Prognostic assessment of valvular surgery in active infective endocarditis: multicentric nationwide validation of a new score developed from a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Several risk prediction models have been developed to estimate the risk of mortality after valve surgery for active infective endocarditis (IE), but few external validations have been conducted to assess their accuracy. We previously developed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of IE-specific factors for the in-hospital mortality rate after IE valve surgery, whose obtained pooled estimations were the basis for the development of a new score (APORTEI). The aim of the present study was to assess its prognostic accuracy in a nationwide cohort. METHODS: We analysed the prognostic utility of the APORTEI score using patient-level data from a multicentric national cohort. Patients who underwent surgery for active IE between 2008 and 2018 were included. Discrimination was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the calibration was assessed using the calibration slope and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Agreement between the APORTEI and the EuroSCORE I was also analysed by Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), the Bland-Altman agreement analysis and a scatterplot graph. RESULTS: The 11 variables that comprised the APORTEI score were analysed in the sample. The APORTEI score was calculated in 1338 patients. The overall observed surgical mortality rate was 25.56%. The score demonstrated adequate discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.72-0.77) and calibration (calibration slope = 1.03; Hosmer-Lemeshow test P = 0.389). We found a lack of agreement between the APORTEI and EuroSCORE I (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The APORTEI score, developed from a systematic review and meta-analysis, showed an adequate estimation of the risk of mortality after IE valve surgery in a nationwide cohort.

Which type of valve should we use in tricuspid position? Long-term comparison between mechanical and biological valves.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is much less common than aortic or mitral valve replacement, since repair is almost always preferable. Prosthetic tricuspid valves are associated with high mortality and morbidity, mostly due to thrombotic or hemorrhagic events. Nevertheless, there is lack of evidence of which is the optimal type of valve (biological versus mechanical) in tricuspid position. METHODS: We analyzed all the patients who underwent TVR in our Institution, from 2005 to 2015. Patient baseline characteristics were recorded (such as functional class, previous cardiac surgery, right ventricular dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension), and a clinical long-term follow-up was conducted. We compared the outcomes between mechanical and biological prostheses: in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, need for reintervention and adverse events (such as stroke or valve thrombosis). RESULTS: During the study period 120 tricuspid prosthetic valves were implanted in 111 patients. 81 of them (67.5%) were bioprostheses, and 39 (32.5%) mechanical valves. 73 patients (60.8%) had undergone a previous cardiac surgery (28.4% had previous tricuspid surgery). Most of the patients (87.1%) were in high functional class (grade III-IV of the NYHA classification), and 85% had moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension. Mean logistic EuroSCORE I was 14.80%. Only 37 cases were isolated TVR (30.6%), as most of the cases were TVR concomitant to mitral valve replacement. In-hospital mortality was 21.7%, and during the follow-up (mean follow-up of 7 years) reached 37.5%. Three mechanical tricuspid valves (7.7%) had to be replaced due to thrombosis, while 7 biological valves (8.6%) had to be replaced due to valve deterioration. The incidence of stroke was 7.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Tricuspid valve replacement is an infrequent procedure with a high incidence of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Biological or mechanical valves have similar mortality, and a reasonably low incidence of need for reintervention due to thrombosis or valve deterioration.

Rotura iatrogénica de electrodos de marcapasos permanente en la realización de esternotomía media: presentación de un caso / Iatrogenic rupture of permanent pacemaker electrodes while performing a median sternotomy: a case report

RESUMEN La esternotomía media continúa siendo el gold-standart de abordaje quirúrgico en cirugía cardiaca. Aún realizada correctamente, la apertura media del esternón presenta complicaciones en el 1-5% de los casos que varían en su gravedad desde la infección de la herida quirúrgica a la lesión de estructuras intratorácicas. En el presente estudio se describe un caso de rotura de electrodos de marcapasos tras esternotomía media por retracción y fibrosis del tronco venoso braquiocefálico. Debido a la ausencia de artículos semejantes en la literatura y al extendido empleo de la esternotomía en pacientes portadores de marcapasos permanente, se pretende disminuir las lesiones asociadas mediante la publicación de un infrecuente caso de lesión iatrogénica durante la apertura esternal, con escasos precedentes en la literatura publicada hasta la fecha. MÉD.UIS. 2016;29(3):95-9.

ABSTRACT Median sternotomy is still the gold-standard surgical approach in cardiac surgery. Even correctly performed, the sternum median opening presents complications in an incidence of 1-5% of cases comprising in severity from infection of the surgical wound to the injury of intrathoracic structures. We describe a case in which the pacemaker leads were broken after median sternotomy because of the brachiocephalic vein fibrosis. Due to the absence of similar items in the literature and the widespread use of sternotomy in patients with permanent pacemakers, we intended to reduce associated injuries by posting a rare case of iatrogenic injury during sternal opening with few precedents in the literature. MÉD.UIS. 2016;29(3):95-9.

