Efficacy Comparison of an Automated Growth-Based System and Plate-Count Method on the Detection of Yeasts and Molds in Personal Care Products.

OBJECTIVE: The present investigation studies the efficacy of an automated growth-based system for a quantitative determination of Candida albicans and Aspergillus brasiliensis in several personal care products. The main purpose of this validation study was to prove that the alternative method's entire performance is not inferior to the conventional pour-plate method for a quantitative determination of yeasts and molds. Thus, a performance equivalence was established in accordance with the United Stated Pharmacopeia (USP-NF) Validation of Alternative Microbiological Methods ˂1223˃. METHODS: C. albicans and A. brasiliensis were pooled to use as inoculum (equivalent to 1.0 × 108 CFU/mL) in the suitability of the method test. PCP's preservatives were chemically neutralized leading to the yeast and mold recovery by means of the alternative microbiological method (AMM) and the pour-plate method. A correlation curve was generated for each PCP by plotting DTs relative to the corresponding log CFU values. RESULTS: Thirty PCPs have been tested for quantification of yeasts and molds using an AMM. An equivalence of results was made through the construction of correlation curves that allowed the establishment of numerically equivalent results between the enumeration data from the reference method (CFU) and the alternative method (Detection times, DTs). Thus, following the guidelines of USP Ch.1223, essential validation parameters were tested, such as equivalence of results (Correlation coeficient, CC >0.95), linearity (R2 >0.9025), accuracy (% recovery >70%), operating range, precision (CV <35%), ruggedness (one-way ANOVA, P > 0.05), specificity, LOD, and LOQ. CONCLUSION: It was shown that all the test results obtained from the alternative method were in statistical agreement with the standard plate-count method (PCM). Thus, this new technology was found to meet all the validation criteria needed to be considered for an alternative method for yeast and mold quantification in the PCPs tested. HIGHLIGHTS: In accordance with the United Stated Pharmacopeia (USP-NF) Validation of Alternative Microbiological Methods ˂1223˃, the implementation of alternative methods can offer benefits in execution and automation while improving accuracy, sensitivity, and precision and reduce the microbiological process time compared to the traditional ones.

Validation of a Rapid Microbiological Method for the Detection and Quantification of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex in an Antacid Oral Suspension.

BACKGROUND: Despite the broad adoption of Soleris® technology in the food industry as semiquantitative method, it is almost completely unexplored in the pharmaceutical industry as a quantitative method for quantification of Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc). OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of an automated growth-based system for a quantitative determination of the Bcc in an antacid oral suspension was studied. The main purpose of this validation study was to prove that the alternative method's entire performance is not inferior to the conventional method for a quantitative determination of Bcc. METHOD: The antacid oral suspension's preservatives were neutralized, leading to the Burkholderia complex's recovery by means of the alternative method and the reference method. A calibration curve was generated for each strain by plotting DTs relative to the corresponding log CFU values. An equivalence of results was done through the construction of calibration curves that allowed the establishment of numerically equivalent results between the enumeration data from the reference method and the alternative method. RESULTS: Thus following the guidelines of USP, essential validation parameters were shown, such as equivalence of results (CC >0.95), linearity (R2 >0.9025), accuracy (% recovery >70%), operating range, precision and ruggedness (DS <5 and CV <35%), specificity (inclusivity and exclusivity), limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ). CONCLUSIONS: It was shown that all the test results obtained from the alternative method were in statistical agreement with the standard method. Thus this new technology was found to meet all the validation criteria needed to be considered as an alternative method for the quantification of the Burkholderia complex in the antacid oral suspension tested. HIGHLIGHTS: As outlined in USP chapter <1223> and demonstrated in this research the implementation of alternative methods can offer benefits in execution and automation while improving accuracy, sensitivity, and precision and can reduce the microbiological process time compared to the traditional ones.

Performance Equivalence and Validation of a Rapid Microbiological Method for Detection and Quantification of Yeast and Mold in an Antacid Oral Suspension.

Alternative and rapid microbiological methods can be effective replacements for more traditional plating approaches for ensuring quality and safety in the pharmaceutical industry. This article compares the efficacy of the Soleris automated method and the traditional plate-count method for the quantitative detection of yeasts and molds at three different microbial bioburden levels. Validation testing was carried out using an antacid oral suspension (aluminum hydroxide 4% + magnesium hydroxide 4% + simethicone 0.4%). Equivalence of data between detection time and colony-forming units was established for both the alternative and the conventional methodologies. Using probability of detection, linear Poisson regression, Fisher's test, and multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), all results from the rapid method were shown to be in statistical agreement with the those of the reference plating procedures. The limits of detection and quantification were statistically similar for both methods (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05), showing that the alternative method is not inferior in performance to the reference method. Essential validation parameters such as precision (standard deviation <5, coefficient of variance <35%), accuracy (>70%), linearity (R2 >0.9025), ruggedness (ANOVA, P < 0.05), operative range, and specificity were determined. It was shown that all the test results obtained using the alternative method were in statistical agreement with the those of the standard plate-count method. Thus, this new technology was found to meet all the validation criteria needed to be considered as an alternative method for yeast and mold quantification in the antacid oral suspension tested. However, taking into account that the present validation was carried out utilizing A. brasiliensis and C. albicans as suitable models for yeasts and molds and with an antacid oral suspension as a pharmaceutical matrix, further investigation will be required to qualify Soleris technology for other environmental isolates and recovery of these isolates from production batches.