ABSTRACT
Following the withdrawal of paraquat, diquat (DQ) has emerged as the predominant herbicide. When people come into contact with or ingest DQ, may lead to poisoning and potentially fatal outcomes. Reports suggest that the mortality of DQ poisoning can be as high as 50%. DQ poisoning can be categorized as mild, moderate to severe or fulminant. In cases of fulminant poisoning, victims often succumb to multiple organ failure within 48 h. This presents a significant challenge in the clinical management. Scholars have discovered that oxidative stress, inflammatory injury, and cell apoptosis play crucial roles in the DQ poisoning. However, the underlying connection of the extensive organ damage remains unknown. The abnormal function and activity of endothelial cells (EC) should play a crucial role in tissue damage caused by DQ due to rich microcirculation and high sensitivity to perfusion in the vulnerable organs. However, reports on DQ-induced EC injury is rare. We made a preliminary discovery-the presence of severe vascular endothelial damage in the kidneys and lungs affected by DQ. Therefore, we hypothesize that DQ poisoning may be attributed to EC damage, ultimately resulting in multiple organ failure.
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Vascular complications associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) increase the in-hospital mortality. Perforation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) cannulation and subsequent emergency management prior to vascular surgery has rarely been reported. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 72-year-old female was diagnosed with IVC perforation caused by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation. DIAGNOSES: Abdominal computed tomography venography with 3D reconstruction confirmed that the cannula tip had perforated the abdominal cavity from the conjunction of the iliac vein and IVC. As a result, the patient was diagnosed with inferior vena cava perforation. INTERVENTIONS: Attempts to reposition the dislocated cannula using digital subtraction angiography were unsuccessful. However, we found that ECMO could maintain a stable blood flow; therefore, we decided to keep ECMO running, and to minimize blood loss from the puncture site, we ensured adequate blood transfusion while operating V-V ECMO. Subsequently, emergency laparotomy was performed to fix the vascular lesion, and we established a new V-V ECMO circuit through cannulation of the bilateral internal jugular veins. OUTCOMES: In the case of confirmed V-V ECMO-related vascular perforation of the IVC, it is crucial to continue ECMO device operation to maintain negative pressure in the IVC and position the dislocated catheter to block the perforation site, effectively controlling bleeding. Therefore, emergency laparotomy should be promptly performed for vascular repair. Fortunately, the patient recovered successfully and was subsequently discharged. LESSONS: This case highlights several important lessons: When advancing a cannula, in this case, it is essential to first identify the guidewire placement to ensure proper guidance; In the event of a confirmed V-V ECMO-related vascular perforation of the IVC, maintaining negative pressure in the IVC through continued ECMO device operation and positioning the dislocated catheter to block the perforation site are crucial steps to control bleeding prior to emergency open vascular repair; After undergoing vascular repair, if ECMO support is still necessary, it is advisable to opt for a catheterization strategy that avoids previously repaired blood vessels.
Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Female , Humans , Aged , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Vena Cava, Inferior/surgery , Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheterization/methods , Cannula , CathetersABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgical technology has been widely introduced and applied in various fields of surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term oncological and urogenital functional outcomes following laparoscopic/robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We identified studies that compared oncological and functional outcomes following laparoscopic TME (LTME) and robotic TME (RTME) for treatment of rectal cancer over the past 16 years. Data related to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) were subjected to meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: There was no difference in long-term OS and DFS in the pooled data. Compared with LTME, there were significant differences in the score of IPSS at 3, 6 and 12 months for RTME, in the pooled data for male patients. There were significant differences in IIEF score for male patients at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with LTME, RTME has better preservation of urinary and sexual functions and comparable long-term oncological outcome in rectal cancer.