Selección del mejor lugar de estimulación tras cirugía cardiaca evaluando la asincronía con strain tras diferentes estimulaciones / Selecting the best site for pacing leads after cardiac surgery by evaluating the asynchrony of myocardial deformation observed with different pacing sites

Introducción y objetivos. Implantar electrodos transitorios en ventrículo derecho (VD) tras cirugía cardiaca es habitual. El objetivo es estudiar en pacientes intervenidos el efecto de la estimulación en diferentes localizaciones ventriculares en la sincronía, analizando la deformación miocárdica (strain), y en la eficacia cardiaca. Métodos. En 19 pacientes se midió la asincronía interventricular (diferencia en el tiempo al comienzo del strain entre VD y ventrículo izquierdo [VI]: TE DI) y la intraventricular (desviación estándar [TE DE] y máxima diferencia en el tiempo de comienzo del strain en las seis caras del VI [TE MD]). Estas estimaciones y el gasto cardiaco (GC) mediante Doppler se determinaron tras la estimulación en VD en tres diferentes segmentos del VI. Resultados. La estimulación en VD fue la que más aumentó los parámetros de asincronía respecto al estudio basal: TE DI, 59,8 ± 40,5 frente a 28,23 ± 56,9 ms (p = 0,002); TE DE, 53,2 ± 34,4 frente a 36,6 ± 34,9 ms (p = 0,007); TE MD, 135,3 ± 82,9 frente a 90,5 ± 87,4 ms (p = 0,007). La estimulación en VI produjo menos asincronía (estimulación en segmento anterior del VI: TE DI, 17,2 ± 53,8 ms; TE DE, 35,8 ± 17,9 ms; TE MD, 91,3 ± 45,2 ms (sin significación estadística respecto a basal). El GC tras la estimulación en VD fue menor que tras estimulación en la cara anterior del VI: 4,36 ± 1 frente a 4,7 ± 1 (p = 0,001). Conclusiones. La estimulación en VI produce menos asincronía que en VD. Asimismo, la estimulación en la cara anterior del VI consigue mayor GC que la estimulación en VD. Estos datos indican que se debería modificar la localización de los electrodos transitorios tras cirugía cardiaca (AU)

Introduction and objectives. After cardiac surgery, temporary pacing leads are routinely implanted in the right ventricle (RV). The objective was to investigate the effect of different ventricular pacing locations on cardiac synchrony (by evaluating myocardial deformation, or strain) and efficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods. Interventricular asynchrony (i.e. the difference in the time of onset of deformation between right and left ventricles; TE-R/L) and intraventricular asynchrony (i.e. the standard deviation and maximum difference in the time of onset of deformation in six segments of the left ventricle [LV]; TE-SD and TE-MD, respectively) were assessed in 19 patients. Doppler echocardiography was used to evaluate these parameters and cardiac output after pacing in the RV and in three different LV segments. Results. Pacing in the RV resulted in the greatest increases in asynchrony parameters from baseline: TE- R/L 59.8 ms (standard deviation [SD] 40.5 ms) vs. 28.23 ms (SD 56.9 ms), P=.002; TE-SD 53.2 ms (SD 34.4 ms) vs. 36.6 ms (SD 34.9 ms), P=.007; and TE-MD 135.3 ms (SD 82.9 ms) vs. 90.5 ms (SD 87.4 ms), P=.007. Pacing in the LV resulted in less asynchrony: for anterior LV pacing, TE-R/L was 17.2 ms (SD 53.8 ms), TE-SD was 35.8 ms (SD 17.9 ms), and TE-MD was 91.3 ms (SD 45.2). The change from baseline was not significant. Cardiac output was lower after RV pacing than after anterior LV pacing: 4.36 (SD 1) vs. 4.70 (SD 1); P=.001. Conclusions. Pacing in the LV produced less asynchrony than RV pacing. In addition, anterior LV pacing resulted in a higher cardiac output than RV pacing. These findings suggest that the location normally used for temporary leads after cardiac surgery should be changed (AU)

Selecting the best site for pacing leads after cardiac surgery by evaluating the asynchrony of myocardial deformation observed with different pacing sites.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: After cardiac surgery, temporary pacing leads are routinely implanted in the right ventricle (RV). The objective was to investigate the effect of different ventricular pacing locations on cardiac synchrony (by evaluating myocardial deformation, or strain) and efficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Interventricular asynchrony (i.e. the difference in the time of onset of deformation between right and left ventricles; Tε-R/L) and intraventricular asynchrony (i.e. the standard deviation and maximum difference in the time of onset of deformation in six segments of the left ventricle [LV]; Tε-SD and Tε-MD, respectively) were assessed in 19 patients. Doppler echocardiography was used to evaluate these parameters and cardiac output after pacing in the RV and in three different LV segments. RESULTS: Pacing in the RV resulted in the greatest increases in asynchrony parameters from baseline: Tε-R/L 59.8 ms (standard deviation [SD] 40.5 ms) vs. 28.23 ms (SD 56.9 ms), P=.002; Tε-SD 53.2 ms (SD 34.4 ms) vs. 36.6 ms (SD 34.9 ms), P=.007; and Tε-MD 135.3 ms (SD 82.9 ms) vs. 90.5 ms (SD 87.4 ms), P=.007. Pacing in the LV resulted in less asynchrony: for anterior LV pacing, Tε-R/L was 17.2 ms (SD 53.8 ms), Tε-SD was 35.8 ms (SD 17.9 ms), and Tε-MD was 91.3 ms (SD 45.2). The change from baseline was not significant. Cardiac output was lower after RV pacing than after anterior LV pacing: 4.36 (SD 1) vs. 4.70 (SD 1); P=.001. CONCLUSIONS: Pacing in the LV produced less asynchrony than RV pacing. In addition, anterior LV pacing resulted in a higher cardiac output than RV pacing. These findings suggest that the location normally used for temporary leads after cardiac surgery should be changed.

