Nutrition therapy in intensive care unit setting: what can be learned from a 6 months survey in a large academic hospital?

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition in Intensive Care Unit patients has been associated with worse clinical outcomes such as mortality and length of stay (LOS) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and nutritional status of Intensive Care Unit patients in particular seemed to be a significant predictor of mortality. Promptness of clinical nutrition administration is a key of nutritional support whenever volitional intake is unfeasible. Early enteral nutrition is associated with better clinical outcomes (reduced complications, LOS in ICU and in Hospital). The aim of this study is to investigate the nutrition therapy management in a large Academic Hospital, evaluating its effects on mortality and LOS in ICU and in the Hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected retrospectively from clinical records. Six physicians were trained on the data collection protocol and they reviewed every clinical record of patients included in the survey. METHODS: Data of 426 patients admitted to ICUs between November 2016, 1st and April 2017, 30th were collected. A multivariate logistic adjusted regression, with backward variables selection method, was performed in order to identify predictors of enteral and parenteral nutrition conducted within 48 hours after admission to the ICU. The relation between medical nutrition therapy, mortality and LOS in ICU and in the Hospital were also evaluated. RESULTS: Patients were given prompt parenteral and enteral nutrition in 25.12% and 27.46% of cases, respectively. No association was found between medical nutrition therapy and ICU or hospital mortality. Predictors of early enteral nutrition were type of admission and surgery before admission; early parenteral nutrition predictors were gender, ICU (A vs B), impaired immunity status and Central Venous Catheter presence at admission. CONCLUSIONS: Our study stresses the need of monitoring nutrition prescribing behaviors in acute hospitals in order to better set up tailored interventions to standardize clinicians' practices and to focus on specific training targets.

Assessment of the impact of clinical recommendations on antibiotic use for CAP and HCAP: results from an implementation program in an Academic Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Local guidelines and recommendations to treat common infectious diseases are a cornerstone of most Antimicrobial Stewardship programs. The evaluation of the adherence to guidelines is an effective quality measure of the programs themselves; the proposed evaluation model aimed at examining antibiotic treatment for pneumonia. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective pre-post intervention study was conducted in a North-Eastern Italian Academic Hospital. METHODS: 231 patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia and 95 with Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia were divided into pre- and post-intervention groups (188 and 138, respectively). A course and a pocket summary of Pneumonia Regional Recommendations were the stewardship activities adopted. The compliance degree of prescriptions with Regional Recommendations was tested for drug(s), dosage and duration of treatment in both groups for Community-Acquired and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia and a comparison with International guidelines was performed. RESULTS: A significant improvement in the compliance with Regional Recommendations for the variable drug emerged for Community-Acquired (38.8% vs 52.2%), but not for Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia; no significant variation in compliance was registered for dosage and duration of treatment. The significant decrease in consumption of levofloxacin showed the positive impact of the Regional Antimicrobial Stewardship programs. A high level of adherence to International Guidelines for the variable drug for Community-Acquired Pneumonia was found in both groups (75.5% and 77.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted that room for improvement in antibiotic prescription in Community-Acquired and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia currently remains. New strategies for a better use of the adopted tools and definition of new antimicrobial stewardship initiatives are needed to improve compliance to Regional Recommendations.

Monitoring healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use at regional level through repeated point prevalence surveys: what can be learnt?

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) surveillance is an essential part of any infection prevention and control programme. Repeated point prevalence surveys (PPSs) according to European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) protocol have been implemented in all Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG) region (Italy) acute hospitals to reduce and control HAIs. AIM: Using the repeated PPSs within a regional-healthcare system (RHS) to promote and evaluate infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes. METHODS: The standard versions of the ECDC PPS protocols were used in all four surveys (2011, 2013, 2015, 2017). All RHS public and private accredited hospitals were involved within the 'safe care network' programme. FINDINGS: The numbers of surveyed patients in the four PPSs were 3172, 3253, 2969 and 3036, respectively. Prevalence of HAIs and antimicrobial use (AU) decreased significantly from 2011: HAIs (P<0.05) 7.1%, 6.3%, 5.5%, 5.8% and AU (P<0.01) 40.4%, 39.2%, 36.0%, 37.2%, respectively. The appropriateness of duration of surgical prophylaxis increased significantly (<24 h increased through surveys related to one in 2011: odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29, 0.92-1.81; 1.95, 1.31-2.91; 1.78, 1.20-2.64, respectively). The most frequently detected HAIs were: bloodstream, urinary tract, pneumonia and surgical site (more than the 70% of HAIs in each PPS). CONCLUSION: The FVG regional approach to HAIs and AU surveillance was able to contribute to reduce prevalence over a 7-year period. Furthermore, it was able to keep hospital attention on HAIs and AU through the years and to guarantee a standardized and comparable evaluation of HAIs and AU burden in all RHS hospitals, as well as impacting on HAIs and AU regional programmes.