/classification , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Germany , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral CollaborationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether or not the combination of tilidin and tilidin retard as oral patient-controlled analgesia provide a suitable pain management in patients after uncomplicated myocardial revascularization. METHODS: We conducted a randomised phase IV study to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia with tilidin and tilidin retard. Patients with a baseline tilidin retard and tilidin liquid demand medication (group B, 42 patients) were compared with a base line paracetamol and tramadol-HCl liquid demand medication (group A, 44 patients). All patients received the first dose of study medication at the second postoperative day after evaluation of the individual pain score using NRS (numeric rating scale). RESULTS: Pain relief in group B was significantly better only at the second postoperative day (NRS 1,8 compared to 3,3 in group A), associated with tolerable side effects and comfortable handling. CONCLUSION: The combination of sustained release with immediate release drugs as a patient controlled analgesia provides suitable and comfortable analgesia after myocardial bypass surgery.