Evaluación de estenosis carotídea en pacientes subsidiarios de revascularización miocárdica / The evaluation of carotid stenosis in patients who can benefit from myocardial revascularisation

Introducción. La estenosis carotídea (EC) crítica es frecuente en pacientes pendientes de revascularización miocárdica (RM), aumenta el riesgo de ictus durante la cirugía y su diagnóstico es importante, aunque el tratamiento sea controvertido cuando coexisten ambas patologías. Objetivos. Estudiar la lesión carotídea en pacientes pendientes de RM y los factores asociados. Determinar la morbimortalidad de la cirugía combinada carotídea y la RM frente a cirugías separadas. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio prospectivo, observacional y consecutivo durante 16 meses; se realiza dúplex carotídeo en 140 candidatos a RM, y consideramos la EC crítica: lesión carotídea ≥ 70%, con un 72,9% varones y una edad media de 69,8 años. Realizamos análisis estadístico con SPSS 10.1, chi al cuadrado y test exacto de Fisher: p £ 0,05 es significativamente estadística. Resultados. Prevalencia de lesión carotídea: 16,5% EC ≥ 50%, 10% EC ≥ 70%, pero sólo 7,1% quirúrgicas, ya que cuatro casos fueron oclusión carotídea. 42,6% angor inestable, 5% fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo < 30%. Encontramos asociación significativa entre EC crítica en este tipo de pacientes con las siguientes variables: enfermedad cerebrovascular en el 37,5% de los casos (p = 0,009); lesión de tronco coronario izquierdo (TCI) ≥ 50% en el 22,2% (p = 0,002) y no padecer diabetes (p = 0,028). Practicamos cinco cirugías secuenciales: endarterectomía carotídea (EAC) seguida de RM cuatro cirugías combinadas y una RM emergente sin EAC. La morbimortalidad de la RM en pacientes con EC < 70% fue: 0,61% mortalidad, 0,69% morbilidad –seis infartos agudos de miocardio (IAM) y tres ictus–. En EC quirúrgicas hubo un exitus, un IAM. Conclusiones. Consideramos indicación primaria el estudio con dúplex carotídeo en estos pacientes; es especialmente importante cuando existe lesión del TCI significativa (≥ 50%) y enfermedad cerebrovascular. Proponemos cirugía combinada en pacientes cardiológicamente inestables y es recomendable en lesión del TCI ³ 50%, aunque sean necesarios ensayos clínicos que mejoren la indicación

Introduction. Critical carotid stenosis (CS) is frequent among patients who are waiting for myocardial revascularisation (MR), it increases the risk of stroke during the operation and it is important to diagnose it, although when the two pathologies coexist there is some controversy about treatment. Aims. To study carotid lesions in patients waiting for MR and the associated factors. We also intended to determine the morbidity and mortality rates of combined carotid and MR surgery versus separate procedures. Patients and methods. The study was prospective, observational and consecutive over a period of 16 months; carotid duplex was performed in 140 candidates for MR and the CS was considered to be critical: carotid lesion ≥ 70%, with 72.9% males and a mean age of 69.8 years. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 10.1, chi squared and Fisher’s exact test. p £ 0.05 is statistically significant. Results. Prevalence rate of carotid lesions: 16.5% CS ≥ 50%, 10% CS ≥ 70%, but only 7.1% surgical, since four were cases of carotid occlusion. 42.6% unstable angina, 5% severe left ventricle ejection fraction < 30%. We found a significant association between critical CS in this kind of patients and the following variables: cerebrovascular disease in 37.5% of cases (p = 0.009); left coronary artery trunk (LCT) lesion ≥ 50% in 22.2% (p = 0.002) and not suffering from diabetes (p = 0.028). Five sequential surgical procedures were performed: carotid endarterectomy (CE) followed by MR four combined interventions and one emerging MR without CE. MR morbidity and mortality rates in patients with CS < 70% were: 0.61% mortality, 0.69% morbidity –six acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) and three strokes– and with surgical CS there was one death and one AMI. Conclusions. We consider the use of carotid duplex as a primary indication in the study of these patients; it is especially important when there is significant injury to the LCT (≥ 50%) and cerebrovascular disease. We propose combined surgery in cardiologically unstable patients and it is recommendable in LCT lesion ³ 50%, although further clinical trials are needed to improve the indication