Using multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography to detect and delineate the gross tumour volume of intraprostatic lesions - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation therapy is used frequently for patients with prostate cancer. Dose escalation to intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) has been shown to improve oncologic outcomes, without increasing toxicity. Both multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PSMA PET can be used to identify IPLs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to determine the ability of mpMRI, PSMA PET and their combination to detect IPLs prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) as correlated with the histology. Trials included patients that had mpMRI, PSMA PET, or both, prior to RP. The quality of the histopathological-radiological co-registration was assessed as high or low for each study. Recorded outcomes include sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). A meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate model to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity for each imaging modality. This systematic review was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42023389092). RESULTS: Altogether, 42 studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 20 could be included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (95 % CI), specificity (95 % CI) and AUROC for mpMRI (n = 13 studies) were 64.7 % (50.2 % - 76.9 %), 86.4 % (79.7 % - 91.1 %), and 0.852; the pooled outcomes for PSMA PET (n = 12) were 75.7 % (64.0 % - 84.5 %), 87.1 % (80.2 % - 91.9 %), and 0.889; for their combination (n = 5), the pooled outcomes were 70.3 % (64.1 % - 75.9 %), 81.9 % (71.9 % - 88.8 %), and 0.796. When reviewing studies with a high-quality histopathological-radiological co-registration, IPL delineation recommendations varied by study and the imaging modality used. CONCLUSION: All of mpMRI, PSMA PET or their combination were found to have very good diagnostic outcomes for detecting IPLs. Recommendations for delineating IPLs varied based on the imaging modalities used and between research groups. Consensus guidelines for IPL delineation would help with creating consistency for focal boost radiation treatments in future studies.

CT Rendering and Radiomic Analysis in Post-Chemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer to Anticipate Difficulties for Young Surgeons.

Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in non-seminomatous germ-cell tumor (NSTGCTs) is a complex procedure. We evaluated whether 3D computed tomography (CT) rendering and their radiomic analysis help predict resectability by junior surgeons. The ambispective analysis was performed between 2016-2021. A prospective group (A) of 30 patients undergoing CT was segmented using the 3D Slicer software while a retrospective group (B) of 30 patients was evaluated with conventional CT (without 3D reconstruction). CatFisher's exact test showed a p-value of 0.13 for group A and 1.0 for Group B. The difference between the proportion test showed a p-value of 0.009149 (IC 0.1-0.63). The proportion of the correct classification showed a p-value of 0.645 (IC 0.55-0.87) for A, and 0.275 (IC 0.11-0.43) for Group B. Furthermore, 13 shape features were extracted: elongation, flatness, volume, sphericity, and surface area, among others. Performing a logistic regression with the entire dataset, n = 60, the results were: Accuracy: 0.7 and Precision: 0.65. Using n = 30 randomly chosen, the best result obtained was Accuracy: 0.73 and Precision: 0.83, with a p-value: 0.025 for Fisher's exact test. In conclusion, the results showed a significant difference in the prediction of resectability with conventional CT versus 3D reconstruction by junior surgeons versus experienced surgeons. Radiomic features used to elaborate an artificial intelligence model improve the prediction of resectability. The proposed model could be of great support in a university hospital, allowing it to plan the surgery and to anticipate complications.

Impact of COVID-19 on surgical residency training programs in Mexico City: The third victim of the pandemic. A resident's perspective.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the perceptions of the impact of health-care disruption due to COVID-19 on the academic training and skills of surgical trainees. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We developed a 32-question survey assessing the clinical and surgical impact of COVID-19 on surgical training programs and proposals to compensate for the decrease in surgical education. We got 453 responses of surgical trainees in Mexico City. RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of the respondents answered that their centers had converted to the exclusive attention of COVID-19 patients. Ninety-five percent reported a decrease in surgical skills learning and 91.8% reported a decrease to clinical exposure. On proposals, 75.6% reported that it is essential to take the necessary measures to recover the clinical and surgical milestones lost. In the binary logistic regression analysis, we found that the postgraduate year (≥ PG-Y3) was statistically significant factor (p ≤ 0.000) related to a favorable opinion to developing an academic contingency plan and postponing the end of the academic residency year. CONCLUSION: More than 90% of the survey respondents reported having been affected by COVID-19 mitigation strategies. Our data calls for urgent training adjustments by hospital and university program leaders to mitigate downstream educational repercussions.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar las percepciones del impacto de la interrupción de la atención médica por COVID-19 en la formación académica y las habilidades de los residentes quirúrgicos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos una encuesta de 32 preguntas, evaluando el impacto clínico y quirúrgico del COVID-19 en los programas de entrenamiento quirúrgico y propuestas para compensar la disminución de la educación quirúrgica. Obtuvimos 453 respuestas de residentes quirúrgicos en la Ciudad de México. RESULTADOS: El 66% respondió que sus centros se convirtieron en atención exclusiva de pacientes con COVID-19. El 95% presentó una disminución en el aprendizaje de habilidades quirúrgicas y el 91. 8% presentó una disminución de la exposición clínica. El 75.6% consideró fundamental tomar las medidas necesarias para recuperar las destrezas clínicas perdidas. En el análisis de regresión logística binaria, encontramos que el año de posgrado (> PG-Y3) fue un factor estadísticamente significativo (p <0,000) relacionado con una opinión favorable para desarrollar un plan de contingencia académica y posponer el final del año de residencia académica. CONCLUSIÓN: Más del 90% de los encuestados fueron afectados por las estrategias de mitigación de COVID-19. Nuestros datos exigen ajustes urgentes por parte de los líderes de programas de hospitales y universidades para mitigar las repercusiones educativas posteriores.

[Long-term renal function in patients with renal-cell carcinoma treated surgically: comparison between radical and partial nephrectomy]. / Función renal a largo plazo en pacientes con cáncer de células renales tratados quirúrgicamente: comparación entre nefrectomía radical y parcial.

PURPOSE: To compare the renal function (RF) in patients with renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) treated by radical (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) and to assess the impact of the two surgical techniques in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the database of patients with renal tumors treated surgically. RF was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively and compared between both techniques. GFR was estimated using CKD-EPI formula. Statistical analysis included X2, Student's t and Friedman tests and a method of logistic regression (multivariate analysis). RESULTS: 223 patients with RCC, who underwent surgery between 1981 and 2010, had complete information. The mean follow-up was 67.6 +/- 49.6 months. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the RN (n = 196) and PN (N = 27) groups. After 6 months a GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was detected in 63% vs. 29% (p = 0.0007), after 12 months in 64% vs. 33% (p = 0.002) and after 60 months in 53% vs. 40% (p = 0.2) of the patients in RN and PN groups, respectively. The absolute decrease in GFR was 22% after RN and 17% after PN. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative GFR and type of surgery were associated with an impairment of RF after 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: RN results in a more important impairment of RF after 6 and 12 months. At 60 months, patients treated with PN maintain a mean GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.