The accuracy of a portable sleep monitor to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea in adolescent patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of portable-monitor (PM) sleep testing in children is not well understood. While most studies have evaluated PM in a lab setting, the utility of PM in the home environment is relatively unknown. We sought to determine whether home PM accurately diagnoses obstructive sleep apnea in adolescents and to assess patient satisfaction with home PM sleep testing. METHODS: We evaluated adolescents (age 12-18 years) with suspected obstructive sleep apnea using a PM device. In addition to in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG), all participants had PM testing performed twice, once in their home and once concurrent to in-laboratory PSG. PM was compared to PSG using 2 primary outcomes: the apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen desaturation index. All participants were approached for interview to evaluate their experience with PM sleep testing. RESULTS: Twenty adolescents participated. Bland-Altman analysis comparing the apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen desaturation index determined by home or in-laboratory PM to in-laboratory PSG revealed mostly agreement; however, some deviations were observed when either parameter was markedly increased. While PM testing tended to underestimate the apnea-hypopnea index, the diagnostic agreement between home PM and PSG was 80% (by the White-Westbrook method). Most preferred PM to PSG and found PM easy to very easy to set up. CONCLUSIONS: In a small cohort of adolescents, our study supports the application of home PM in the diagnosis of suspected obstructive sleep apnea. Until studies implementing PM using larger cohorts become readily available, the findings from this preliminary study could contribute to adolescents receiving sleep apnea therapy more promptly. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT03748771. At the time of issue publication, this registration is not publicly available because the trial includes a device that is not approved or cleared for use in pediatric populations. Once the device is FDA cleared, the registration will become public.

Findings of routine nocturnal polysomnography in children with Down syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at risk for sleep disorders including; obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although OSA is diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG), the practicality of PSG in DS is questionable. Further, OSA treatment efficacy in DS is largely unknown given the challenges of PSG. Our aims were to review (i) the feasibility of PSG, and (ii) the efficacy (improvement in obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI)) of OSA treatment using follow-up PSG in DS. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients aged <21 years with DS who underwent PSG from October 2016 to June 2019. Successful PSG was determined using total sleep time (TST). PSG following treatment with adenotonsillectomy (AT) or positive airway pressure (PAP) was evaluated and compared to pre-treatment. RESULTS: Among 248 patients with DS, only 11(4.4%) had unsuccessful PSG (TST<1h). Of the 237 successful studies (age: 7.9 ± 0.3y), average TST and sleep efficiency was 5.6 ± 0.1h and 79.5 ± 1.3%. 41 had post-AT PSG and 11(27%) achieved OSA cure (OAHI<2) with all demonstrating improved SE (p = 0.01) and OAHI (p = 0.0003). Multivariate analysis revealed only age was predictive (p = 0.003) of residual OSA post-AT. Of 24 children who underwent PAP titration, 20(83%) tolerated titration with improved OAHI (p = 0.01), however, no significant improvements in SE were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of DS children, PSG was well tolerated. Following AT or PAP therapy, post treatment PSG confirmed efficacy, although residual OSA was identified. PSG is thus both feasible and useful in identifying OSA, OSA treatment response and should guide in decision making in children with DS.